Repository navigation
Scrub owner quotations from the new-WSL records: paraphrase the canonical inputs, regenerate, and carry a dated paraphrase in the relay contract - #1161
Open
seathatflowsinourveins wants to merge 10 commits into
Conversation
seathatflowsinourveins
changed the base branch from
claude/cc-native-practice-owner-quote-scrub-20261015
to
main
October 15, 2026 13:01
seathatflowsinourveins
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 15, 2026
…ecome dated paraphrases; a tree-wide scanner with a ratchet baseline The command center's FULL read of #1161 at c95453a (CHANGES_REQUESTED) and its split ruling of 2026-10-15T13:25Z. P1, the named records (each paraphrased with its date and they/them, with a supersession note beside the change): - wave2-records.json owner_decisions[1]: verbatim -> paraphrase, plus publication_note; - claude-request.md: the opening quotation and the quotation in item 3; - docs/decisions/2026-10-04-repository-quality-rule.md: the block quote; - new-wsl-fix-wave-20261004/repository-quality-promptfoo.json and final-architecture-round2-20261004/verdicts.json: owner_words -> owner_paraphrase plus publication_note; verdicts.json's correction (Q11), its 1067 reason and its 2541 claim lose their quotations; - docs/decisions/2026-10-04-upstream-surface-watch.md: the requirement's quotation; - the consensus record's claim that the rule record quotes the rule verbatim, regenerated into the manifest and the handbook. Re-bound: the consensus record's hashed records, copy-notes.json (sha256 and a replacement entry) and integration-resolutions.json's measured_record; the manifest and the handbook through their builders; the handbook receipt gains a regeneration entry, and every previous_outputs entry now has its reason (P3, receipt.json:1308). Dated historical captures (starred-protected-20261011, starred-convergence-20261010, the 2026-10-08 g6c-b record, the 2026-10-06 fix-wave receipts, the 2026-10-07 gateway relabel) keep the hashes of their own dates. P2: DIGEST_LIKE also refuses a named algorithm in any case (sha256, or sha512- as in SRI integrity) and a base64 run (20+ characters with a digit and both letter cases), so a session name such as native-agent-stack-99 still passes. P3: the relay paraphrases are in they/them; an interim owner decision and a relayed owner_decisions entry refuse an owner-words key at runtime; a paraphrase that is only its prefix is refused. Tree-wide scanner (tests/test_owner_quote_publication.py): every tracked text file, owner-attribution markers (the owner, or the user as these records call the owner, near a speech word and a quote mark; a verbatim claim; an owner-words key; a verbatim key in a file of owner decisions; a block quote introduced as owner speech), JSON string values read one by one so their delimiters are not quotation, and dated-paraphrase block quotes skipped. tests/fixtures/owner-quote-baseline.json holds per-file counts (names and counts only) for the burn-down PRs: an unlisted file must be clean and a count changes only with the baseline. Fail-before: the scanner at c95453a with this baseline lists the named records as unlisted files with hits, and the assembler's new negative controls fail there. After: tests.test_owner_quote_publication, test_new_wsl_definitive_defaults, test_new_wsl_handbook, test_research_entry and the other readers of these files OK; assemble_manifest --check, render_tables --check and build_new_wsl_handbook --check exit 0; validate rc 0. No history rewrite. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
seathatflowsinourveins
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 15, 2026
…oted owner words, a wider detector, dated record names The command center's adjudication of #1161 at 9371e2a (third round, scope-locked). Findings cited by path:line. - P1: evidence/artifacts/new-wsl-layer-consensus-20261002/claude-proposals.md:88 held an attributed owner sentence with no speech word. It is a dated they/them paraphrase; the consensus record (consensus.json:30-32) and copy-notes.json re-bind; the manifest and the handbook regenerate; the handbook receipt gains its regeneration entry. - P2-1: tests/test_new_wsl_definitive_defaults.py gains a relay_record case that isolates DIGEST_LIKE's base64 branch; it fails at c95453a (unexpectedly None) and passes now. The local review's P2 at c95453a (a dated record name refused as a digest) is fixed in the same place: a hex run counts as a digest only when it mixes digits and letters a-f, with a hex-prefix case. - P2-2: tests/test_owner_quote_publication.py also flags an attribution without a speech word (the owner, a colon, then a quote mark) and single-quoted owner words (a typographic or a word-opening straight single quote), with synthetic cases including plain apostrophes, which pass. evidence/artifacts/final-architecture-round2-20261004/ verdicts.json:1070 keeps no single-quoted owner words. The ratchet baseline is regenerated: 477 hits in 242 files (names and counts only). Fail-first with this commit's scanner and baseline: at 9371e2a, claude-proposals.md is unlisted and verdicts.json is above its count; at c95453a, the named records of the earlier rounds are unlisted or above their counts. After: 530 tests OK across the readers of these files; the generators' --check exit 0; validate rc 0. No history rewrite. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
5 tasks done
seathatflowsinourveins
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 15, 2026
… sentence-bounded and wrapped detection The command center's adjudication of #1161 at e21a7b6 (2026-10-15T15:49Z, completed 16:20Z with both families' reads). Findings are cited by path:line only. Records (dated they/them paraphrases; hashed bindings, the manifest, the handbook and its receipt follow): - The command center's items: evidence/artifacts/new-wsl-layer-consensus-20261002/wave2-records.json:147 and :274, evidence/artifacts/final-architecture-round2-20261004/verdicts.json:220 and :1160. - The FULL read of the changed files: wave2-records.json:103 held quoted owner wording and is now a dated paraphrase; docs/decisions/2026-10-04-repository-quality-rule.md:7 and docs/decisions/2026-10-04-2604-e2e-fix-wave.md:51 state the 2026-10-01 rule without quoting it. consensus.json and integration-resolutions.json re-bind; the handbook receipt records this regeneration with its previous outputs and reason. Detector (tests/test_owner_quote_publication.py): - A possessive attribution class: the owner's or the user's, then a quoted phrase of two or more words. A string literal's closing delimiter and a quoted dated-paraphrase prefix are not quotations. - GPT fix2 P2 (verdict blocker 2) and the local review's P2 at :73-75: each attribution is matched within one sentence, and Markdown paragraphs, list items and block quotes are read as wrapped prose; a hit is located at the line where the attribution starts. - GPT fix2 P2 (blocker 3) and the local review's P2 at :32: a typographic apostrophe inside a word is not a quote mark. - The local review's P2 at :35: a single closing quote before the speaker is an attribution. - The ratchet baseline is regenerated: 469 hits in 229 files (names and counts only). tests/test_new_wsl_definitive_defaults.py: a dated relay-record name assembles (assemble_manifest.py:395-397; GPT fix2 follow-up 1). Fail-first: the seven new detector cases all fail against e21a7b6's detector and hold now. This commit's scanner and baseline over the e21a7b6 tree report verdicts.json and wave2-records.json above their counts. The GPT reviewer's probe now returns 3 of 3 OK. After: 616 tests OK (3 skipped) across the readers of these files; the three generators' --check exit 0; validate rc 0. Outside the changed files, for the first burn-down PR: GPT fix2's P1 locators (three baselined preregistration records) and its P3 follow-ups 2 and 3. No history rewrite. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
5 tasks done
seathatflowsinourveins
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 15, 2026
… of the custody ruling restated in other words The GPT fix3r read of #1161 at fd51f88 (2026-10-15, CHANGES_REQUESTED, one P1) found that evidence/artifacts/new-wsl-layer-consensus-20261002/wave2-records.json:274 (layers.custody.ruling.changes["12"]) kept the earlier wording under a paraphrase label; the command center's MICRO read at fd51f88 had listed the same locator as a follow-up. Findings are cited by locator only. - The field now states the owner's 2026-09-26 decision in other words, dated and attributed (they/them). Measured against the field at the PR's base, the attributed clause shares no run of two or more non-numeric words; the only shared run is the date. The line count is unchanged, so locators into the file hold. - Bindings follow: consensus.json (4) and integration-resolutions.json (1) re-bind the record's sha256; assemble_manifest.py rewrites definitive-manifest.json; build_new_wsl_handbook.py --write regenerates the handbook, and its receipt records the regeneration with the previous outputs and the reason; manifests/evidence.json re-registers the changed files. - tests/test_new_wsl_handbook.py OwnerQuotationTests: the custody change carries the new public paraphrase and no paraphrase label over earlier wording. It failed before the change (1 failure of 5) and holds now. After: 741 tests OK (3 skipped) across the readers of these files; build_new_wsl_handbook.py --check, assemble_manifest.py --check and render_tables.py --check exit 0; validate rc 0; the reviewer's fix3r detector probe returns 7 of 7 on fd51f88 and on this tree. The read's three P3s go to the body's Follow-ups. No history rewrite. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
seathatflowsinourveins
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 15, 2026
… bounds, and evidence.json in the repository writer's form The command center's adjudication of #1161 at 9bcb813 (2026-10-15T21:59Z, bound to the local Codex review's review_output.json and to its Claude-family delta read, PASS) ruled two fix-now items under the scope-lock rule (claims false at the head). The GPT fix4 delta read of fd51f88..9bcb813 is an ACK with no new finding. Findings are cited by locator only. - tests/test_owner_quote_publication.py:1 and :7-8 claimed every tracked text file is checked and every new quotation fails. The docstring now states the three bounds, each naming its Follow-up: a file over MAX_BYTES (8 MB) is not scanned; several attributions in one line or paragraph count once (C1, the detector's restructure); a block-quote introduction wrapped across lines is not detected (C3, a CommonMark parser as a PROPOSAL routed to the layer-resolution protocol). - manifests/evidence.json: 13 rows outside W:274 had gone from \u escapes to raw UTF-8, because the registration helper wrote raw UTF-8 and that round ran only --check. The file is rewritten by scripts/evidence_manifest.py --write (:67), so the tree matches what the next write produces; the edited test file is re-registered. No behaviour changes. C1, C3 and the C2 bound are Follow-ups in the body, with W:274's narrowing of the decision to paid search against verdicts.json:1173 and :1186, catalogs/sota-convergence/manifest-20260929.json:4720 and returns.json:17191 and :17329. After: 228 tests OK across the detector's and the handbook's readers; validate rc 0. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
5 of 6 tasks
seathatflowsinourveins
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 16, 2026
…on per handbook-receipt history entry The local Codex re-review of #1161 at e0ff2ab (two P2s) and the command center's adjudication of it (2026-10-15, addendum 01 to its adjudication at 9bcb813); the GPT fix5 delta read of 9bcb813..e0ff2ab is an ACK. Findings are cited by locator only. - P2-B, fixed: commit 3 of this change (9371e2a) attached the relay-contract supersession reason to the historical ROW70 entry of evidence/artifacts/new-wsl-handbook-20261001/receipt.json (previous_outputs[7]) as well as to its own entry ([20]), so two output pairs claimed one supersession. [7] is restored to its bytes at the base; the 19 entries the base holds are now equal to it. tests/test_new_wsl_handbook.py gains test_each_supersession_reason_binds_only_the_entry_it_supersedes: one reason per entry, and a reason that cites a date sits on an entry superseded no earlier. It failed at e0ff2ab (entries 7 and 20 share a reason) and holds now. - P2-A, a Follow-up in the body: the detector's JSON path keys on owner_decision tokens, the class the adjudication sent to the restructure; a scan of the tracked JSON finds no such object on real content. manifests/evidence.json re-registers the two edited files through scripts/evidence_manifest.py --write. After: 229 tests OK across the detector's and the handbook's readers; validate rc 0. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
5 tasks done
seathatflowsinourveins
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 16, 2026
…'s introduction check missed, and that check widened The command center's ruling of 2026-10-16 on #1161 at 768d9cc: the co-op's GPT count read found four real instances of shape 1, all escaping the block-quote introduction check (tests/test_owner_quote_publication.py:66), a P1; shape 2 (:61) has none on real content and stays a Follow-up. The locators came from the GPT locator read loc1-pr1161 by position only. Findings are cited by locator only. - docs/decisions/2026-09-25-top-rule-sota-sources.md:22 and docs/decisions/2026-10-05-official-upstream-never-rebuild.md:17 carried directive wording under an owner introduction. Both are now dated paraphrases in other words, the first citing the rule's own text by commit (AGENTS.md at 7bbb021, the commit that added the record). - docs/decisions/2026-10-03-currency-wave-w1.md:227 (a retained repair report) and evidence/artifacts/delegated-decisions-20260928/coordination.md:13 named a role or a lane as an owner. They now name it as a lane; the report's header records the change and its date. - Bindings: the starred-convergence captures record these files' sha256 at their own dates and stay unchanged (this change's convention); evidence/artifacts/engine-currency-20261013/context.json binds its file at commit 993cc89. - Detector: a block quote is attributed by the paragraph or list item just above it, read whole, when that names the owner and ends with a colon, with or without a speech word, and a blank quote line is neither checked nor read as an introduction. This also closes C3 (an introduction wrapped across lines). test_a_block_quote_introduced_by_a_wrapped_ sentence_is_found holds synthetic cases and controls only: four cases failed at 768d9cc and hold now. - Baseline: docs/decisions/2026-10-03-compaction-window-ab-retirement.md goes from 2 to 3 (a block quote in a file already listed for the burn-down) and the detector's own synthetic fixtures from 30 to 35. After: tests.test_owner_quote_publication OK; tests.test_ecosystem_manifest and tests.test_starred_convergence 124 OK; validate rc 0. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
The GPT read of #1128 at bd3eecf (blocker 1, P1) found owner quotation spans in the generated handbook's agent-messaging record. They came from the layer-consensus record: assemble_manifest.py copies its rows and amendments into the definitive manifest, and build_new_wsl_handbook.py copies each manifest slot whole into the handbook, so the fix is in the canonical input and the outputs are regenerated from it. Layer-consensus record (consensus.json): six owner quotation spans in five fields become dated, attributed paraphrases of the form: the owner, <date> (paraphrased): ..., with the date taken from each record's own context: - authorization: verbatim -> paraphrase (2026-10-02) - amend_rows[4] agent-messaging amendment: owner_verbatim -> owner_paraphrase (2026-10-02); its decision, text, arms and experiment contract are unchanged - wave2 context-supply interim authority: verbatim -> paraphrase (2026-10-03) - wave5 agent-messaging owner default: two spans in its reason (2026-10-02 and 2026-10-03) and one in its posture (2026-10-03); the public record of the answer stays linked by URL Regenerated through the existing generators: - assemble_manifest.py (write; --check exit 0): definitive-manifest.json - render_tables.py --check: the 2026-10-01 record's tables stay current - build_new_wsl_handbook.py --write, then --check exit 0: docs/new-wsl-handbook.json and docs/new-wsl-handbook.md The handbook loses five owner spans: the four the read named (base lines 851, 933, 934) and one in the context-supply record's overturned interim (base line 2383), which the read did not list. Bindings: the handbook receipt's current outputs, a regenerations entry and a previous_outputs entry; manifests/evidence.json re-registers the eight changed hashed files; scripts/validate.py passes. Regression: tests/test_new_wsl_handbook.py OwnerQuotationTests checks by structure, with invented prose only: a field that holds the owner's words, or a sentence that attributes a double-quoted span to the owner or the user, fails; a dated paraphrase and separately defined protocol or contract text pass. Against the base tree it fails with 13 locators (consensus record 5, manifest 4, handbook 4); after the change all three tests pass. tests/test_new_wsl_definitive_defaults.py reads the paraphrase fields, checks the consensus decision record with the same attribution rule, and its wave-3 relay check no longer holds any of the owner's words (it checks the record's block quote instead). assemble_manifest.py: comment only, the interim authority now carries a dated paraphrase. Not changed: the owner batches' authority.verbatim fields (wave3, wave4, wave5) stay in consensus.json. assemble_manifest.py requires them (OWNER_AUTHORITY_FIELDS, line 389) and refuses a batch whose hashed relaying decision record does not contain them (check_owner_batch, lines 542-544); they never reach the manifest or the handbook. Changing that relay contract needs its own ruling. The regression keeps exactly those paths, and only while the assembler requires the field. This supersedes, for the canonical inputs, the integration resolution that chose exact quotation (evidence/artifacts/ final-architecture-round2-20261004/integration-resolutions.json:543, :630, :801). No history rewrite: earlier commits keep the old text. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
…er's words; remove #1159's exemption Command center ruling 2026-10-15T12:38Z (P1). The no-owner-quote rule of 2026-10-14 supersedes, for every published file, the round-2 resolution to quote the owner exactly (evidence/artifacts/final-architecture-round2-20261004/integration-resolutions.json:543, :630, :801). - assemble_manifest.py: OWNER_AUTHORITY_FIELDS swaps verbatim for paraphrase and relay_record. check_owner_batch requires the paraphrase to begin "the owner, <date_utc> (paraphrased): " and the committed, hash-bound relaying decision record to state it; relay_record names the command center's private record by name and location only, and anything digest-like there is refused (a hash of private bytes would break digest custody, and a short owner sentence is open to guess-and-check). - consensus.json: the wave3, wave4 and wave5 authority.verbatim fields become dated paraphrases plus relay_record; the three batches re-bind to their decision records' new sha256. - The three relaying decision records (2026-10-04 token-full-stack-owner-default, 2604-e2e-fix-wave, final-architecture-round2) state the paraphrases; a second owner quotation in the round-2 record (a 2026-10-03 answer) is paraphrased too. - The definitive manifest and the handbook are regenerated through their builders; the handbook receipt gains a regeneration entry. - tests: #1159's temporary exemption (relay_contract_paths) is removed; a verbatim field in an owner decision is always a finding; test_the_relaying_decision_records_carry_the_paraphrase_not_the_words; the assembler's negative controls cover a missing paraphrase, the words coming back as a verbatim key, an undated paraphrase, a digest in relay_record and a paraphrase the record does not state. Fail-before (#1159 head a3d53be with these tests): the canonical-inputs check lists the three verbatim fields, the records test fails on all three batches, and the assembler test errors. After: the 8 modules that read these files, 615 tests OK (3 skips gated on tools); assemble_manifest --check, render_tables --check and build_new_wsl_handbook --check exit 0; validate rc 0. No history rewrite: earlier commits keep the old text. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
…ecome dated paraphrases; a tree-wide scanner with a ratchet baseline The command center's FULL read of #1161 at c95453a (CHANGES_REQUESTED) and its split ruling of 2026-10-15T13:25Z. P1, the named records (each paraphrased with its date and they/them, with a supersession note beside the change): - wave2-records.json owner_decisions[1]: verbatim -> paraphrase, plus publication_note; - claude-request.md: the opening quotation and the quotation in item 3; - docs/decisions/2026-10-04-repository-quality-rule.md: the block quote; - new-wsl-fix-wave-20261004/repository-quality-promptfoo.json and final-architecture-round2-20261004/verdicts.json: owner_words -> owner_paraphrase plus publication_note; verdicts.json's correction (Q11), its 1067 reason and its 2541 claim lose their quotations; - docs/decisions/2026-10-04-upstream-surface-watch.md: the requirement's quotation; - the consensus record's claim that the rule record quotes the rule verbatim, regenerated into the manifest and the handbook. Re-bound: the consensus record's hashed records, copy-notes.json (sha256 and a replacement entry) and integration-resolutions.json's measured_record; the manifest and the handbook through their builders; the handbook receipt gains a regeneration entry, and every previous_outputs entry now has its reason (P3, receipt.json:1308). Dated historical captures (starred-protected-20261011, starred-convergence-20261010, the 2026-10-08 g6c-b record, the 2026-10-06 fix-wave receipts, the 2026-10-07 gateway relabel) keep the hashes of their own dates. P2: DIGEST_LIKE also refuses a named algorithm in any case (sha256, or sha512- as in SRI integrity) and a base64 run (20+ characters with a digit and both letter cases), so a session name such as native-agent-stack-99 still passes. P3: the relay paraphrases are in they/them; an interim owner decision and a relayed owner_decisions entry refuse an owner-words key at runtime; a paraphrase that is only its prefix is refused. Tree-wide scanner (tests/test_owner_quote_publication.py): every tracked text file, owner-attribution markers (the owner, or the user as these records call the owner, near a speech word and a quote mark; a verbatim claim; an owner-words key; a verbatim key in a file of owner decisions; a block quote introduced as owner speech), JSON string values read one by one so their delimiters are not quotation, and dated-paraphrase block quotes skipped. tests/fixtures/owner-quote-baseline.json holds per-file counts (names and counts only) for the burn-down PRs: an unlisted file must be clean and a count changes only with the baseline. Fail-before: the scanner at c95453a with this baseline lists the named records as unlisted files with hits, and the assembler's new negative controls fail there. After: tests.test_owner_quote_publication, test_new_wsl_definitive_defaults, test_new_wsl_handbook, test_research_entry and the other readers of these files OK; assemble_manifest --check, render_tables --check and build_new_wsl_handbook --check exit 0; validate rc 0. No history rewrite. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
…oted owner words, a wider detector, dated record names The command center's adjudication of #1161 at 9371e2a (third round, scope-locked). Findings cited by path:line. - P1: evidence/artifacts/new-wsl-layer-consensus-20261002/claude-proposals.md:88 held an attributed owner sentence with no speech word. It is a dated they/them paraphrase; the consensus record (consensus.json:30-32) and copy-notes.json re-bind; the manifest and the handbook regenerate; the handbook receipt gains its regeneration entry. - P2-1: tests/test_new_wsl_definitive_defaults.py gains a relay_record case that isolates DIGEST_LIKE's base64 branch; it fails at c95453a (unexpectedly None) and passes now. The local review's P2 at c95453a (a dated record name refused as a digest) is fixed in the same place: a hex run counts as a digest only when it mixes digits and letters a-f, with a hex-prefix case. - P2-2: tests/test_owner_quote_publication.py also flags an attribution without a speech word (the owner, a colon, then a quote mark) and single-quoted owner words (a typographic or a word-opening straight single quote), with synthetic cases including plain apostrophes, which pass. evidence/artifacts/final-architecture-round2-20261004/ verdicts.json:1070 keeps no single-quoted owner words. The ratchet baseline is regenerated: 477 hits in 242 files (names and counts only). Fail-first with this commit's scanner and baseline: at 9371e2a, claude-proposals.md is unlisted and verdicts.json is above its count; at c95453a, the named records of the earlier rounds are unlisted or above their counts. After: 530 tests OK across the readers of these files; the generators' --check exit 0; validate rc 0. No history rewrite. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
… sentence-bounded and wrapped detection The command center's adjudication of #1161 at e21a7b6 (2026-10-15T15:49Z, completed 16:20Z with both families' reads). Findings are cited by path:line only. Records (dated they/them paraphrases; hashed bindings, the manifest, the handbook and its receipt follow): - The command center's items: evidence/artifacts/new-wsl-layer-consensus-20261002/wave2-records.json:147 and :274, evidence/artifacts/final-architecture-round2-20261004/verdicts.json:220 and :1160. - The FULL read of the changed files: wave2-records.json:103 held quoted owner wording and is now a dated paraphrase; docs/decisions/2026-10-04-repository-quality-rule.md:7 and docs/decisions/2026-10-04-2604-e2e-fix-wave.md:51 state the 2026-10-01 rule without quoting it. consensus.json and integration-resolutions.json re-bind; the handbook receipt records this regeneration with its previous outputs and reason. Detector (tests/test_owner_quote_publication.py): - A possessive attribution class: the owner's or the user's, then a quoted phrase of two or more words. A string literal's closing delimiter and a quoted dated-paraphrase prefix are not quotations. - GPT fix2 P2 (verdict blocker 2) and the local review's P2 at :73-75: each attribution is matched within one sentence, and Markdown paragraphs, list items and block quotes are read as wrapped prose; a hit is located at the line where the attribution starts. - GPT fix2 P2 (blocker 3) and the local review's P2 at :32: a typographic apostrophe inside a word is not a quote mark. - The local review's P2 at :35: a single closing quote before the speaker is an attribution. - The ratchet baseline is regenerated: 469 hits in 229 files (names and counts only). tests/test_new_wsl_definitive_defaults.py: a dated relay-record name assembles (assemble_manifest.py:395-397; GPT fix2 follow-up 1). Fail-first: the seven new detector cases all fail against e21a7b6's detector and hold now. This commit's scanner and baseline over the e21a7b6 tree report verdicts.json and wave2-records.json above their counts. The GPT reviewer's probe now returns 3 of 3 OK. After: 616 tests OK (3 skipped) across the readers of these files; the three generators' --check exit 0; validate rc 0. Outside the changed files, for the first burn-down PR: GPT fix2's P1 locators (three baselined preregistration records) and its P3 follow-ups 2 and 3. No history rewrite. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
