docs(add-codex): drop redundant TTY warning in auth note#2773
Merged
Conversation
The 'don't run via `!` prefix or Bash tool' sentence was redundant with the leading 'Run this in a separate, real terminal — it is interactive.' Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <[email protected]>
This was referenced Jun 16, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
Removes one redundant sentence from the Authenticate note in
.claude/skills/add-codex/SKILL.md— the line warning not to run the auth command through a non-interactive!prefix or Bash tool.Why
It duplicated the leading callout in the same blockquote — "Run this in a separate, real terminal — it is interactive." — which already conveys that the command needs a real TTY.
How it works
Docs-only. The blockquote keeps its leading sentence; no instructions, commands, or behavior change.
How it was tested
Visual diff review — single-line change, surrounding content intact.