Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
@microsoft-github-policy-service agree |
4b5d6ed to
4c1dd64
Compare
4c1dd64 to
011b69b
Compare
011b69b to
ca96114
Compare
hediet
approved these changes
Oct 15, 2025
Tyriar
approved these changes
Oct 15, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There were a couple of problems in Kotlins number literal parsing.
This PR adapts it to conform to the grammar described in the Language Spec chapter 1.2.3 Literals.
Unsigned suffixes
In Kotlin 1.5 unsigned numbers were introduced, including the suffixes
uandUfor number literals and while the following examples are valid Kotlin now they weren't correctly highlighted:Leading dot floating point literals
In Kotlin number literals can start with a leading dot.
Long suffix must be uppercase
Unlike Java only the uppercase
Lis a valid suffix.Double suffix doesn't exist
Unlike Java there isn't a suffix to indicate that a number is a double.