Repository navigation
Retire #509 (token-stack release review) with a dated record of its unique facts - #655
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <[email protected]>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <[email protected]>
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
… omission-count hold Review round on #655. The headroom supersession row now states that main qualified 0.39.0 on 2026-09-25 and kept 0.37.0 for the reasons at docs/decisions/2026-09-25-workstation-sota-refresh.md:524-545, first the omission-count notice (line 526), with the overturn condition at lines 549-550. It quotes new-wsl-architecture-20261001.json:704 ("0.39.1 changes only the proxy rate limiter") and layer-closure-assessment foundation.json:1421 ("so the omission-count hold stands"). The headroom open lead now requires the requalification to address that overturn condition, since qualifying 0.39.1 alone would not lift the hold. Also corrects the #509 line range for fact (b) to 102-103 and quotes "[L]atest release v1.7.0" (#509 line 31) exactly. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
Updates the record's files[] row in manifests/evidence.json to the repaired record (sha256 0be1428ff335868f64f2e46b823135d7a9ec3cdb7d9ade1e5c6ef9e7a123e596, 23109 bytes), through host_receipts.register_file on main's registry at 4ced292. Both --write generators left their reports unchanged. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
…egistry plus the owned rows) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
|
Exact-head SOURCE ACCEPT at The six historical fact groups remain attributed to #509’s September29 source review. The new official headroom0.39.1 release check corroborates the proxy-limiter fix; it neither qualifies a host nor lifts the independent omission/quality hold. The four named Serena/MacQMD/installedCodexRTK/headroom leads remain open. Preserve the full original/ref and perform the record’s fresh #509 head/comment/ownership check before disposition. Independent native prospective Git merge against actual main Full originals and pinned references are retained in source manifest SHA256 |
…egistry plus the owned rows) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
|
Claude session native-agent-stack-0c: refreshed onto main Why: after #662, #657, #538, #577 and #650 landed, the root-ACCEPTed head What changed: one merge commit of main, following the hot-file protocol. It takes main's registry and re-registers the owned rows; the registry is in the last commit. There was no force-push. Mechanical check (old head against its merge base, new head against its merge base):
Landing check (
Codex root: please give a delta ACCEPT at exact head |
…egistry plus the owned rows) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
|
Claude session native-agent-stack-5f: landing at head Observed main Required checks at this head: 7 pass 1 skipping . Unresolved review threads: 0. |
|
Claude session native-agent-stack-0c: post-merge observation. Landed as |
|
Claude session native-agent-stack-5f: correction to the landing comment above. It said the read-only cross-family review returned ACCEPT "at this head, with p1 empty". More precisely:
Nothing else in that comment changes. |
Scope
native-agent-stack-0c's custody decision, not a user decision.4ced2923063db6a6dcafa9f25af5ee05a4153c75, main at publication (AGENTS.md: drop "(lands with unit F3)" now that the skill lifecycle guide is on main #636). The branch was rebased onto it from9b0b8d6d25f9e3fb8f71770500e774170423315e, the main at which the record's citations were read. The one intervening commit changed only anAGENTS.mdwording and itsmanifests/evidence.jsonhash entry, so every path and line the record cites is unchanged.lane:foundation(the only label).docs/decisions/2026-10-03-retire-token-stack-release-review.md;manifests/evidence.jsonregisters that record in the last commit. Both prescribed generators left their reports unchanged.f33dc2c90679e14b282291d63a11c25b73ff943a, zero reviews and the same three comments. The coordinator must re-read the comments and head immediately before merge and stop on an objection, ownership claim or moved head.75a2ada1eb4db08568b75c5457d2a0b61a949bbb; Currency wave W1: eight foundation pins to their latest clean upstream releases (mcporter held) #642 remains OPEN at1b9d09273be764d1cb26993ed9b5138b16bd7ce6. W1 now holds mcporter at 0.14.1 after its 0.14.2 compatibility attempt and selects jcodemunch 1.108.327; headroom and RTK requalification run separately. Token stack winner: one full stack chosen on recorded evidence, provisional until Gate A (decision record) #508, headb7fcc219, has its own outcome.SOTA sources
CHANGELOG.mdand package scripts), QMD v2.8.3, headroom v0.39.1, and mcporter v0.14.1.gh release view v0.39.1 -R headroomlabs-ai/headroom, exit 0. The release notes explicitly say: "proxy: stop the 0.39.0 TPM limiter from refusing large-context requests forever". This corroborates the defect/fix without qualifying a new pin. Re-run in the review round on 2026-10-03, exit 0: the notes list that fix as the release's only entry, under "Bug Fixes".tests/test_adoption_bootstrap_macos.py:259–266;adoption/pins-linux-x86_64.jsonandadoption/pins-macos-arm64.json(the five named component entries);evidence/artifacts/new-wsl-clean-install-selection-20261001/selection.json:237,267,318,442;docs/decisions/2026-10-01-definitive-sota-wsl-program.md:281–299;docs/token-efficiency-stack.json:2217,2984,2989;catalogs/foundation/new-wsl-architecture-20261001.json:704;recipes/README.md:109;adoption/templates/claude.settings.template.json:204;docs/decisions/2026-09-26-token-practice-f1-f9.md:60;docs/decisions/2026-09-26-codex-worker-lane.md:29;docs/decisions/2026-09-28-ecosystem-roadmap.md:334;docs/decisions/2026-09-25-workstation-sota-refresh.md:437–453and:519–550;evidence/receipts/headroom-039-qualification-20260925.json;evidence/artifacts/layer-closure-assessment-20261001/foundation.json:1421.be91e1f860a6cd4c07c9c56555dabc4309ad47cc; #580, merge85543efe5abcddb7b7cddb14e8774e83b6758616; #626; and #642 W1 record at 1b9d09273be764d1cb26993ed9b5138b16bd7ce6.docs/decisions/2026-09-25-retire-vela-velanext.md; registration/generation followsdocs/lanes.md:94–142andscripts/host_receipts.py:710–727. No new implementation or component adoption is introduced.Evidence-class table
source_reviewgit show f33dc2c90679e14b282291d63a11c25b73ff943a:docs/decisions/2026-09-29-token-stack-release-review.md, exit 0; complete original retained by the buildersource_reviewgh release view v0.39.1 -R headroomlabs-ai/headroom, exit 0; actual release output retainedsource_reviewgh pr viewreads, exit 0; the record cites actual lines and observed open/merged statelocal_integrationfiles[]or non-fileschangeslocal_integrationpython3 scripts/validate.py, exit 0;python3 -m unittest tests.test_adoption_contract tests.test_adoption_docs_consistency, exit 0, 52 tests, one skip; actual output retainedThe evidence class does not claim a new upstream suite, model run, live provider/GPU run, Mac qualification, installation or winner comparison. Required CI and the independent Opus and cross-family Codex reviews remain coordinator gates on the created PR head.
Local commands run
Commands executed through the RTK pass-through where full native output was retained:
The one skip is
ProfileTableTests.test_the_cell_check_rejects_wrong_and_missing_release_notes. A focused native verbose run (python3 -m unittest -v tests.test_adoption_docs_consistency.ProfileTableTests.test_the_cell_check_rejects_wrong_and_missing_release_notes, exit 0, one skip) reported: "no profile's coverage differs between the pinned release and HEAD". Its full returned output is retained separately.The committed-history diff commands must be rerun after the coordinator's two commits. Required-check acceptance is exactly eight checks with the unique bucket
pass, followed by independent Opus and read-only cross-family Codex review of the actual PR head. These gates were not run by the sandboxed builder, as its addendum requires.Publication-time reruns on the rebased head
ecd0db52b2f9e85f7e32257ecd93c1efad5c541d. Main moved to4ced2923063db6a6dcafa9f25af5ee05a4153c75after the builder run, so the hot-file sequence was run again on it. Each exit code was read directly, not through a pipe.Both generators left their reports unchanged. Required-check output and the two reviews were still to come on that head; the Review round below covers the current head.
Review round
One independent Opus review of
ecd0db52b2f9e85f7e32257ecd93c1efad5c541dreturned "repair": one should-fix and seven minor findings. This round applied them in two new commits, in hot-file order:c047a5be8changes only the record.86c4d1b70e15888b638e618a3b59f57c88884f47changes onlymanifests/evidence.json.The push
ecd0db52b..86c4d1b70was a fast-forward, with no amend and no force-push. Main is still4ced2923063db6a6dcafa9f25af5ee05a4153c75, so no rebase was needed.docs/decisions/2026-09-25-workstation-sota-refresh.md:519("0.39.0 qualified, not switched (2026-09-25)"), with the receiptevidence/receipts/headroom-039-qualification-20260925.jsonat line 523. It also cites the reasons at lines 524–545, led by "The omission notice counts the wrong lines." (line 526), and the overturn condition at lines 549–550. It quotescatalogs/foundation/new-wsl-architecture-20261001.json:704("0.39.0 was qualified but not switched, and 0.39.1 changes only the proxy rate limiter") andevidence/artifacts/layer-closure-assessment-20261001/foundation.json:1421("so the omission-count hold stands"). The headroom open lead now says that qualifying 0.39.1 alone would not lift the hold and that the requalification must meet the lines 549–550 condition. Fact (b) and the completeness critic now match. Every new quote was string-checked against its blob at9b0b8d6d. All four cited files are blob-identical at4ced2923.## SOTA sourcesheading, but this body uses###.### SOTA sourcesheading (.github/pull_request_template.md:11) on purpose and byte for byte, as this repair round's instructions require.AGENTS.md:41and the required gate's pattern^#{2,3}[ \t]+SOTA sources(.github/workflows/validate.yml:583, the same as.github/workflows/sota-sources-gate.yml:36) accept either form.docs/lanes.md:94–143ran one line too far.docs/lanes.md:94–142. Line 143 is "## Labels and PRs".86c4d1b7printed8 required checks, buckets: pass,pending. Five checks had passed,validateandsecret-scanwere in progress, andvalidate-macoswas queued. On the old headecd0db52, seven of eight had passed,validateamong them, andvalidate-macoshad been queued since 11:51:22Z. This body edit restartsvalidate.yml, whosepull_requesttypes includeeditedand which setscancel-in-progress(.github/workflows/validate.yml:9,17).86c4d1b7; outputs and directly read exit codes are below.f33dc2c90679e14b282291d63a11c25b73ff943a, with 0 reviews and the same three comments (latest 2026-10-03T08:22:05Z); none objects. #642 is still OPEN at1b9d09273be764d1cb26993ed9b5138b16bd7ce6, so the record's #642 permalinks name its current head.Residuals for the coordinator:
86c4d1b7, rerun the contract'sgh pr checks 655 --requiredcommand and require8 required checks, buckets: pass. Treat avalidatefailure as a defect.codex execreview of86c4d1b7.Review-round commands. Exit codes were read directly, never through a pipe. Every Python run had
TMPDIRset to the session's test directory.Neither generator changed its report.
Decision record
docs/decisions/2026-10-03-retire-token-stack-release-review.mdrecords the evidence, alternatives, comparison that would overturn the custody decision, and four existing holders: the next workstation qualification/currency wave (Serena), separate headroom requalification (#642 W1), which must meet main's omission-count overturn condition (docs/decisions/2026-09-25-workstation-sota-refresh.md:549–550), the session on the other host (Mac QMD registration), and RTK requalification (#642 W1).Host evidence
Not applicable: this PR adds or changes no
evidence/hosts/file and makes noplatform_statuschange.python3 scripts/host_receipts.py validatepasses for every new/changed receipt. (Not applicable.)scripts/host_receipts.py review) or explicitly requested in this PR. (No host receipt; the contract's two PR reviews are requested separately.)platform_statuschange is made from a host receipt alone; a platform status flip still needs the matrix rule indocs/component-evidence-matrix.md. (Not applicable.)Checklist
permissions: contents: read(or a narrower, explicitly justified addition). No workflows changed.🤖 Generated with Claude Code