Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2734 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 51.62% 51.62% -0.01%
+ Complexity 4088 4082 -6
============================================
Files 149 149
Lines 34243 34242 -1
Branches 5719 5719
============================================
- Hits 17679 17677 -2
+ Misses 14103 14091 -12
- Partials 2461 2474 +13 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
| public void testBulkCopyDateTimePrecision() throws SQLException { | ||
| String dstTable = TestUtils | ||
| .escapeSingleQuotes(AbstractSQLGenerator.escapeIdentifier(RandomUtil.getIdentifier("dstTable"))); | ||
| .escapeSingleQuotes(AbstractSQLGenerator.escapeIdentifier(RandomUtil.getIdentifier("dstTableBulkCopyDt"))); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
None of the previous code here was leaving objects in the DB, but the generic name "dstTable" was used elsewhere, making it difficult to quickly identify the offending test.
| TestUtils.dropTableIfExists(manyParamsTable, stmt); | ||
| TestUtils.dropTableIfExists(tableNameJSON, stmt); | ||
| TestUtils.dropProcedureIfExists(procedureNameJSON, stmt); | ||
| TestUtils.dropUserDefinedTypeIfExists(manyParamUserDefinedType, stmt); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tens of thousands of stray types were not getting cleaned up due to this ordering. The type was referenced by the sproc, so the type wouldn't get dropped.
| TestUtils.dropTypeIfExists(timestampTVP, stmt); | ||
| TestUtils.dropTypeIfExists(dateTVP, stmt); | ||
| TestUtils.dropTypeIfExists(timeTVP, stmt); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tens of thousands of stray types were not getting cleaned up here...
3 participants
During review of #2705, I noticed a lot of old test objects in the logs. This PR updates a few tests that weren't cleaning up after themselves appropriately.