Skip to content

Fix #60, incorrect conversion specifier#61

Merged
astrogeco merged 1 commit intonasa:integration-candidatefrom
jphickey:fix-60-format-err
May 8, 2020
Merged

Fix #60, incorrect conversion specifier#61
astrogeco merged 1 commit intonasa:integration-candidatefrom
jphickey:fix-60-format-err

Conversation

@jphickey
Copy link
Contributor

Describe the contribution
Corrects a format mismatch warning on some platforms.

Fixes #60

Testing performed
Build for i686-rtems4.11 and confirm warning is fixed

Expected behavior changes
No impact to behavior

System(s) tested on
i686-rtems4.11 cross build

Contributor Info - All information REQUIRED for consideration of pull request
Joseph Hickey, Vantage Systems, Inc.

@jphickey jphickey added the CCB:Ready Pull request is ready for discussion at the Configuration Control Board (CCB) label Apr 27, 2020
Corrects a format mismatch warning on some platforms.
@jphickey jphickey force-pushed the fix-60-format-err branch from 88c472e to 4e2847e Compare April 27, 2020 20:42
@astrogeco
Copy link
Contributor

CCB 2020-04-29 : APPROVED

@astrogeco astrogeco added CCB-20200429 CCB:Approved Indicates code approval by CCB and removed CCB:Ready Pull request is ready for discussion at the Configuration Control Board (CCB) labels May 5, 2020
@astrogeco astrogeco changed the base branch from master to integration-candidate May 8, 2020 19:20
@astrogeco astrogeco merged commit 7050751 into nasa:integration-candidate May 8, 2020
@skliper skliper added this to the 1.2.0 milestone Jun 1, 2020
@jphickey jphickey deleted the fix-60-format-err branch March 29, 2021 19:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CCB:Approved Indicates code approval by CCB

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Format conversion error in coverage test

3 participants