… of the custody ruling restated in other words The GPT fix3r read of #1161 at fd51f88 (2026-10-15, CHANGES_REQUESTED, one P1) found that evidence/artifacts/new-wsl-layer-consensus-20261002/wave2-records.json:274 (layers.custody.ruling.changes["12"]) kept the earlier wording under a paraphrase label; the command center's MICRO read at fd51f88 had listed the same locator as a follow-up. Findings are cited by locator only. - The field now states the owner's 2026-09-26 decision in other words, dated and attributed (they/them). Measured against the field at the PR's base, the attributed clause shares no run of two or more non-numeric words; the only shared run is the date. The line count is unchanged, so locators into the file hold. - Bindings follow: consensus.json (4) and integration-resolutions.json (1) re-bind the record's sha256; assemble_manifest.py rewrites definitive-manifest.json; build_new_wsl_handbook.py --write regenerates the handbook, and its receipt records the regeneration with the previous outputs and the reason; manifests/evidence.json re-registers the changed files. - tests/test_new_wsl_handbook.py OwnerQuotationTests: the custody change carries the new public paraphrase and no paraphrase label over earlier wording. It failed before the change (1 failure of 5) and holds now. After: 741 tests OK (3 skipped) across the readers of these files; build_new_wsl_handbook.py --check, assemble_manifest.py --check and render_tables.py --check exit 0; validate rc 0; the reviewer's fix3r detector probe returns 7 of 7 on fd51f88 and on this tree. The read's three P3s go to the body's Follow-ups. No history rewrite. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
… bounds, and evidence.json in the repository writer's form The command center's adjudication of #1161 at 9bcb813 (2026-10-15T21:59Z, bound to the local Codex review's review_output.json and to its Claude-family delta read, PASS) ruled two fix-now items under the scope-lock rule (claims false at the head). The GPT fix4 delta read of fd51f88..9bcb813 is an ACK with no new finding. Findings are cited by locator only. - tests/test_owner_quote_publication.py:1 and :7-8 claimed every tracked text file is checked and every new quotation fails. The docstring now states the three bounds, each naming its Follow-up: a file over MAX_BYTES (8 MB) is not scanned; several attributions in one line or paragraph count once (C1, the detector's restructure); a block-quote introduction wrapped across lines is not detected (C3, a CommonMark parser as a PROPOSAL routed to the layer-resolution protocol). - manifests/evidence.json: 13 rows outside W:274 had gone from \u escapes to raw UTF-8, because the registration helper wrote raw UTF-8 and that round ran only --check. The file is rewritten by scripts/evidence_manifest.py --write (:67), so the tree matches what the next write produces; the edited test file is re-registered. No behaviour changes. C1, C3 and the C2 bound are Follow-ups in the body, with W:274's narrowing of the decision to paid search against verdicts.json:1173 and :1186, catalogs/sota-convergence/manifest-20260929.json:4720 and returns.json:17191 and :17329. After: 228 tests OK across the detector's and the handbook's readers; validate rc 0. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
…on per handbook-receipt history entry The local Codex re-review of #1161 at e0ff2ab (two P2s) and the command center's adjudication of it (2026-10-15, addendum 01 to its adjudication at 9bcb813); the GPT fix5 delta read of 9bcb813..e0ff2ab is an ACK. Findings are cited by locator only. - P2-B, fixed: commit 3 of this change (9371e2a) attached the relay-contract supersession reason to the historical ROW70 entry of evidence/artifacts/new-wsl-handbook-20261001/receipt.json (previous_outputs[7]) as well as to its own entry ([20]), so two output pairs claimed one supersession. [7] is restored to its bytes at the base; the 19 entries the base holds are now equal to it. tests/test_new_wsl_handbook.py gains test_each_supersession_reason_binds_only_the_entry_it_supersedes: one reason per entry, and a reason that cites a date sits on an entry superseded no earlier. It failed at e0ff2ab (entries 7 and 20 share a reason) and holds now. - P2-A, a Follow-up in the body: the detector's JSON path keys on owner_decision tokens, the class the adjudication sent to the restructure; a scan of the tracked JSON finds no such object on real content. manifests/evidence.json re-registers the two edited files through scripts/evidence_manifest.py --write. After: 229 tests OK across the detector's and the handbook's readers; validate rc 0. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
…'s introduction check missed, and that check widened The command center's ruling of 2026-10-16 on #1161 at 768d9cc: the co-op's GPT count read found four real instances of shape 1, all escaping the block-quote introduction check (tests/test_owner_quote_publication.py:66), a P1; shape 2 (:61) has none on real content and stays a Follow-up. The locators came from the GPT locator read loc1-pr1161 by position only. Findings are cited by locator only. - docs/decisions/2026-09-25-top-rule-sota-sources.md:22 and docs/decisions/2026-10-05-official-upstream-never-rebuild.md:17 carried directive wording under an owner introduction. Both are now dated paraphrases in other words, the first citing the rule's own text by commit (AGENTS.md at 7bbb021, the commit that added the record). - docs/decisions/2026-10-03-currency-wave-w1.md:227 (a retained repair report) and evidence/artifacts/delegated-decisions-20260928/coordination.md:13 named a role or a lane as an owner. They now name it as a lane; the report's header records the change and its date. - Bindings: the starred-convergence captures record these files' sha256 at their own dates and stay unchanged (this change's convention); evidence/artifacts/engine-currency-20261013/context.json binds its file at commit 993cc89. - Detector: a block quote is attributed by the paragraph or list item just above it, read whole, when that names the owner and ends with a colon, with or without a speech word, and a blank quote line is neither checked nor read as an introduction. This also closes C3 (an introduction wrapped across lines). test_a_block_quote_introduced_by_a_wrapped_ sentence_is_found holds synthetic cases and controls only: four cases failed at 768d9cc and hold now. - Baseline: docs/decisions/2026-10-03-compaction-window-ab-retirement.md goes from 2 to 3 (a block quote in a file already listed for the burn-down) and the detector's own synthetic fixtures from 30 to 35. After: tests.test_owner_quote_publication OK; tests.test_ecosystem_manifest and tests.test_starred_convergence 124 OK; validate rc 0. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
…h main, and its baseline is measured GPT's fix7 micro at 1fb477b (cc-reads-20261005/fix7-pr1161/GPT-VERDICT-1fb477b50.md) and the count2 re-check (count2-pr1161/GPT-VERDICT-1fb477b50.md) give the same P2 blocker: the ratchet failed on the merged tree (tests/test_owner_quote_publication.py:217; a file main added since, returns.json:902). The command center ruled ONE fold at 2026-10-16T05:13Z. - The branch is rebased once onto main 30542e7. The range-diff shows nine `=` pairs, and git merge-tree rc 0. - measured_counts() and write_baseline() rebuild tests/fixtures/owner-quote-baseline.json from scan() of the tree that lands, with no hand-set number (`python3 tests/test_owner_quote_publication.py --write-baseline`). On the rebased tree it measures 230 files and 478 hits. The one change is a file main added, with 3 hits. - test_the_ratchet_holds_on_the_merge_with_main runs the ratchet on `git merge-tree --write-tree` of the default branch and HEAD, extracted outside the checkout. It is skipped only where no default branch is fetched. Fail-first: the new test fails with the earlier baseline on this merge (the added file, 3 != absent). After the fold, the module passes 5 tests, the reviewer probe 7/7 (counts only), tests.test_new_wsl_handbook 94, and test_new_wsl_definitive_defaults, test_validate, test_evidence_manifest and test_registry_rows 248. validate rc 0; build_new_wsl_handbook --check rc 0. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
