Add Server Instructions blog post and update clients table#1482
Merged
olaservo merged 35 commits intomodelcontextprotocol:mainfrom Nov 4, 2025
Merged
Add Server Instructions blog post and update clients table#1482olaservo merged 35 commits intomodelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
olaservo merged 35 commits intomodelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
Conversation
This was referenced Sep 16, 2025
olaservo
commented
Sep 16, 2025
…tions for server instructions
PederHP
reviewed
Sep 16, 2025
PederHP
reviewed
Sep 16, 2025
PederHP
reviewed
Sep 16, 2025
dend
requested changes
Sep 16, 2025
Co-authored-by: Den Delimarsky <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Den Delimarsky <[email protected]>
olaservo
commented
Sep 17, 2025
olaservo
commented
Sep 17, 2025
Co-authored-by: David Soria Parra <[email protected]>
Member
Author
|
Fyi, I'll wait to resolve the Clients page conflicts again until we know we're closer to merging. |
09766c4 to
33378ec
Compare
- Added Chatbox and ChatFrame clients with Instructions column - Added VT Code client with Instructions column - Updated Amp: Prompts support changed from ❌ to ✅ - Updated AIQL TUUI: Elicitation support changed from ❓ to ✅ - Updated Langflow URL to new organization (langflow-ai) - Preserved Instructions column from add-server-instructions-post-v2 branch
During the merge conflict resolution, these clients were accidentally removed: - ECA - Jenova - JetBrains Junie - LM-Kit.NET - MCP Bundler for MacOS - MCPJam - Mistral AI: Le Chat - Needle - Simtheory - Smithery Playground - Swarms All clients have been re-added in alphabetical order with the Instructions column (set to ❓ for unknown support status, matching the pattern for other clients where support is not yet documented).
dsp-ant
reviewed
Oct 30, 2025
| | Model | With Instructions | Without Instructions | Improvement | | ||
| | ------------------- | ----------------- | -------------------- | ----------- | | ||
| | **GPT-5-Mini** | 8/10 (80%) | 2/10 (20%) | **+60%** | | ||
| | **Claude Sonnet-4** | 9/10 (90%) | 10/10 (100%) | N/A | |
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes I was thinking it was probably random chance that Claude only got 9/10 with instructions in this example, while the other model significantly improved. Would be curious to try a larger sample size to see if it was a consistent pattern.
- Updated publish date from September 22 to November 3, 2025 - Renamed file to match new publish date 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
- Added Avatar Shell section back to client details - Added Avatar Shell link reference 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
dend
approved these changes
Nov 3, 2025
localden
previously approved these changes
Nov 3, 2025
Allow core maintainers to approve general documentation changes, not just specification docs. This gives core maintainers broader authority over all documentation. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
localden
approved these changes
Nov 4, 2025
jonathanhefner
approved these changes
Nov 4, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation and Context
More clients are starting to add support for this feature, and it relates to a lot of use cases I've seen discussed. A few of them are here, but its not totally exhaustive.
Note: original PR is here: #1334
How Has This Been Tested?
Here is the related GitHub server PR with more details on testing: github/github-mcp-server#1091
Breaking Changes
N/A
Types of changes
Checklist
Additional context
Also added Instructions to the Clients feature support matrix with 5 clients listed as supporting so far.