Skip to content

Conversation

@dsgrieve
Copy link
Contributor

Motivation and Context

Bug #2183

Description

DefaultSKContext.Builder should not set a default for SemanticTextMemory.

Contribution Checklist

@dsgrieve dsgrieve requested a review from a team as a code owner August 28, 2023 18:21
@dsgrieve dsgrieve added the java Issue or PR regarding Java code label Aug 28, 2023
@dsgrieve dsgrieve linked an issue Aug 28, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
@dsgrieve dsgrieve linked an issue Aug 28, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
@dsgrieve dsgrieve merged commit 74b18b9 into experimental-java Aug 29, 2023
@dsgrieve dsgrieve deleted the 2183-java-skcontext-builder-brings-a-default-memory-instead-of-kernels branch August 29, 2023 15:04
johnoliver pushed a commit to johnoliver/semantic-kernel that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2024
…oft#2605)

### Motivation and Context

<!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo!
Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following
information:
  1. Why is this change required?
  2. What problem does it solve?
  3. What scenario does it contribute to?
  4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here.
-->

Bug microsoft#2183 

### Description

<!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design.
These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! -->

DefaultSKContext.Builder should not set a default for
SemanticTextMemory.

### Contribution Checklist

<!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: -->

- [X] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings
- [X] The PR follows the [SK Contribution
Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
and the [pre-submission formatting
script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts)
raises no violations
- [X] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible
- [X] I didn't break anyone 😄
johnoliver pushed a commit to johnoliver/semantic-kernel that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2024
…oft#2605)

### Motivation and Context

<!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo!
Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following
information:
  1. Why is this change required?
  2. What problem does it solve?
  3. What scenario does it contribute to?
  4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here.
-->

Bug microsoft#2183 

### Description

<!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design.
These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! -->

DefaultSKContext.Builder should not set a default for
SemanticTextMemory.

### Contribution Checklist

<!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: -->

- [X] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings
- [X] The PR follows the [SK Contribution
Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
and the [pre-submission formatting
script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts)
raises no violations
- [X] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible
- [X] I didn't break anyone 😄
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

java Issue or PR regarding Java code

Projects

No open projects
Status: Sprint: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Java: SKContext builder brings a default memory instead of Kernel's Java: Context created with NullMemory instead of Kernel's

3 participants