seathatflowsinourveins
force-pushed
the
claude/cc-native-practice-relay-contract-scrub-20261015
branch
from
October 16, 2026 05:53
1fb477b to
d4e3b6a
Compare
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Scope
30542e705(main; the branch was rebased once onto it on 2026-10-16, see Commit 10; the earlier base was420452059). This PR lands the scrub in five commits. The first two area3d53be4(the paraphrase of the canonical inputs and the regenerated manifest and handbook, formerly Paraphrase owner quotations in the new-WSL layer-consensus record and regenerate the manifest and handbook #1159) andc95453a1(the relay contract); the three after them follow the command center's reads, below. On the command center's direction of 2026-10-15T13:01Z, Paraphrase owner quotations in the new-WSL layer-consensus record and regenerate the manifest and handbook #1159 is closed as superseded by this PR, and Raise the Claude Code floor to 2.1.300 and record its source commit as the run pin #1128 rebases onto it.lane:foundationevidence/artifacts/new-wsl-definitive-defaults-20261001/assemble_manifest.py, plus the regenerateddefinitive-manifest.json;evidence/artifacts/new-wsl-layer-consensus-20261002/consensus.json;docs/decisions/2026-10-04-token-full-stack-owner-default.md,2026-10-04-2604-e2e-fix-wave.mdand2026-10-04-final-architecture-round2.md;docs/new-wsl-handbook.jsonand.md(regenerated), plus the handbook receipt;tests/test_new_wsl_handbook.pyandtests/test_new_wsl_definitive_defaults.py;manifests/evidence.json.Commit 1 (
a3d53be4, formerly #1159): the canonical inputs and the generated filesWhat changes:
consensus.jsonhad six owner quotation spans in five fields. Each becomes a dated, attributed paraphrase ("the owner, (paraphrased): …", they/them), dated from the record's own context. The agent-messaging amendment's decision, text, arms and experiment contract are unchanged.assemble_manifest.pywrote the manifest (5 spans;--checkexit 0), andrender_tables.py --checkexits 0.build_new_wsl_handbook.py --write, then--check, regenerated the handbook (5 spans). That covers the read's four at base:851,:933and:934, plus one more at the context-supply record.regenerationsentry and aprevious_outputsentry.OwnerQuotationTests, intests/test_new_wsl_handbook.py, uses invented prose only. It rejects any field that holds the owner's words, and any sentence that attributes a quoted span to the owner, in the canonical inputs and the generated handbook. Dated paraphrases and protocol or contract text pass. The existing owner-quote check intests/test_new_wsl_definitive_defaults.pynow uses the same rule.Its temporary exemption (removed by the second commit): three owner-verbatim fields stay in
consensus.json: the wave3, wave4 and wave5authority.verbatim.assemble_manifest.pyrequires them (OWNER_AUTHORITY_FIELDS), andcheck_owner_batchrefuses a batch whose hash-bound relaying decision record lacks them.claude/cc-native-practice-relay-contract-scrub-20261015.Commit 2 (
c95453a1): the relay contractThe contract:
OWNER_AUTHORITY_FIELDSswapsverbatimfor two fields:paraphrase: dated, they/them, beginning "the owner, <date_utc> (paraphrased): ";relay_record: the command center's private record that holds the exact words, by name and location only.check_owner_batchkeeps its sha256 binding to the committed relaying decision record and checks that the record states the paraphrase. Anything digest-like inrelay_recordis refused. A hash of the private record's bytes would break digest custody, and a short owner sentence is open to guess-and-check (the command center accepted this correction to its first wording). The exact words stay only in the private record; a local check outside CI can compare them.Commit 3 (
9371e2ad): repo-wide, from the command center's FULL read at c95453aThe CC ruled the split at 2026-10-15T13:25Z: this commit now, and burn-down PRs by area after it. Owner text is cited here by location only.
wave2-records.jsonowner_decisions[1], whereverbatimbecomesparaphrase;claude-request.md(the opening paragraph and item 3);docs/decisions/2026-10-04-repository-quality-rule.md;repository-quality-promptfoo.json:7andverdicts.json:7, whereowner_wordsbecomesowner_paraphrase;verdicts.json's Q11 correction, its 1067 reason and its 2541 claim;docs/decisions/2026-10-04-upstream-surface-watch.md:19-20;C:1662), regenerated intodefinitive-manifest.jsonand the handbook.copy-notes.jsonandintegration-resolutions.json'smeasured_record;previous_outputsentry (P3,receipt.json:1308).starred-protected-20261011andstarred-convergence-20261010;DIGEST_LIKEalso refuses SRI and named-algorithm forms (sha512-…) and base64 runs of 20+ characters with a digit and both letter cases. A session name such asnative-agent-stack-99still passes.owner_decisionsentry refuse an owner-words key at runtime;tests/test_owner_quote_publication.py): it reads every tracked UTF-8 text file up to 8,000,000 bytes (MAX_BYTES). Two larger published JSON files are skipped; the GPT read at e21a7b6 checked both directly and found no hits.tests/fixtures/owner-quote-baseline.jsonholds per-file counts only: 290 hits in 169 files, the burn-down's input. An unlisted file must be clean, and a count changes only together with the baseline.claude-proposals.md:88and the single-quoted owner words atverdicts.json:1070. Commit 4's detector catches both; its fail-first is below.Commit 4 (
e21a7b61): final, from the command center's adjudication at 9371e2aThis is the third round, scope-locked. Findings are cited by path:line only.
P1:
evidence/artifacts/new-wsl-layer-consensus-20261002/claude-proposals.md:88held an attributed owner sentence with no speech word.consensus.json:30-32) andcopy-notes.jsonre-bind to it.P2-1: a
relay_recordcase isolatesDIGEST_LIKE's base64 branch. It fails at c95453a (unexpectedly None) and passes now.P2-2: the scanner also flags two more forms:
Synthetic cases include plain apostrophes, which pass.
verdicts.json:1070no longer keeps single-quoted owner words. The ratchet baseline is regenerated: 477 hits in 242 files.Fail-first (this commit's scanner and baseline, in scratch exports):
claude-proposals.mdis unlisted andverdicts.jsonis above its count;claude-request.md,claude-proposals.md,repository-quality-promptfoo.jsonandupstream-surface-watch.mdare unlisted, andverdicts.json,wave2-records.jsonand the rule record are above their counts.Results: 530 tests OK across the readers of these files; the generators'
--checkexit 0; validate rc 0.Commit 5 (
fd51f88d): final, from the command center's adjudication at e21a7b6The command center ruled at 2026-10-15T15:49Z and completed the ruling at 16:20Z, with both families' reads at e21a7b6. Its scope is the 23 files this PR changes. Findings are cited by path:line only.
evidence/artifacts/new-wsl-layer-consensus-20261002/wave2-records.json:147and:274, andevidence/artifacts/final-architecture-round2-20261004/verdicts.json:220and:1160, are dated paraphrases.assemble_manifest.py:395-397; also the GPT read's follow-up 1).wave2-records.json:103held quoted owner wording and is now a dated paraphrase.docs/decisions/2026-10-04-repository-quality-rule.md:7anddocs/decisions/2026-10-04-2604-e2e-fix-wave.md:51now state the 2026-10-01 rule without quoting it.tests/test_owner_quote_publication.py)::73-75).:32).:35).consensus.jsonandintegration-resolutions.json;verdicts.jsonandwave2-records.jsonabove their counts.--checkexit 0; validate rc 0.Supersession: the no-owner-quote rule of 2026-10-14 supersedes, for every published file, the round-2 resolution to quote the owner exactly (
evidence/artifacts/final-architecture-round2-20261004/integration-resolutions.json:543,:630,:801). #1159 applied it to the generated files; this PR applies it to the relay contract and its decision records.No history rewrite: earlier commits keep the old text, and this diff necessarily shows the removed lines.
Commit 6 (
9bcb8133): blocker, from the GPT fix3r read at fd51f88The GPT fix3r read at fd51f88 (2026-10-15, CHANGES_REQUESTED, one P1; the command center released this commit at 2026-10-15T20:45Z). Findings are cited by locator only.
evidence/artifacts/new-wsl-layer-consensus-20261002/wave2-records.json:274(layers.custody.ruling.changes["12"]) kept earlier wording under a paraphrase label. It now states the owner's 2026-09-26 decision in other words, dated and attributed. Against the field at the PR's base, the attributed clause shares no run of two or more non-numeric words. The line count is unchanged.consensus.json(4) andintegration-resolutions.json(1); the manifest and the handbook through their builders; the handbook receipt gains this regeneration with its previous outputs and reason;manifests/evidence.json.tests/test_new_wsl_handbook.pyOwnerQuotationTests gains a check of the custody change's public text. It failed at fd51f88 (1 of 5) and holds now.--checkexit 0; validate rc 0;tests.test_pre_push_gateOK on the committed tree; the reviewer's fix3r detector probe returns 7 of 7 on fd51f88 and on this head.Commit 7 (
e0ff2abb): the adjudicated fold at 9bcb813The command center's adjudication of #1161 at 9bcb813 (2026-10-15T21:59Z) followed its delta read (PASS) and the local Codex
re-review after the bounded rounds (three P2s, no P0/P1). The GPT fix4 delta read of fd51f88..9bcb813 is an ACK. Findings are
cited by locator only.
tests/test_owner_quote_publication.py:1,:7-8) now states itsthree bounds, each naming its Follow-up below.
manifests/evidence.jsonis rewritten byscripts/evidence_manifest.py --write(
:67), which restores 13 rows'\uescapes that the previous round's registration had written as raw UTF-8.tests.test_pre_push_gate29 OK on the committed tree.Commit 8 (
768d9cc0): the adjudicated fold at e0ff2abThe local Codex re-review at e0ff2ab (two P2s, no P0/P1) and the command center's adjudication of it (2026-10-15, addendum 01 to
its adjudication at 9bcb813). The GPT fix5 delta read of 9bcb813..e0ff2ab (
coordination/cc-reads-20261005/fix5-pr1161/GPT-VERDICT-e0ff2abb3.md)is an ACK. Findings are cited by locator only.
receipt (
previous_outputs[7]) as well as to its own entry ([20]).[7]is back to its bytes at the base, and the 19 entriesthe base holds are equal to it.
test_each_supersession_reason_binds_only_the_entry_it_supersedesfailed at e0ff2ab (entries 7and 20 shared a reason) and holds now.
tests.test_pre_push_gate29 OK on the committed tree.Commit 9 (
1fb477b5): the P1 fold at 768d9ccThe command center's ruling of 2026-10-16: the co-op's GPT count read at 768d9cc found four real instances of the shape
that escaped the block-quote introduction check (
tests/test_owner_quote_publication.py:66), a P1; the other shape (:61)has none on real content and stays a Follow-up. The positions came from the GPT locator read (
coordination/cc-reads-20261005/loc1-pr1161/).Findings are cited by locator only.
docs/decisions/2026-09-25-top-rule-sota-sources.md:22,docs/decisions/2026-10-05-official-upstream-never-rebuild.md:17): each is now a dated paraphrase in other words.docs/decisions/2026-10-03-currency-wave-w1.md:227, a retained repair report, andevidence/artifacts/delegated-decisions-20260928/coordination.md:13): each now names it as a lane, with the change dated.evidence/artifacts/engine-currency-20261013/context.jsonbinds its file at a commit.ends with a colon, with or without a speech word, and blank quote lines are skipped. This also closes C3. Four synthetic cases
failed at 768d9cc and hold now.
from 30 to 35.
tests.test_ecosystem_manifest,tests.test_starred_convergence)124 OK; validate rc 0;
tests.test_pre_push_gate29 OK on the committed tree.Commit 10 (
d4e3b6ac): the fold at 1fb477b, the ratchet on the merge with mainThis answers GPT's fix7 micro and the count2 re-check at 1fb477b. Both give the same P2 blocker
(
coordination/cc-reads-20261005/fix7-pr1161/andcount2-pr1161/, cited by name and locator only): the ratchet failed onthe merged tree (
tests/test_owner_quote_publication.py:217at 1fb477b; a file that main added since,returns.json:902).The command center ruled ONE fold at 2026-10-16T05:13Z.
30542e705. The range-diff shows nine=pairs, andgit merge-treerc 0. Commits 1 to 9are now
4cd31e8f,bbeb43a7,81afff68,aa6e33a5,7dde9061,ec766080,e556062c,ba0a7af8andfd112c41.The headings above keep their earlier names. The earlier head is kept as a local backup ref.
measured_counts()andwrite_baseline()rebuildtests/fixtures/owner-quote-baseline.jsonfromscan()of the tree that lands, with no hand-set number(
python3 tests/test_owner_quote_publication.py --write-baseline).test_the_ratchet_holds_on_the_merge_with_mainruns the ratchet ongit merge-tree --write-treeof thedefault branch and HEAD, extracted outside the checkout. It is skipped only where no default branch is fetched. With the
earlier baseline it fails on this merge: the added file, 3 hits, unlisted.
tests.test_new_wsl_handbook, 94 OK;test_new_wsl_definitive_defaults,test_validate,test_evidence_manifestandtest_registry_rowstogether,248 OK;
build_new_wsl_handbook --checkrc 0;tests.test_pre_push_gate29 OK on the committed tree.SOTA sources
assemble_manifest.py(OWNER_AUTHORITY_FIELDS,check_owner_batch),render_tables.pyandscripts/build_new_wsl_handbook.py. This is a publication correction with no upstream mechanism.Evidence-class table
syntheticOwnerQuotationTests(fail-before at a3d53be)relay_record, and a record that does not state the paraphrasesyntheticlocal_integrationassemble_manifest.py --check,render_tables.py --check,build_new_wsl_handbook.py --check: exit 0Local commands run
Follow-ups
script, and their intent is not restated here. Lines are as at 1fb477b; the scanner file's lines move at
d4e3b6ac(
:62to:66,:139to:143,:171to:175).tests/test_owner_quote_publication.py:62with this body's:233;tests/test_owner_quote_publication.py:139with this body's:184;docs/harness-defaults.md:123, which is already in the burn-down front's follow-up 2 (live locators intoline-moving files).
tests/test_new_wsl_handbook.py:96withtests/test_owner_quote_publication.py:171.Both pass on the merged tree (the handbook module, 94 OK). Its interaction with WSL install: add no-start mode and host port allocation #1180's generator change (still open)
is checked when WSL install: add no-start mode and host port allocation #1180 lands.
docs/harness-defaults.md:123withtests/test_new_wsl_handbook.py:1397;tests/test_owner_quote_publication.py:139with this body's:239.evidence/artifacts/new-wsl-local-models-20261002/PREREGISTRATION-local-models.md:134-136,evidence/artifacts/prompt-audit-20260927/x9-round3/prereg-r3.draft.json:7andprereg-r3.json:7. They are baselined at one hit each. They are preregistrations, so the burn-down states how a paraphrase keeps their hash bindings;docs/harness-defaults.md:123), and follow-up 3, the scanner's size bound;returns.json:5904,credential-inventory.json:213andopenhands-resolver-isolation.md:919.evidence/artifacts/new-wsl-layer-consensus-20261002/wave2-records.json:274: fixed in 9bcb813 (the GPT fix3r read made it its P1).tests/test_owner_quote_publication.py:79(below).restructured, not given another pattern round);
introductions further from the quote;
wave2-records.json:274narrows the 2026-09-26 decision to paid search; set it againstevidence/artifacts/final-architecture-round2-20261004/verdicts.json:1173and:1186,catalogs/sota-convergence/manifest-20260929.json:4720andevidence/artifacts/landscape-sweep-20260929/returns.json:17191and
:17329.keys on
owner_decisiontokens, so an attribution object without one is not counted. It is the detector-gap class sent to therestructure (rule 4); a scan of the tracked JSON finds no such object on real content (rule 5).
pr1161-768d9cc0/review_output.json, cited by name): two more instances of thesame detector-gap class, at
tests/test_owner_quote_publication.py:61and:66. They go to the detector's restructure withC1, C3 and P2-A (rule 4); no commit. The count-only check of real content for these two instances is run by the GPT family,
which reads this class's review files.
coordination/cc-reads-20261005/fix3r-pr1161/GPT-VERDICT-fd51f88d2.md), three P3s:blueprints/us-equities/one goes to the trading lane:adoption/new-wsl/client-config-map.json:298,345,488blueprints/convergence-practice/local-inference-latest-20260926/results/results.md:188blueprints/us-equities/sim-paper-compare/README.md:522catalogs/sota-convergence/manifest-20260926.json:16879,19225docs/decisions/2026-09-22-github-automation-closure.md:385docs/decisions/2026-09-23-max-effort-default.md:77docs/decisions/2026-09-25-skills-trial-and-usage.md:3docs/decisions/2026-09-25-workstation-sota-refresh.md:336docs/decisions/2026-09-26-codex-worker-lane.md:89docs/decisions/2026-09-28-community-sweep.md:219docs/decisions/2026-09-28-delegated-decisions.md:107docs/decisions/2026-09-28-openhands-resolver-isolation.md:157docs/decisions/2026-10-01-definitive-sota-wsl-program.md:346docs/decisions/2026-10-01-new-wsl-architecture-edition.md:175,182docs/decisions/2026-10-01-new-wsl-definitive-defaults.md:344docs/decisions/2026-10-03-compaction-window-ab-retirement.md:426docs/decisions/2026-10-04-new-wsl-changelog-parity.md:44,57docs/decisions/2026-10-05-macos-ci-advisory.md:13docs/decisions/2026-10-10-landscape-scratch-ownership.md:115evidence/artifacts/currency-wave-w1-20261003/judgments/move-hold-judges.json:33evidence/artifacts/delegated-decisions-20260928/m3/packet.redacted.md:3evidence/artifacts/final-architecture-round2-20261004/landscape-verdicts.json:24evidence/artifacts/landscape-sweep-20260926/lanes.json:5774,6352,7129,10786,12120evidence/artifacts/landscape-sweep-20260926/returns.json:3299,13223,16965,29959,30787evidence/artifacts/mac-stage1-client-layer-20260927/README.md:254,557evidence/artifacts/new-wsl-definitive-defaults-20261001/foundation-definitive.compact.json:387evidence/artifacts/new-wsl-definitive-defaults-20261001/trading/trading-ownership.json:9evidence/artifacts/new-wsl-install-plan-20261002/SOURCES.md:345evidence/artifacts/omniroute-rebuild-20260930/PLAN.md:68evidence/artifacts/omniroute-rebuild-20260930/receipt.json:112evidence/artifacts/sdk-runtime-coverage-20260922/dispatch-frameworks.json:1678evidence/artifacts/skills-trials-20261009/corpus/C10/case-optional-fields/SKILL.md:3evidence/artifacts/sota-finalization-20260930/plan.json:57manifests/stack.json:1940tests/test_native_practice_retired_routes.py:389tools/landing/README.md:124tests/test_owner_quote_publication.py:79, burn-down FRONT): a sentence ends only before a capital letter, so a paraphrase followed by a sentence that opens with a quote mark is read as one sentence. It errs toward a hit, never a miss.catalogs/convergence-practice/sources/starred-protected-20261011.json,starred-convergence-20261010.json) anddocs/decisions/2026-10-08-source-based-records-g6c-b.mdrecord the three decision records' sha256 at their own dates. They are dated historical captures that their tests do not recompute, so they are left unchanged.Checklist
🤖 Generated with Claude Code