Repository navigation
[Metal] Tune splitk gemm dispatch conditions and partition sizes - #3087
Merged
Merged
Conversation
angeloskath
approved these changes
Feb 1, 2026
angeloskath
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Awesome!
I wonder if it's worth doing sth for the 512x128 @ 512x128 (and maybe 1024x128 @ 512x128 which will also route to the split k now). But generally big impact small change ... awesome!
Member
Author
M4 Max
|
Member
Author
M3 Ultra
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This can dramatically speed up split-k gemms when done in sequence (26x speedup on M3 Ultra for one size 🤯 )
M4 Max
M3 Ultra
Here's the benchmark: