SEP-2322: Multi Round-Trip Requests #2322
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…emove garbage file
…uestParams — now available on any
client-initiated request, not just tool calls
2. Added typed InputResponse = ElicitResult | CreateMessageResult — InputResponses values are now properly typed
instead of { result: { [key: string]: unknown } }
3. Updated examples — removed the extra result wrapper from TaskInputResponseRequest and
TaskInputResponseRequestParams examples to match the new typed schema
All checks pass: ✅ TypeScript compiles, ✅ JSON schema up to date, ✅ 140/140 examples valid.
Caitie Note: Need to take a look at task-input-response-params.json looks wrong on cursory inspection.
…ngInputRequest → SamplingCreateRequest.
…itRequets these should only be sent as part of IncompleteResponse Objects now
…a JSONRPCIncompleteResultResponse and add examples
…pper in the SEP because InputRequests maps keys directly to the requests so the InputResponses now follows that pattern and there is no benefit to the added wrapper. The only argument for the wrapper would be if we wanted to carry error's alongside results but we do not in these cases. If there is an error the client would retry until the necessary information was retrieved and then send back to the server.
…ut content ordering changes
MRTR schema changes
9 tasks
9 tasks
This was referenced May 26, 2026
6 tasks
This was referenced Jun 6, 2026
This was referenced Jun 10, 2026
5 tasks
9 tasks
Merged
9 tasks
koic
added a commit
to modelcontextprotocol/ruby-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 11, 2026
## Motivation and Context SEP-2322 (modelcontextprotocol/modelcontextprotocol#2322, merged for the 2026-07-28 spec release) introduces Multi Round-Trip Requests: instead of issuing in-flight server-to-client JSON-RPC requests, a server answers with a result whose `resultType` is `"input_required"`, carrying an `inputRequests` map (of `sampling/createMessage`, `roots/list`, and `elicitation/create` request shapes) and an opaque `requestState`; the client fulfills the requests and re-issues the original request with `inputResponses` and the echoed `requestState`. The wire contract (the `resultType` discriminator and the `inputRequests`/`requestState` shape) stayed stable across all three closed TypeScript prototype iterations (typescript-sdk#2062/#2065, the v2-stateless stack, and #2251) and the Python draft (python-sdk#2322), but the server-side suspend/resume mechanism is still unsettled in both SDKs (typescript-sdk#2251 was put on hold on 2026-06-08). This change therefore implements only the stable, additive vocabulary and the client-side recognition, leaving server emission and automatic resumption for a follow-up once the reference design lands: - New `MCP::ResultType` module with `COMPLETE` and `INPUT_REQUIRED` constants documenting the `resultType` values. - `MCP::Client` raises the new `MCP::Client::InputRequiredError` (exposing `input_requests`, `request_state`, and the raw `result`) when any response carries `resultType: "input_required"`, instead of silently returning a non-final result as if it were the answer. The check lives in the shared request path, so every client method is covered. Servers on stable protocol versions never emit `resultType`, so default behavior is unchanged. Part of #382. ## How Has This Been Tested? New tests in `test/mcp/client_test.rb`: - `call_tool` raises `InputRequiredError` for an `input_required` result and exposes `input_requests`, `request_state`, and the full raw result - `call_tool` returns normally when `resultType` is `"complete"` and when it is absent (wire-compat regression for stable-protocol servers) - `list_tools` also raises for `input_required` results, proving the recognition covers the shared request path `bundle exec rake` (tests, RuboCop, and conformance baseline) passes. ## Breaking Changes None for spec-compliant stable servers, which never send `resultType`. A response that does carry `resultType: "input_required"` now raises `MCP::Client::InputRequiredError` instead of being returned as a final result, which was always a misinterpretation of the draft semantics.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a draft SEP for Multi Round-Trip Requests (MRTR) from the Transports Working Group. It is one of the changes discussed and planned at the December 2025 Core Maintainer Meetup. Exploring the Future of MCP Transports Blog
This SEP Is still in draft, Schema changes are proposed but not locked, documentation updates, conformance tests and additional work still to come, but its ready to move out of Transports Working Group and open up to broader feedback.
Authors: Mark D. Roth (@markdroth), Caitie McCaffrey (@CaitieM20), Gabriel Zimmerman (@gjz22)
Motivation and Context
See SEP for details.
How Has This Been Tested?
Conformance Tests: modelcontextprotocol/conformance#188
Breaking Changes
Yes, see SEP for details
Types of changes
Checklist
Additional context