Feedback on formalising the error codes #2212
Agent-Hellboy
started this conversation in
Ideas - General
Replies: 2 comments
-
|
No It's about formalising specific custom error codes of MCP spec. something like https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/errcodes-appendix.html I need feedback before writing a SEP |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
@Agent-Hellboy I've converted #2209 into this discussion thread so that you can collect feedback before writing an SEP (per #2209 (comment)). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I have been reading the new SEP and seeing error code getting chosen out of nowhere, but shouldn't a protocol formalise this, even projects like postgres do this.
A workable formal classing scheme (within -32000..-32099)
Because we only have 100 slots, the most practical structure is two digits:
Suggested class map (example):
it will also help people reason about the error and it's impact , although all error code has same client impact.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions