rustc driver detection - includes #1897#2085
Conversation
|
It would be nice to update the commit to explicit why we are doing it |
The commit or the PR desc? Squash merge 'd be fine by me. |
|
The commit please |
de6aa41 to
cbe79c9
Compare
|
Is the above sufficient @sylvestre ? I'd still be in favor of squash this PR, left the two commits separate for no particular reason other than authorship |
Codecov ReportAttention:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2085 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 30.77% 32.17% +1.40%
==========================================
Files 52 53 +1
Lines 19913 20721 +808
Branches 9630 10296 +666
==========================================
+ Hits 6129 6668 +539
+ Misses 7959 7877 -82
- Partials 5825 6176 +351 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
cbe79c9 to
9701f53
Compare
|
The coverage report is obsolete, it actually improved marginally. CC @sylvestre anything missing/insufficient, otherwise I'd merge with rebase? |
If we are not sure it's rustc like and we check -vV output to accept valid rustc drivers. Simplifies #1897 .
Fixes #861