Repository navigation
Establish adaptive-paper-broker-trial on a main-built 1x paper trial (paper rung ready) - #128
Merged
seathatflowsinourveins merged 4 commits intoSep 23, 2026
Conversation
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
seathatflowsinourveins
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2026
…y; fix the README hash wording Independent review of #128: the numbers and the full-duration run check out (147 decisions over 299.04 s, largest gap 2.11 s), but the note still stated the earlier 1e2c96a-on-main precondition and a pending receipt as current. The note now records the precondition as replaced by those direct checks, with the comparison that would overturn it, and labels the older text as history. The README names git archive 843dc8f as the hashed tree. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 5518e0f062
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
seathatflowsinourveins
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2026
…y; fix the README hash wording Independent review of #128: the numbers and the full-duration run check out (147 decisions over 299.04 s, largest gap 2.11 s), but the note still stated the earlier 1e2c96a-on-main precondition and a pending receipt as current. The note now records the precondition as replaced by those direct checks, with the comparison that would overturn it, and labels the older text as history. The README names git archive 843dc8f as the hashed tree. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
seathatflowsinourveins
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2026
…checkpoint GitHub review threads on #128: catalogs/us-equities/runtime-target.json broker_status and observability/grand-dashboard/state.json (paper lane and alpaca-paper-operational gate rows, recorded_at) still described the trial as not started. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
seathatflowsinourveins
force-pushed
the
claude/adaptive-paper-broker-trial-flip-20260923
branch
from
September 23, 2026 17:27
4d3eea3 to
8f34b4a
Compare
…(paper rung ready) Trial adaptive-20260923g ran from a read-only git archive of main 843dc8f (with the three #123 engine fixes): 300.5 s at 1x on SIP, 5 real paper orders with one cancel-replace and 4 native fills over two 1-share round trips (INTC, GOOGL), 134 crossed quotes dropped, reconciled flat with cash and positions matching, realized -0.28 USD; the read-only broker order readback matches. The receipt's broker_readiness is now passed (previous block kept under broker_readiness.previous); the gate moves to established, native_proven; trading_gates.py reports rung_ready.paper true. Evidence of engine and broker order flow at 1x with 1-share orders, not of strategy edge. The leverage-ladder rungs keep their own receipts. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
…y; fix the README hash wording Independent review of #128: the numbers and the full-duration run check out (147 decisions over 299.04 s, largest gap 2.11 s), but the note still stated the earlier 1e2c96a-on-main precondition and a pending receipt as current. The note now records the precondition as replaced by those direct checks, with the comparison that would overturn it, and labels the older text as history. The README names git archive 843dc8f as the hashed tree. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
…checkpoint GitHub review threads on #128: catalogs/us-equities/runtime-target.json broker_status and observability/grand-dashboard/state.json (paper lane and alpaca-paper-operational gate rows, recorded_at) still described the trial as not started. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
progress.py accepts only [A-Za-z0-9_. /+()-] up to 160 characters; the previous values used ':' and ','. CI caught it (tests.test_grand_dashboard). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
seathatflowsinourveins
force-pushed
the
claude/adaptive-paper-broker-trial-flip-20260923
branch
from
September 23, 2026 17:54
8f34b4a to
b000af3
Compare
seathatflowsinourveins
deleted the
claude/adaptive-paper-broker-trial-flip-20260923
branch
September 23, 2026 18:03
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
adaptive-20260923gran from a read-onlygit archiveof main843dc8f, which includes the three Fix three engine defects exposed by live SIP paper trials; first passed 1x trial recorded #123 engine fixes. All 443 frozen files match the tree.adaptive-paper/receipt.jsonnow hasbroker_readiness.status=passed; the old block is kept asbroker_readiness.previous.established/native_proven, andtrading_gates.py --checknow reportsrung_ready.paper: true.Evidence class
native_paperat 1x with 1-share orders over one 5-minute window. That is evidence of real order flow, cancel-replace, reconciliation and cleanup, not of strategy edge. The leverage-ladder rungs (1x, 2x, 4x) keep their own receipts.Checks
python3 -m unittest: 3075 OK (342 skipped).validate.ymlsteps pass, and guarded gitleaks overorigin/main..HEADis clean.🤖 Generated with Claude Code