Skip to content

Use codecov for coverage reports #6941

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
DonJayamanne merged 1 commit into from
Aug 12, 2019
Merged

Use codecov for coverage reports #6941

DonJayamanne merged 1 commit into from
Aug 12, 2019

Conversation

@DonJayamanne
Copy link

@DonJayamanne DonJayamanne commented Aug 12, 2019 •
edited
Loading

For #6938

  • Pull request represents a single change (i.e. not fixing disparate/unrelated things in a single PR)
  • Title summarizes what is changing
  • Has a news entry file (remember to thank yourself!)
  • Appropriate comments and documentation strings in the code
  • Has sufficient logging.
  • Has telemetry for enhancements.
  • Unit tests & system/integration tests are added/updated
  • Test plan is updated as appropriate
  • package-lock.json has been regenerated by running npm install (if dependencies have changed)
  • The wiki is updated with any design decisions/details.

@ericsnowcurrently ericsnowcurrently self-requested a review August 12, 2019 17:23
@DonJayamanne DonJayamanne merged commit 9c61d0e into microsoft:master Aug 12, 2019
@DonJayamanne DonJayamanne deleted the codecov branch August 12, 2019 17:46
@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 19, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Reviewers

@ericsnowcurrently ericsnowcurrently Awaiting requested review from ericsnowcurrently

1 more reviewer

@karrtikr karrtikr karrtikr approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@DonJayamanne @karrtikr