Make sure the virtual viewport doesn't go negative#13052
Merged
2 commits merged intomicrosoft:mainfrom May 9, 2022
Merged
Conversation
Member
|
I'll run a quick test build with this fix :) Thanks for jumping on it! |
Member
|
@msftbot merge this in 5 minutes |
|
Hello @DHowett! Because you've given me some instructions on how to help merge this pull request, I'll be modifying my merge approach. Here's how I understand your requirements for merging this pull request:
If this doesn't seem right to you, you can tell me to cancel these instructions and use the auto-merge policy that has been configured for this repository. Try telling me "forget everything I just told you". |
zadjii-msft
approved these changes
May 9, 2022
|
🎉 Handy links: |
This pull request was closed.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary of the Pull Request
When calculating the position of the virtual bottom after a resize with
reflow, it was possible for it to end up less than the height of the
viewport. This meant that the top of the virtual viewport would be
negative, which resulted in other operations failing further down the
line. This PR updates the virtual bottom calculation to fix that
scenario.
References
This was probably a regression introduced in PR #12972.
PR Checklist
Validation Steps Performed
I wasn't able to replicate the exact case described in issue #13034,
because I don't have Windows 11, so can't configure the default
terminal. However, I was able to reproduce a similar failure using a
SetConsoleScreenBufferInfoExcall, and I've confirmed that this PRhas fixed that.
I've also added another screen buffer test to make sure the
ResizeWithReflowmethod doesn't shrink the virtual bottom whenresizing at the top of the buffer.