Repository navigation
evidence: use mainline pins for application input amendments - #782
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 681b6240e8
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
…fore the final hot-file commit Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
… (hot-file protocol: every hot-file edit in the last commit) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
69dcb00 to
f6dbd51
Compare
|
Claude session native-agent-stack-5f: landing at head Observed main Required checks at this head: 7 pass . Unresolved review threads: 0. |
|
Claude session native-agent-stack-5f: post-merge observation. Landed as |
Scope
After #765's squash merge, use mainline revisions for its preserved-record and validator source references. Attribute the binding-amendment decision to the command center that ruled on it.
c1300c15b42f1a6643f3dc4172f40c01d99abdcd(fix: relock production dependencies and preserve captured evidence #765's landed squash).lane:foundation.history/recipe-revisions.json,docs/decisions/2026-10-06-application-input-binding-amendment.md,evidence/receipts/pr765-bindings-amendment-20261006.json, and the evidence registry last.base_revisionand the decision's historical review-head reference remain. Original snapshots, canonical experiments, archived locks, measured outputs and production pins retain their bytes.SOTA sources
9372ee1635b6c818ca31fc3d73d33802d85293218bcea7467c4fc5aebbd43ec9, 11,094 bytes.eb2ceb9c57ed3f11125a5091a85bf19dcb10e364dfb2b67d8c1b444970b300f3, 25,990 bytes.native-agent-stack@ecfa112764c664d35377dd66b8cfcb67e5a94d60:blueprints/convergence-practice/application-delivery/test_portability.py:101-131,scripts/validate_convergence.py:60-71,203-243, andblueprints/convergence-practice/contract.schema.json:6. Their entire files equal the previous source pin. The decision's cited guard-test ranges also match at ecfa112.67c6594d2from the two retained mainline revisions.task-ns2604-coop-20261006T100349Z, relayed as PR765-FOLLOWUP, assigns these exact pin corrections and command-center-only attribution.native-agent-stack@c1300c15b42f1a6643f3dc4172f40c01d99abdcd:docs/lanes.md:96-128supplies the registry-last protocol.Evidence-class table
git merge-base --is-ancestor: both replacement pins exit 0; old branch pin control exits 1scripts/validate.py, 10,315 hashed filesLocal commands run
No full suite was rerun for these source-reference edits. #765's failed local full-suite result remains in its receipt, separate from its accepted hosted run. The four retained blob comparisons and receipt non-source-field comparison passed without altering data. The source completeness critic accepted the six-line diff and three-file registry scope.
Decision record
docs/decisions/2026-10-06-application-input-binding-amendment.mdretains its alternatives and hash/path overturn conditions; only source attribution and the responsible decision-maker change.Host evidence
No host-receipt, platform-status, installer or host configuration changes. Request the co-op's exact-head GPT micro-check and command-center ACK; keep this PR a draft. #765's accepted branch is untouched.
Checklist
FIX-782 same-day correction (2026-10-06)
Same-day correction at the command center’s direction (FIX-782, CC item 220640Z; final no-rewrite scope 230116Z): the portability-test reference is now c1300c1:blueprints/convergence-practice/application-delivery/test_portability.py:100-143, superseding this description’s earlier ecfa112 reference/whole-file-equality statement and extending the initial six-line follow-up with the returned six-test run (exit 0), with no recorded observation altered.