Skip to content

Conversation

@FloorD
Copy link
Contributor

@FloorD FloorD commented Oct 7, 2021

Hey Mostafa! Pawel recommends changing the license for xk6 from AGPL-3 to Apache 2.0 because we want to assure users that they are free to execute extensions in all modes: locally, using k6-operator on their own infrastructure and in the k6-cloud. Apache 2.0 license makes this more explicit.

Hey Mostafa! Pawel recommends changing the license for xk6 from AGPL-3 to Apache 2.0 because we want to assure users that they are free to execute extensions in all modes: locally, using k6-operator on their own infrastructure and in the k6-cloud. Apache 2.0 license makes this more explicit.
@mostafa
Copy link
Owner

mostafa commented Oct 7, 2021

Hey @FloorD,

I'm usually not a fan of relicensing to permissive licenses myself, but happy to cooperate. So I'll merge this.

@mostafa mostafa merged commit f2f51c7 into mostafa:master Oct 7, 2021
mostafa pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 31, 2022
Relicense from AGPL-3 to Apache 2.0 because k6.io wants to assure users that they are free to execute extensions in all modes: locally, using k6-operator on their own infrastructure and in the k6-cloud. Apache 2.0 license makes this more explicit.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants