Send client process ID to server on Java 9+#1595
Merged
lilgreenbird merged 2 commits intomicrosoft:devfrom Jun 11, 2021
Merged
Conversation
David-Engel
changed the title
lilgreenbird
approved these changes
Jun 4, 2021
lilgreenbird
reviewed
Jun 4, 2021
lilgreenbird
approved these changes
Jun 4, 2021
Contributor
|
/azp run Microsoft.mssql-jdbc.macOS |
|
No pipelines are associated with this pull request. |
Contributor
|
/azp run Microsoft.mssql-jdbc.macOS |
|
No pipelines are associated with this pull request. |
karinazhou
reviewed
Jun 9, 2021
karinazhou
approved these changes
Jun 10, 2021
VeryVerySpicy
approved these changes
Jun 10, 2021
Member
|
Just curious.. should this call be wrapped under JDBC 43 support check? |
Closed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Since we can easily do it in Java 9 and up, we should. If catching NoClassDefFoundError is objectionable, I'm open to other suggestions.
You can validate the behavior by querying
sys.dm_exec_sessionswhen a connection is active:select * from sys.dm_exec_sessions