-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.9k
Removing old custom RootFS behavior on Windows. #25090
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Nice! LGTM once Janky passes. Has some import fixups required: |
|
LGTM |
|
LGTM, but ping @aaronlehmann @stevvooe for the change in image-specs |
daemon/oci_windows.go
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: extra parentheses
|
Seems fine to me. The base layer stuff was hack that we didn't want to support long-term. It's great that we're able to remove it. Normally there would be backward compatibility concerns, but I know the Windows daemon is not in wide use and there are not many images for it, so if you feel it's okay to get rid of this as a step change, that's fine with me. Needs a rebase though. |
image/spec/v1.1.md
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should probably leave this in or omit from OCI if we don't intend to support it going forward.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point. I'll file an issue against @jstarks to get this removed from OCI.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, looks like you already opened that issue!
Windows base layers are no longer the special "layers+base" type, so we can remove all the special handling for that. Signed-off-by: Stefan J. Wernli <[email protected]>
|
I think it has plenty of lgtms |
@jhowardmsft @jstarks
Windows base layers are no longer the special "layers+base" type, so we can remove all the special handling for that.
Signed-off-by: Stefan J. Wernli [email protected]