Skip to content

Publish first-pass landscape catalogs and retained web research - #804

Draft
seathatflowsinourveins wants to merge 9 commits into
mainfrom
codex/landscape-sweeps-catalog-20261006
Draft

seathatflowsinourveins wants to merge 9 commits into
mainfrom
codex/landscape-sweeps-catalog-20261006

Conversation

@seathatflowsinourveins

@seathatflowsinourveins seathatflowsinourveins commented Oct 6, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Scope

This first pass publishes runtime, role and vendor-official landscape evidence through the repository's native sweep harness. The new vendor manifest preserves 133 proposals across 13 layers and 36 upheld assessments: 24 catalog candidates and 12 validated not_adopted records. Catalog inclusion installs, qualifies and authorizes nothing; the command center's later synthesis owns exclusive roles and defaults.

  • Base: 0d5e6506434fab598dee861c749a22e628beb75a; lane: lane:foundation; draft until exact-head review and CC acknowledgment.
  • Manifests: manifest-20261006-runtimes, manifest-20261006-roles, manifest-20261006-vendor, each with its own RESULT and native ledger append.
  • Source reviews: original 37 receipts retained plus 33 current default-branch snapshots for the vendor's 36 assessments. Current snapshots and historical adjudication pins remain distinct.
  • Vendor follow-up: smoke wf_fba23622-d34, full 13-layer run wf_62ccd24a-231; the separate audit follow-up wf_a1a1a5f1-a4f is CC-owned and still pending. The audit is an editorial/source-inspection lead, never certification or workload acceptance.
  • Toad's dated exclusion and Horde's young-repository warning remain unchanged. Official creation metadata adds sweep-date warnings for microsoft/nvx, openai/codex-security and UiPath/coder_eval; age alone changes no vote.
  • The original two manifests and first-pass reconciliation are byte-identical to the prior PR head; the earlier seven ledger records are an unchanged prefix. Final shared-file commit contains all three manifests, both reconciliation inputs, the ledger and registry.
  • adoption-wiring-note-20261007.json adds a linked forward note: adopted status requires cited vendor-native integration/readback and fresh organic-shaped smoke on both clients, followed by a working-day invocation report on the native channel. An unwired/uninvoked zero is an adoption defect. Existing conversion outcomes and ledger/RESULT notes were not rewritten.
  • Open ledger neighbours: Fix skills lifecycle gates and retain skills qualification evidence #719, Retain stopped 2026-10-04 skills landscape sweep #692, Publish seeded web-research follow-up with candidate qualification gates #751. Their rows are preserved at land-time by taking main's ledger and rerunning this branch's three native appends. READMEs remain with their existing writers.

SOTA sources

Evidence-class table

Claim Evidence class Command / carrier
Returned proposals and refuter outcomes source_review Original and vendor returns.json; survivor/rejection labels remain historical observations
Runtime's recorded children and copied GPT outputs native_proven, scoped to research execution Native usage collection complete for vendor101children; GPT statuses40ok/copies40match; not candidate runtime acceptance
Current upstream identity/README and creation metadata source_review 33 native source receipts plus creation-age-review; not the historical comparison pin
Structural bindings and local native-script regressions local_integration/synthetic Native ledger check, 545 tests/four skips, validate.py and redacted staged scans

Local commands run

Heavy steps ran serially with nice -n 19 ionice -c3; no foundation calendar hold was applied.

usage_record.py --transcript-dir <completed vendor transcripts> --out <private usage>
exit0: complete101children, no incomplete/superseded/effort mismatches/capped search
convert.py on original record
exit3: privacy guard; no output written; original raw retained
convert.py on linked sanitized derivative
exit0: 13layers/133proposals/36assessments,40GPTok/40copiesmatch,no failures/lost/reopens
source_reviews.py --survivors <native converted survivors> --out evidence/artifacts/landscape-sweep-20261006-vendor
exit0:33current commit-pinned source snapshots
build_manifest.py --freshness <retained roles snapshot> --reconciliations <new vendor input>
exit0; no repeated freshness pull
make_result.py --reopen <native JSON file>
exit0; initial unsupported inline-reopen argument exited2 and is retained in private command evidence
saturation_ledger.py --append evidence/artifacts/landscape-sweep-20261006-vendor/RESULT.json
exit0
saturation_ledger.py --check --base origin/main
exit0:8records, intact chain, bindings verified
python3 -m unittest tests.test_saturation_ledger tests.test_landscape_sweep_harness tests.test_sota_convergence -v
exit0:545tests,4skipped
python3 scripts/validate.py
exit0:69components,10429hashedfiles,4profiles,214receipts (after the linked wiring note)
gitleaks git --staged --redact=100 --no-banner --no-color
exit0:source artifacts and final hot files scanned separately
git diff --cached --check
exit0

The initial validator failure caught an unregistered appended ledger hash; native re-registration repaired it. Both logs remain private. No failed run, condition or unknown usage was discarded. Native child usage, worker-declared tool calls, GPT usage and run-summary token metadata are separate counter scopes.

Decision record

docs/decisions/2026-10-06-landscape-sweep-catalog-publication.md, with a dated vendor addendum. The nine-finding carrier keeps the critic's first-round context and source corrections. Twelve missing slot inputs and canonical research/hash drift are routed to their owners; research-layer applicability is unresolved and recorded as a reopen. Current V1 already supports Hub URLs and the completed run retained two Hub models with their own refutations; its missing standing model-slot/currency coverage is a forward gap. The original critic and all observed results remain preserved.

Host evidence

No host receipt, runtime installation or platform status was promoted. Adoption synthesis and organic counters remain separate.

Checklist

  • Three distinct native manifest/RESULT/ledger bindings; prior observations retained.
  • Tests, structural validation and redacted scans passed; shared files and registry last.
  • Source classes and current/historical pins distinguished; no install or local campaign authorized.
  • Audit follow-up conversion and later synthesis complete.
  • Fresh connector gate, exact-head GPT read and CC acknowledgment before a queue request.
  • Command center hands the acknowledged draft to the landing owner; this lane never merges.
  • Landing path: exact-head GPT read, then CC acknowledgment, then the rest of 5f's queue after Repair native install-plan acceptance after the hcom relaxation #723 and the published critical priority order. Rebase once on its explicit landing cue. No queue request is made while the separate audit/synthesis is pending.

Content fold — 2026-10-07

This chain carries #751's fifteen original added files unchanged from 7c38e73. Its October5 ledger event is a new immutable historical carrier with a dated publication note; the current eight-row ledger and shared README are unchanged. The native read-only novelty check preserves7known/9new. No event is re-dated, re-chained or given new sweep credit.

Local fold checks:256 tests/1skip pass; validate.py and native ledger check pass;17files registered through host_receipts.register_file; generators and diff checks pass. The redacted scanner returned1 with3 metadata findings (two frozen SHA-256 bindings and one public advisory identifier). Disposition is pending with the CI owner; no passing scanner or CI acceptance is claimed, and this remains a draft outside the land queue.

The original proposed README section is retained below as historical text; it does not add a current local comparison gate. Current adoption follows the linked forward wiring note and owner synthesis.

+## Seeded web-research follow-up — 2026-10-05

The dated manifest publishes the
web-research lane of landscape-sweep-webresearch-20261005-ns2604, workflow
wf_5d8a2a30-9b5: 16 formal proposals across the first and follow-up rounds,
five surviving dispositions and eleven fit refutations. Four survivors remain
targeted_candidate (Exa MCP, Trafilatura, LettuceDetect and CDX Toolkit);
IPI-proxy's surviving not_adopted disposition preserves its rejection.
Stars supplied discovery seeds and establish no quality or adoption claim.

Each candidate still needs its recorded measured comparison and native organic-use
qualification. No selection, installation, platform acceptance or readiness changes.
Browser-use and Playwright MCP were retained as discovery-stage dropped proposals,
not included among the eleven formal refutations. The
decision and publication review
links all source reviews, retained votes, usage and the next-sweep gaps. The sections
below retain the September 22 audit; unrelated layers in the new snapshot were not
individually reviewed by this one-layer follow-up.

Follow-ups

  • Retain the CC-owned audit/synthesis and owner-routed missing-slot, currency and research-applicability work in the research queue; reconcile the dated publication status from owner evidence at landing.

Review disposition follows the CC PR-wave ruling: in-scope reproduced P1/P2 defects or false claims at the head are blockers; other findings stay in this list. P1 safety/privacy/money/order findings always block. Subsequent fixes wait for Claude, GPT and Codex on the same head, or an explicit CC release; open items after the second fix round go to CC adjudication. Candidate changes return to the research queue, and #1009 has queue priority.

@seathatflowsinourveins seathatflowsinourveins added the lane:foundation Foundation lane: Claude/Codex setup, hosts, memory, RAG, research, workers label Oct 6, 2026
@seathatflowsinourveins seathatflowsinourveins changed the title catalog: first pass for October 6 runtime and role sweeps Catalog: first pass from runtime, role and vendor landscape sweeps Oct 7, 2026
@seathatflowsinourveins
seathatflowsinourveins force-pushed the codex/landscape-sweeps-catalog-20261006 branch from 8b844d3 to 43f6a5d Compare October 7, 2026 00:54
@seathatflowsinourveins
seathatflowsinourveins force-pushed the codex/landscape-sweeps-catalog-20261006 branch from 43f6a5d to 08fb4e7 Compare October 7, 2026 01:01
@seathatflowsinourveins
seathatflowsinourveins force-pushed the codex/landscape-sweeps-catalog-20261006 branch from 08fb4e7 to 40fe662 Compare October 7, 2026 01:49
@seathatflowsinourveins seathatflowsinourveins changed the title Catalog: first pass from runtime, role and vendor landscape sweeps Publish first-pass landscape catalogs and retained web research Oct 7, 2026
Exact fingerprint scope authorized by CC review 043318Z after convergence-practice classified the fourth as public advisory metadata. Native Gitleaks 8.30.1 HEAD scan and 37 touched tests pass; no historical artifact or rule regex changed.
@seathatflowsinourveins

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Disposition: allowlisted metadata, documented in the scanner config.

The two frozen SHA-256 bindings and the public advisory identifier are metadata, not secrets. Their exact reviewed fingerprints are documented using Gitleaks' native .gitleaksignore mechanism in this PR's scanner configuration. No secret values are reproduced here.

The separate directory-mode variants and three current-content SHA bindings are prepared in the accepted V2 patch; its required full module and both native scan repeats remain pending during PRE-PARK. This disposition does not claim those checks have passed or that the V2 patch is already applied. The PR owner applies the final patch and repairs the registry order at its landing rebase.

seathatflowsinourveins added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2026
Fix the decision record of the compounding rule text,
docs/decisions/2026-10-11-compounding-rule-text.md. The six rule
surfaces do not change.

- Approval: the owner approved section 1's proposal, the first
  sentence, at 22:01Z. The second sentence was presented as an optional
  clause and the owner's answer did not single it out; the command
  center (CC) included it under the owner's delegation, because it
  restates the owner's own no-dates direction. The owner was told at
  23:44Z, with the option to drop it. The record cites the ruling's
  addendum-01 and the SHA256 of each sentence.
- #172: restated with its recorded supersession at 22:18:17Z, under
  which guard bypasses are follow-ups (research-queue row 23). #1014
  landed as ccff876 with only the one-letter POINTER_VARIABLE suffix.
- PR triage: 3 fold receivers (#878, #927, #958) merged without their
  4 donors (#804, #915, #870, #829), citing the triage's addendum-01.
- What the second sentence leaves in force (F1 of the trading lane's
  read of us-equities-trading #87): it forbids a date as the trigger
  that starts work, and every time bound the contract states as a fact
  or protocol window stays.
- Checks: the budget test's sentence now says what the test does (the
  first GPT read of this PR):
  test_growth_in_any_loaded_file_crosses_the_fixed_budget fills the
  available headroom in each loaded file in turn, verifies that
  equality with the ceiling passes, then appends a two-byte UTF-8
  character and verifies rejection.
- manifests/evidence.json: the record re-registered with register_file.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
seathatflowsinourveins added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2026
…1020)

* Rule text: work compounds through reviewed, cited repository records

Add the compounding sentences of the command center's ruling, section 1
(sentence 1 owner-OK'd at 22:01Z; sentence 2 included under the owner's
delegation, ruling addendum-01), to the "The ecosystem compounds" bullet
on all six always-loaded rule surfaces: AGENTS.md, the portable Claude
block, the Codex template, the scaffold and the two new-WSL carriers,
regenerated with new_wsl_client_config.py --write-blocks.

- tests: a fail-first test that every layer and native renderer carries
  the sentences once, in place (9 failing subtests before the change);
  CORE updated; the Codex top-rule pin re-derived (2,296 bytes); the
  startup byte ceilings raised by a dated comparison to 6,895/7,001.
- docs/decisions/2026-10-11-compounding-rule-text.md: the dated trigger,
  evidence, surfaces, user-level pickup, budget comparison, checks and
  overturn conditions.
- manifests/evidence.json: the changed files re-registered.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>

* Record text: exact approval, #172 supersession, fold count, budget test

Fix the decision record of the compounding rule text,
docs/decisions/2026-10-11-compounding-rule-text.md. The six rule
surfaces do not change.

- Approval: the owner approved section 1's proposal, the first
  sentence, at 22:01Z. The second sentence was presented as an optional
  clause and the owner's answer did not single it out; the command
  center (CC) included it under the owner's delegation, because it
  restates the owner's own no-dates direction. The owner was told at
  23:44Z, with the option to drop it. The record cites the ruling's
  addendum-01 and the SHA256 of each sentence.
- #172: restated with its recorded supersession at 22:18:17Z, under
  which guard bypasses are follow-ups (research-queue row 23). #1014
  landed as ccff876 with only the one-letter POINTER_VARIABLE suffix.
- PR triage: 3 fold receivers (#878, #927, #958) merged without their
  4 donors (#804, #915, #870, #829), citing the triage's addendum-01.
- What the second sentence leaves in force (F1 of the trading lane's
  read of us-equities-trading #87): it forbids a date as the trigger
  that starts work, and every time bound the contract states as a fact
  or protocol window stays.
- Checks: the budget test's sentence now says what the test does (the
  first GPT read of this PR):
  test_growth_in_any_loaded_file_crosses_the_fixed_budget fills the
  available headroom in each loaded file in turn, verifies that
  equality with the ceiling passes, then appends a two-byte UTF-8
  character and verifies rejection.
- manifests/evidence.json: the record re-registered with register_file.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

lane:foundation Foundation lane: Claude/Codex setup, hosts, memory, RAG, research, workers

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant