Repository navigation
Publish first-pass landscape catalogs and retained web research - #804
Draft
seathatflowsinourveins wants to merge 9 commits into
Draft
seathatflowsinourveins wants to merge 9 commits into
seathatflowsinourveins wants to merge 9 commits into
Conversation
seathatflowsinourveins
force-pushed
the
codex/landscape-sweeps-catalog-20261006
branch
from
October 6, 2026 20:55
1df17ee to
8b844d3
Compare
5 of 6 tasks
seathatflowsinourveins
force-pushed
the
codex/landscape-sweeps-catalog-20261006
branch
from
October 7, 2026 00:54
8b844d3 to
43f6a5d
Compare
seathatflowsinourveins
force-pushed
the
codex/landscape-sweeps-catalog-20261006
branch
from
October 7, 2026 01:01
43f6a5d to
08fb4e7
Compare
seathatflowsinourveins
force-pushed
the
codex/landscape-sweeps-catalog-20261006
branch
from
October 7, 2026 01:49
08fb4e7 to
40fe662
Compare
This was referenced Oct 7, 2026
Exact fingerprint scope authorized by CC review 043318Z after convergence-practice classified the fourth as public advisory metadata. Native Gitleaks 8.30.1 HEAD scan and 37 touched tests pass; no historical artifact or rule regex changed.
Collaborator
Author
|
Disposition: allowlisted metadata, documented in the scanner config. The two frozen SHA-256 bindings and the public advisory identifier are metadata, not secrets. Their exact reviewed fingerprints are documented using Gitleaks' native .gitleaksignore mechanism in this PR's scanner configuration. No secret values are reproduced here. The separate directory-mode variants and three current-content SHA bindings are prepared in the accepted V2 patch; its required full module and both native scan repeats remain pending during PRE-PARK. This disposition does not claim those checks have passed or that the V2 patch is already applied. The PR owner applies the final patch and repairs the registry order at its landing rebase. |
seathatflowsinourveins
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 12, 2026
Fix the decision record of the compounding rule text, docs/decisions/2026-10-11-compounding-rule-text.md. The six rule surfaces do not change. - Approval: the owner approved section 1's proposal, the first sentence, at 22:01Z. The second sentence was presented as an optional clause and the owner's answer did not single it out; the command center (CC) included it under the owner's delegation, because it restates the owner's own no-dates direction. The owner was told at 23:44Z, with the option to drop it. The record cites the ruling's addendum-01 and the SHA256 of each sentence. - #172: restated with its recorded supersession at 22:18:17Z, under which guard bypasses are follow-ups (research-queue row 23). #1014 landed as ccff876 with only the one-letter POINTER_VARIABLE suffix. - PR triage: 3 fold receivers (#878, #927, #958) merged without their 4 donors (#804, #915, #870, #829), citing the triage's addendum-01. - What the second sentence leaves in force (F1 of the trading lane's read of us-equities-trading #87): it forbids a date as the trigger that starts work, and every time bound the contract states as a fact or protocol window stays. - Checks: the budget test's sentence now says what the test does (the first GPT read of this PR): test_growth_in_any_loaded_file_crosses_the_fixed_budget fills the available headroom in each loaded file in turn, verifies that equality with the ceiling passes, then appends a two-byte UTF-8 character and verifies rejection. - manifests/evidence.json: the record re-registered with register_file. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
seathatflowsinourveins
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 12, 2026
…1020) * Rule text: work compounds through reviewed, cited repository records Add the compounding sentences of the command center's ruling, section 1 (sentence 1 owner-OK'd at 22:01Z; sentence 2 included under the owner's delegation, ruling addendum-01), to the "The ecosystem compounds" bullet on all six always-loaded rule surfaces: AGENTS.md, the portable Claude block, the Codex template, the scaffold and the two new-WSL carriers, regenerated with new_wsl_client_config.py --write-blocks. - tests: a fail-first test that every layer and native renderer carries the sentences once, in place (9 failing subtests before the change); CORE updated; the Codex top-rule pin re-derived (2,296 bytes); the startup byte ceilings raised by a dated comparison to 6,895/7,001. - docs/decisions/2026-10-11-compounding-rule-text.md: the dated trigger, evidence, surfaces, user-level pickup, budget comparison, checks and overturn conditions. - manifests/evidence.json: the changed files re-registered. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> * Record text: exact approval, #172 supersession, fold count, budget test Fix the decision record of the compounding rule text, docs/decisions/2026-10-11-compounding-rule-text.md. The six rule surfaces do not change. - Approval: the owner approved section 1's proposal, the first sentence, at 22:01Z. The second sentence was presented as an optional clause and the owner's answer did not single it out; the command center (CC) included it under the owner's delegation, because it restates the owner's own no-dates direction. The owner was told at 23:44Z, with the option to drop it. The record cites the ruling's addendum-01 and the SHA256 of each sentence. - #172: restated with its recorded supersession at 22:18:17Z, under which guard bypasses are follow-ups (research-queue row 23). #1014 landed as ccff876 with only the one-letter POINTER_VARIABLE suffix. - PR triage: 3 fold receivers (#878, #927, #958) merged without their 4 donors (#804, #915, #870, #829), citing the triage's addendum-01. - What the second sentence leaves in force (F1 of the trading lane's read of us-equities-trading #87): it forbids a date as the trigger that starts work, and every time bound the contract states as a fact or protocol window stays. - Checks: the budget test's sentence now says what the test does (the first GPT read of this PR): test_growth_in_any_loaded_file_crosses_the_fixed_budget fills the available headroom in each loaded file in turn, verifies that equality with the ceiling passes, then appends a two-byte UTF-8 character and verifies rejection. - manifests/evidence.json: the record re-registered with register_file. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Scope
This first pass publishes runtime, role and vendor-official landscape evidence through the repository's native sweep harness. The new vendor manifest preserves 133 proposals across 13 layers and 36 upheld assessments: 24 catalog candidates and 12 validated
not_adoptedrecords. Catalog inclusion installs, qualifies and authorizes nothing; the command center's later synthesis owns exclusive roles and defaults.0d5e6506434fab598dee861c749a22e628beb75a; lane:lane:foundation; draft until exact-head review and CC acknowledgment.manifest-20261006-runtimes,manifest-20261006-roles,manifest-20261006-vendor, each with its own RESULT and native ledger append.wf_fba23622-d34, full 13-layer runwf_62ccd24a-231; the separate audit follow-upwf_a1a1a5f1-a4fis CC-owned and still pending. The audit is an editorial/source-inspection lead, never certification or workload acceptance.adoption-wiring-note-20261007.jsonadds a linked forward note: adopted status requires cited vendor-native integration/readback and fresh organic-shaped smoke on both clients, followed by a working-day invocation report on the native channel. An unwired/uninvoked zero is an adoption defect. Existing conversion outcomes and ledger/RESULT notes were not rewritten.SOTA sources
creation-age-review.jsonwith cached API commands and exit codes. Warnings are dated to the frozen sweep, not permanent eligibility labels.host_receipts.register_file.Evidence-class table
returns.json; survivor/rejection labels remain historical observationsLocal commands run
Heavy steps ran serially with
nice -n 19 ionice -c3; no foundation calendar hold was applied.The initial validator failure caught an unregistered appended ledger hash; native re-registration repaired it. Both logs remain private. No failed run, condition or unknown usage was discarded. Native child usage, worker-declared tool calls, GPT usage and run-summary token metadata are separate counter scopes.
Decision record
docs/decisions/2026-10-06-landscape-sweep-catalog-publication.md, with a dated vendor addendum. The nine-finding carrier keeps the critic's first-round context and source corrections. Twelve missing slot inputs and canonical research/hash drift are routed to their owners; research-layer applicability is unresolved and recorded as a reopen. Current V1 already supports Hub URLs and the completed run retained two Hub models with their own refutations; its missing standing model-slot/currency coverage is a forward gap. The original critic and all observed results remain preserved.Host evidence
No host receipt, runtime installation or platform status was promoted. Adoption synthesis and organic counters remain separate.
Checklist
Content fold — 2026-10-07
This chain carries #751's fifteen original added files unchanged from 7c38e73. Its October5 ledger event is a new immutable historical carrier with a dated publication note; the current eight-row ledger and shared README are unchanged. The native read-only novelty check preserves7known/9new. No event is re-dated, re-chained or given new sweep credit.
Local fold checks:256 tests/1skip pass; validate.py and native ledger check pass;17files registered through host_receipts.register_file; generators and diff checks pass. The redacted scanner returned1 with3 metadata findings (two frozen SHA-256 bindings and one public advisory identifier). Disposition is pending with the CI owner; no passing scanner or CI acceptance is claimed, and this remains a draft outside the land queue.
The original proposed README section is retained below as historical text; it does not add a current local comparison gate. Current adoption follows the linked forward wiring note and owner synthesis.
+## Seeded web-research follow-up — 2026-10-05
The dated manifest publishes the
web-researchlane oflandscape-sweep-webresearch-20261005-ns2604, workflowwf_5d8a2a30-9b5: 16 formal proposals across the first and follow-up rounds,five surviving dispositions and eleven fit refutations. Four survivors remain
targeted_candidate(Exa MCP, Trafilatura, LettuceDetect and CDX Toolkit);IPI-proxy's surviving
not_adopteddisposition preserves its rejection.Stars supplied discovery seeds and establish no quality or adoption claim.
Each candidate still needs its recorded measured comparison and native organic-use
qualification. No selection, installation, platform acceptance or readiness changes.
Browser-use and Playwright MCP were retained as discovery-stage dropped proposals,
not included among the eleven formal refutations. The
decision and publication review
links all source reviews, retained votes, usage and the next-sweep gaps. The sections
below retain the September 22 audit; unrelated layers in the new snapshot were not
individually reviewed by this one-layer follow-up.
Follow-ups
Review disposition follows the CC PR-wave ruling: in-scope reproduced P1/P2 defects or false claims at the head are blockers; other findings stay in this list. P1 safety/privacy/money/order findings always block. Subsequent fixes wait for Claude, GPT and Codex on the same head, or an explicit CC release; open items after the second fix round go to CC adjudication. Candidate changes return to the research queue, and #1009 has queue priority.