Repository navigation
Publish seeded web-research follow-up with candidate qualification gates - #751
Closed
seathatflowsinourveins wants to merge 2 commits into
Closed
seathatflowsinourveins wants to merge 2 commits into
seathatflowsinourveins wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
3 of 6 tasks
Collaborator
Author
|
Folded into #804 by the PR triage of 2026-10-07 (PR-CAP8, the command center's ruling). Closed with a record, not merged. Verified by the co-op at #804 head 40fe662: all 15 files this PR added are byte-identical there; the 2026-10-05 ledger event is carried as a new immutable historical record ( |
seathatflowsinourveins
deleted the
codex/ns2604-webresearch-sweep-20261005
branch
October 8, 2026 17:05
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Scope
Publish the user's seeded
web-researchsweeplandscape-sweep-webresearch-20261005-ns2604(workflowwf_5d8a2a30-9b5) through the existing landscape harness steps 9–12. Sixteen formal proposals yielded four targeted candidates, IPI-proxy's preservednot_adopteddisposition, and eleven fit refutations. The PR retains the dated manifest, source reviews, original converted evidence/usage/seeds/scope and an append-only saturation record; current selections, host acceptance and installation plans are unchanged.2d849ba1fe1b879144cfa470f0514d3ac3b8e487; original frozen publication inputs/tests started ate7d94e7bcc074edba093994c8853e59b650ce7e0.lane:foundation; this PR stays draft for the command center's Claude read.catalogs/sota-convergence/manifest-20261005-webresearch-ns2604.json, the dated decision and index paragraph; native append/generator projections andmanifests/evidence.jsonin the last commit.SOTA sources
Evidence-class table
returns.json/lanes.json, five native upstream-provenance reviews; no survivor executedok, four recorded copy matches; complete native Claude child usageconvert-summary.json,returns.json,landscape-sweep-webresearch-20261005-ns2604-attempts/child-usage-wf_5d8a2a30-9b5.json; not a new model run, host acceptance or savings measurementtests.test_saturation_ledgerandtests.test_landscape_sweep_harness; owned-cache TMPDIR, no network/model callsLocal commands run
Exact private argv, failures and final integrated results are recorded in the lane status. The failed post-rebase check is retained: the final appended ledger needed re-registration before validation. No test or validator was weakened. Read-only locator/syntax mistakes were corrected before publication; original returned evidence was never rewritten.
Decision record
docs/decisions/2026-10-05-seeded-web-research-landscape.mdnames alternatives, source pins, original votes and each measurement that would overturn the disposition. Adoption still requires that measured comparison and native organic-use qualification; this PR authorizes neither a provider flip nor a runtime install.Scope corrections are explicit: Browser-use/Playwright MCP are discovery-stage dropped entries, not formal refutations. The original critic covered the first eight before the eight-proposal follow-up. IPI-proxy remains rejected under this wave's maintenance rule. The benchmark judge's URL-or-token rule does not establish strict citation support; a repository pin does not freeze the hosted MCP service. CDX equality must account for published redactions/HTML-to-text transforms. The configured promptfoo assertion question remains attributed reviewer evidence rather than a current-client absence claim.
Host evidence
No
evidence/hosts/change or platform-status promotion. The co-op owns cross-family draft review, any later qualification/activation and landing; this lane does not merge.Checklist