Fix #1599, documentation for FS APIs that return OSAL codes#1700
Merged
astrogeco merged 1 commit intonasa:integration-candidatefrom Jul 21, 2021
Merged
Fix #1599, documentation for FS APIs that return OSAL codes#1700astrogeco merged 1 commit intonasa:integration-candidatefrom
astrogeco merged 1 commit intonasa:integration-candidatefrom
Conversation
Some FS API calls will pass through failure/status codes directly from OSAL without remapping to CFE Status code values. Note this behavior in the documentation and that it will likely change in a future version of CFE.
jphickey
added
the
CCB:Ready
Contributor
|
CCB:2021-07-21 APPROVED |
astrogeco
added
CCB:Approved
This was referenced Jul 21, 2021
astrogeco
added a commit
to nasa/cFS
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 22, 2021
nasa/cFE#1699, correct return code check nasa/cFE#1700, documentation for FS APIs that return OSAL codes nasa/cFE#1695, Adding coverage tests for cfe_es_apps.c
astrogeco
added a commit
to nasa/cFS
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 29, 2021
Combines: nasa/cFE#1701, v6.8.0-rc1+dev789 nasa/osal#1116, v5.1.0-rc1+dev578 nasa/cFS-GroundSystem#192, v2.2.0-rc1+dev58 Includes: **cFE** nasa/cFE#1699, correct return code check nasa/cFE#1700, documentation for FS APIs that return OSAL codes nasa/cFE#1695, Adding coverage tests for cfe_es_apps.c nasa/cFE#1673, Add File Utility Functional Tests. nasa/cFE#1711, Add custom epoch support to TIME UT nasa/cFE#1720, Requirements update for Caelum nasa/cFE#1721, Add null check to CFE_ES_TaskID_ToIndex. nasa/cFE#1719, scrub command documentation nasa/cFE#1715, Add time arithmetic functional tests nasa/cFE#1704, update docs for CFE_FS_BackgroundFileDumpRequest nasa/cFE#1706, correct return code mismatches **osal** nasa/osal#1114, Add unit test branch coverage **cFS-GroundSystem** nasa/cFS-GroundSystem#185, Update tlm for ES Blockstats/memstats and TBL HK nasa/cFS-GroundSystem#188, * might be referenced before assignment Co-authored-by: Jacob Hageman <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Joseph Hickey <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Alex Campbell <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Jose F Martinez Pedraza <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Niall Mullane <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Paul <[email protected]>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Describe the contribution
Some FS API calls will pass through failure/status codes directly from OSAL without remapping to CFE Status code values.
Note this behavior in the documentation and that it will likely change in a future version of CFE.
Fixes #1599
Testing performed
Build and sanity check CFE, build docs
Expected behavior changes
None (docs only)
System(s) tested on
Ubuntu
Additional context
This just documents the pass through - Behavior should be fixed in #1676 to return a proper CFE status.
Contributor Info - All information REQUIRED for consideration of pull request
Joseph Hickey, Vantage Systems, Inc.