Skip to content

Updating ARM code from arm to armv7l#68250

Merged
joaomoreno merged 2 commits intomicrosoft:masterfrom
headmelted:master
Feb 18, 2019
Merged

Updating ARM code from arm to armv7l#68250
joaomoreno merged 2 commits intomicrosoft:masterfrom
headmelted:master

Conversation

@headmelted
Copy link
Contributor

Electron no longer publishes binary releases under the arm tag, and requires use of the armv7l tag instead. This currently breaks builds for 32-bit ARM architectures.

As other parts of the build system (and downstream tools) may still be relying on using the "arm" keyword, I've made it so that "armv7l" is passed to gulp-atom-electron without changing the internal code structure.

Electron no longer publishes binary releases under the arm tag, and requires use of the armv7l tag instead.

As other parts of the build system (and downstream tools) may still be relying on using the "arm" keyword, I've made it so that "armv7l" is passed to gulp-atom-electron without changing the internal code structure.
@kieferrm kieferrm requested a review from bpasero February 11, 2019 00:36
@bpasero bpasero removed their request for review February 11, 2019 07:15
@bpasero bpasero assigned joaomoreno and unassigned bpasero Feb 11, 2019
@headmelted
Copy link
Contributor Author

I've raised a similar change in gulp-atom-electron which may in fact be a better place to address this issue if you don't want to change code in the core

@joaomoreno joaomoreno added this to the February 2019 milestone Feb 18, 2019
@joaomoreno joaomoreno added the engineering VS Code - Build / issue tracking / etc. label Feb 18, 2019
@joaomoreno joaomoreno merged commit 51ad0bb into microsoft:master Feb 18, 2019
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 27, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

engineering VS Code - Build / issue tracking / etc.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants