Skip to content

ConditionBaseAttribute.ShouldRun -> IsConditionMet#6117

Merged
Evangelink merged 2 commits intorel/4.0from
dev/ygerges/conditionbase
Jul 21, 2025
Merged

ConditionBaseAttribute.ShouldRun -> IsConditionMet#6117
Evangelink merged 2 commits intorel/4.0from
dev/ygerges/conditionbase

Conversation

@Youssef1313
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@Youssef1313 Youssef1313 commented Jul 21, 2025

Related to #1285

Closes #6086

@Youssef1313 Youssef1313 force-pushed the dev/ygerges/conditionbase branch from a85671f to 884d516 Compare July 21, 2025 17:01
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@Evangelink Evangelink left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As discussed offline, it would probably be a good opportunity to transform the property into an async method so we avoid the need for a breaking change like we did for test method.

@Youssef1313
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@Evangelink There are some calls under lock that will need to be refactored in some way because await isn't allowed in lock statement.

@Evangelink Evangelink enabled auto-merge (squash) July 21, 2025 20:47
@Evangelink Evangelink merged commit 601d72b into rel/4.0 Jul 21, 2025
8 checks passed
@Evangelink Evangelink deleted the dev/ygerges/conditionbase branch July 21, 2025 20:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Consider renaming ConditionBaseAttribute.ShouldRun to IsConditionMet/IsConditionSatisfied

2 participants