Skip to content

elf2cfetbl Integration candidate: Caelum+dev1#98

Merged
astrogeco merged 3 commits intonasa:integration-candidatefrom
astrogeco:integration-candidate
Dec 6, 2021
Merged

elf2cfetbl Integration candidate: Caelum+dev1#98
astrogeco merged 3 commits intonasa:integration-candidatefrom
astrogeco:integration-candidate

Conversation

@astrogeco
Copy link
Contributor

@astrogeco astrogeco commented Nov 17, 2021

Describe the contribution
PR #93

Testing performed

sample_app Checks https://github.com/nasa/elf2cfetbl/pull/98/checks
cFS Bundle Checks https://github.com/nasa/cFS/pull/390/checks

Expected behavior changes
See PRs

System(s) tested on
Ubuntu 18.04
RTEMS 4.11
RTEMS 5

Additional context
Part of nasa/cFS#390

Third party code
None

Contributor Info - All information REQUIRED for consideration of pull request
@ArielSAdamsNASA

astrogeco added a commit to astrogeco/cFS that referenced this pull request Nov 18, 2021
Combines:

nasa/cFE#2001
nasa/osal#1191
nasa/PSP#318

nasa/ci_lab#101
nasa/sch_lab#102
nasa/to_lab#112
nasa/sample_app#163
nasa/cFS-GroundSystem#201
nasa/elf2cfetbl#98

Includes:

*cFE*

- nasa/cFE#1663, Use cfe time clock state enum t in cmd/tlm and handling
- nasa/cFE#1973, EVS functional test add for different event types
- nasa/cFE#1954, Patch for recursive event loop
- nasa/cFE#1911, CFE_ES_MemAddOff structure to associated CFE_ES_MemAddress_t and CFE_ES_MemOffset_t
- nasa/cFE#1986, Avoid aliasing warnings
- nasa/cFE#1975, Message ID type improvements
- nasa/cFE#1974, CFE_SB_ValueToMsgId/MsgIdToValue wrappers
- nasa/cFE#1663, Use CFE_TIME_ClockState_Enum_t in cmd/tlm and handling
- nasa/cFE#1995, Consolidate repeated MSG stub setup in sb_UT
- nasa/cFE#1873, Return type conversions in CFE_ES_GetTaskName
- nasa/cFE#1966, Better message type pointer conversion
- nasa/cFE#2002, Replacing hardcoded message limit in TIME services
- nasa/cFE#1909, Use macro in CFE_ResourceId_IsDefined
- nasa/cFE#1999, Checking against IsNewOffset only

*osal*

- nasa/osal#1186, Add Duplicate Check to Local Unit Test
- nasa/osal#1178, Rename OS_XXXTime to OS_XXXLocalTime in comments
- nasa/osal#1168, Fix vxWorks intLib stub aliasing issue
- nasa/osal#1169, Recognize ifdef __cplusplus
- nasa/osal#1180, Remove extern in stub prototypes
- nasa/osal#1112, Add typedef for OSAL status codes

*PSP*

- nasa/PSP#301, Sleep before exit when printing
- nasa/PSP#314, Check the address in PSP get segment stubs

*Tools*

- nasa/elf2cfetbl#89, Check get_sh_entsize(SectionHeader) value
- nasa/elf2cfetbl#93, Check get_sh_entsize(SectionHeader) value
- nasa/cFS-GroundSystem#197, Free Address Info for Leak

*Apps*

- nasa/sch_lab#95, use separate address variable
- nasa/sch_lab#94, Use CFE_MSG_PTR conversion macro
- nasa/sample_app#157, Use CFE_MSG_PTR conversion macro
- nasa/ci_lab#95, Use CFE_MSG_PTR conversion macro
- nasa/to_lab#107, Use CFE_MSG_PTR conversion macro

Co-authored-by: Jacob Hageman       <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Joseph Hickey       <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ariel Adams         <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Paul                <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Zachary Gonzalez    <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Sam Price           <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Shefali Sharma      <[email protected]>
@astrogeco astrogeco marked this pull request as ready for review December 6, 2021 16:10
- Set baseline for cFS-Caelum-rc4: v3.3.0-rc4
- Update mission rev to use 0xFF for development version
@astrogeco astrogeco force-pushed the integration-candidate branch from 31d200b to 8afde1d Compare December 6, 2021 16:16
@astrogeco astrogeco merged commit 16c50d8 into nasa:integration-candidate Dec 6, 2021
astrogeco added a commit to astrogeco/elf2cfetbl that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2022
astrogeco added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2022
HOTFIX #98, Standardize version information
@dzbaker dzbaker added this to the v7.0.0 milestone Feb 12, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants