-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
Spatial Dropout layer #2564
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Spatial Dropout layer #2564
Conversation
|
In the test case, I am using |
It's not guaranteed that the random number is the same across all systems, the only workaround I can see is to check all possible solutions, if that makes sense? |
|
This looks alright. I'll merge it if you don't have anything else to add (take care of the conflicts as well). |
zoq
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Second approval provided automatically after 24 hours. 👍
birm
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me!
Spatial Dropout Layer
To compare PyTorch/numpy implementation with mlpack/armadillo implementation of the functionality, check this Google Colab notebook.