Skip to content

remove experimental guard for buildkit#37686

Merged
tiborvass merged 2 commits intomoby:masterfrom
andrewhsu:bk-no-ex
Aug 21, 2018
Merged

remove experimental guard for buildkit#37686
tiborvass merged 2 commits intomoby:masterfrom
andrewhsu:bk-no-ex

Conversation

@andrewhsu
Copy link
Contributor

- What I did

Allow buildkit builds to run without experimental mode enabled. Buildkit can now be twiddled with a specific flag #37593

- How I did it

- How to verify it

- Description for the changelog

  • Bring buildkit builds out of experimental.

- A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

🐈

Copy link
Member

@thaJeztah thaJeztah left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

twiddle-dee-twiddle-dom

Copy link
Contributor

@AntaresS AntaresS left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@tiborvass tiborvass left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

experimentalProvider could be removed in a followup.

But since buildkit relies on /session endpoint, that would also need to graduate out of experimental (remove router.Experimental in api/router/session)

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 21, 2018

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@3bd1e7b). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master   #37686   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   36.04%           
=========================================
  Files             ?      609           
  Lines             ?    45041           
  Branches          ?        0           
=========================================
  Hits              ?    16235           
  Misses            ?    26575           
  Partials          ?     2231

@AntaresS
Copy link
Contributor

@tiborvass I think Andrew has updated the PR. Can we get this one in first to avoid conflicts?

Copy link
Contributor

@tiborvass tiborvass left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@thaJeztah
Copy link
Member

Looks like I forgot to follow-up on this one to update the docs; so, with some delay: #40028

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants