Skip to content

cache MFM kernels#161

Merged
JLeliaert merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
feature/cacheMFM
Mar 2, 2018
Merged

cache MFM kernels#161
JLeliaert merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
feature/cacheMFM

Conversation

@JLeliaert

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

cache MFM kernels, similarly to demag kernels

@godsic godsic left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How large is the typical MFM kernel? Most Linux-based systems have quite small /tmp, e.g., half of RAM.

@barnex barnex left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

@barnex

barnex commented Feb 26, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Re @godsic: the kernel is several times larger than a magnetization file. However, one does not necessarily need to use /tmp.

@JLeliaert

JLeliaert commented Feb 26, 2018 via email

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@JLeliaert
JLeliaert merged commit 779a7d4 into master Mar 2, 2018
@JonathanMaes
JonathanMaes deleted the feature/cacheMFM branch October 7, 2024 08:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants