[TensorRT EP] Fix bug for no nodes in subgraph at GetCapability#18449
Merged
[TensorRT EP] Fix bug for no nodes in subgraph at GetCapability#18449
Conversation
jywu-msft
reviewed
Nov 16, 2023
onnxruntime/core/providers/tensorrt/tensorrt_execution_provider.cc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
jywu-msft
approved these changes
Nov 16, 2023
kleiti
pushed a commit
to kleiti/onnxruntime
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2024
…osoft#18449) It's possible that subgraph of the "If" control flow op has no nodes. TRT EP should consider this kind of subgraph is fully supported by TRT. The faster rcnn model mentioned in this issue microsoft#17434 is the case.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It's possible that subgraph of the "If" control flow op has no nodes.
TRT EP should consider this kind of subgraph is fully supported by TRT.
The faster rcnn model mentioned in this issue #17434 is the case.