Java: Fix SQLite Memory Connector error when opening existing SK database#2517
Merged
dsgrieve merged 19 commits intomicrosoft:experimental-javafrom Aug 21, 2023
milderhc:fix-2499
Merged
Java: Fix SQLite Memory Connector error when opening existing SK database#2517dsgrieve merged 19 commits intomicrosoft:experimental-javafrom milderhc:fix-2499
dsgrieve merged 19 commits intomicrosoft:experimental-javafrom
milderhc:fix-2499
Conversation
### Motivation and Context ### Description Opening a PR with initial CI changes to build and run tests against Java packages. ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [ ] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [ ] The PR follows SK Contribution Guidelines (https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) - [ ] The code follows the .NET coding conventions (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/csharp/fundamentals/coding-style/coding-conventions) verified with `dotnet format` - [ ] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [ ] I didn't break anyone 😄 --------- Co-authored-by: joe-braley <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Luigi96 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Mark Wallace <[email protected]>
### Motivation and Context <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> ### Description <!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design. These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! --> ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [ ] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [ ] The PR follows SK Contribution Guidelines (https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) - [ ] The code follows the .NET coding conventions (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/csharp/fundamentals/coding-style/coding-conventions) verified with `dotnet format` - [ ] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [ ] I didn't break anyone 😄 Co-authored-by: Mark Wallace <[email protected]>
### Motivation and Context <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> Complete the implementation of VolatileMemoryStoreTests ### Description <!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design. These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! --> Complete the implementation of VolatileMemoryStoreTests. Make implementation consistent with tests. Please note that I added equals and hashCode methods to Embedding, MemoryRecord, and MemoryRecordMetadata because these unit tests use assertEquals. Alternatively, I could have created methods in VolatileMemoryStoreTests to check equality. I'm good with either way. ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [x] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [x] The PR follows SK Contribution Guidelines (https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) - [x] ~The code follows the .NET coding conventions (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/csharp/fundamentals/coding-style/coding-conventions) verified with `dotnet format`~ Java code follows AOSP style - [x] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [x] I didn't break anyone 😄 --------- Co-authored-by: Mark Wallace <[email protected]>
### Motivation and Context ### Description Add command to PRs to properly format Java code. ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [ ] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [ ] The PR follows SK Contribution Guidelines (https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) - [ ] The code follows the .NET coding conventions (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/csharp/fundamentals/coding-style/coding-conventions) verified with `dotnet format` - [ ] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [ ] I didn't break anyone 😄 --------- Co-authored-by: Mark Wallace <[email protected]>
dsgrieve
reviewed
Aug 21, 2023
Contributor
dsgrieve
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is there a way to provide a unit test for this?
Contributor
Author
|
I will add a test in the refactor for memory connectors, using a single database for all tests. |
dsgrieve
approved these changes
Aug 21, 2023
johnoliver
added a commit
to johnoliver/semantic-kernel
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 5, 2024
…base (microsoft#2517) ### Motivation and Context <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> Quick fix for microsoft#2499 ### Description <!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design. These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! --> Adding `IF NOT EXISTS` to the index creation. ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [ ] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [ ] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [ ] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [ ] I didn't break anyone 😄 --------- Co-authored-by: Luigi Montoya <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: joe-braley <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Luigi96 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Mark Wallace <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: John Oliver <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: David Grieve <[email protected]>
johnoliver
added a commit
to johnoliver/semantic-kernel
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 5, 2024
…base (microsoft#2517) ### Motivation and Context <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> Quick fix for microsoft#2499 ### Description <!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design. These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! --> Adding `IF NOT EXISTS` to the index creation. ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [ ] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [ ] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [ ] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [ ] I didn't break anyone 😄 --------- Co-authored-by: Luigi Montoya <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: joe-braley <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Luigi96 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Mark Wallace <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: John Oliver <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: David Grieve <[email protected]>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation and Context
Quick fix for #2499
Description
Adding
IF NOT EXISTSto the index creation.Contribution Checklist