Skip to content

Conversation

@chilo-ms
Copy link
Contributor

@chilo-ms chilo-ms requested a review from jywu-msft November 18, 2024 21:02
@chilo-ms chilo-ms merged commit 56e4fda into main Nov 19, 2024
93 checks passed
@chilo-ms chilo-ms deleted the chi/implicit_exclude_dds_2 branch November 19, 2024 17:08
mszhanyi pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2024
…unning on TRT" (#22878)

- Revert #22681
- But still implicitly exclude DDS ops for TRT 10. Will later provide
better PR to add trt_op_types_to_exclude provider option.
guschmue pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2024
…unning on TRT" (#22878)

- Revert #22681
- But still implicitly exclude DDS ops for TRT 10. Will later provide
better PR to add trt_op_types_to_exclude provider option.
ankitm3k pushed a commit to intel/onnxruntime that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2024
…unning on TRT" (microsoft#22878)

- Revert microsoft#22681
- But still implicitly exclude DDS ops for TRT 10. Will later provide
better PR to add trt_op_types_to_exclude provider option.
ankitm3k pushed a commit to intel/onnxruntime that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2024
…unning on TRT" (microsoft#22878)

- Revert microsoft#22681
- But still implicitly exclude DDS ops for TRT 10. Will later provide
better PR to add trt_op_types_to_exclude provider option.
ankitm3k pushed a commit to intel/onnxruntime that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2024
…unning on TRT" (microsoft#22878)

- Revert microsoft#22681
- But still implicitly exclude DDS ops for TRT 10. Will later provide
better PR to add trt_op_types_to_exclude provider option.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants