Skip to content

[Docs]: Add roic.ai to the fundamental data sources table #84

Closed

Description

@infovlad

Affected library

data

Package or documentation version

0.2.0 (current main)

Page or API location

docs/providers/fundamentals.md (Fundamental Data Sources table)

Problem

The fundamentals source table lists vendor APIs with no ml4t-data provider (FMP, SimFin, Intrinio and others) so readers can compare options. It has no row for roic.ai, which offers standardized financial statements, pre-calculated ratios and earnings call transcripts through a REST API with a free tier. Disclosure: I work at roic.ai, so I am asking here first, per the contribution guide, before opening a PR.

Required documentation outcome

If you think it fits, one added row in the same format as the other "No provider" vendors. Proposed text:

| [roic.ai Financial Data API](https://www.roic.ai/api) | Global standardized income statements, balance sheets, and cash flows, 90+ pre-calculated ratios, and earnings call transcripts for 68k+ companies on 70+ exchanges; up to 40+ years of history on paid plans | REST API (JSON or TSV) | API key; free tier with 5 requests per minute and 2 years of history | Standardized statements; the public documentation does not establish filing dates or restatement versioning, so values should not be treated as point-in-time | No |

I'm happy to change the wording or placement, or to drop the idea if the table is meant to stay limited to the current set.

Acceptance criteria

  • The row matches the existing column format and is checked against the linked roic.ai documentation.
  • uv run mkdocs build --strict passes.
  • No other content changes.

AI assistance: Claude Code helped draft this issue and the proposed row; I reviewed the text and the roic.ai facts.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01Uh3g7itMHsafUmTdvo6Ez4

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions