Component
Documentation
Bug Description
docs/architecture/agentic-workflows.md describes the Security Reviewer as orchestrating "OWASP-based vulnerability assessment", but this is no longer accurate after #1223, which added the secure-by-design skill based on UK Government Secure by Design Principles and Australian ASD/ACSC Secure by Design Foundations — neither of which is an OWASP framework.
What the documentation currently says (line ~172):
The Security Reviewer orchestrates OWASP-based vulnerability assessment through four subagents: Codebase Profiler, Skill Assessor, Finding Deep Verifier, and Report Generator. It supports audit, diff, and plan modes.
What the implementation now does (after #1223):
- The Security Reviewer now supports a
secure-by-design skill alongside the existing OWASP skills (owasp-top-10, owasp-llm, owasp-agentic, owasp-mcp, owasp-infrastructure)
- The agent's own
description field reads: "Security skill assessment orchestrator for codebase profiling and vulnerability reporting" — not OWASP-specific
- A new entry-point prompt
security-review-sbd.prompt.md was added specifically for Secure by Design assessments
- The
secure-by-design skill was registered in both the security and hve-core-all collections as experimental
The "OWASP-based" qualifier in the docs is factually inaccurate for anyone using the new secure-by-design skill or the security-review-sbd prompt.
Expected Behavior
docs/architecture/agentic-workflows.md should be updated to:
- Replace "OWASP-based" with a broader description that covers multiple security frameworks (e.g., "multi-framework security skill assessment" or "security vulnerability assessment")
- Optionally note that supported skills include OWASP frameworks and Secure by Design frameworks
Suggested replacement sentence:
The Security Reviewer orchestrates security skill assessment through four subagents: Codebase Profiler, Skill Assessor, Finding Deep Verifier, and Report Generator. It supports audit, diff, and plan modes across OWASP and Secure by Design frameworks.
Steps to Reproduce
- View the merged PR: #1223
- Read
.github/agents/security/security-reviewer.agent.md (Inputs section, skill resolution section listing secure-by-design)
- Compare against
docs/architecture/agentic-workflows.md line ~172 (Security Review section)
Additional Context
Documentation file: docs/architecture/agentic-workflows.md
- Line ~172: Security Review section description
Code files changed in #1223:
.github/agents/security/security-reviewer.agent.md — updated to reference secure-by-design as a supported skill
.github/skills/security/secure-by-design/SKILL.md — new skill added
.github/prompts/security/security-review-sbd.prompt.md — new SBD-specific prompt added
collections/security.collection.yml — secure-by-design skill registered as experimental
Generated by Documentation Update Check · ◷
Generated by Documentation Update Check · ◷
Component
Documentation
Bug Description
docs/architecture/agentic-workflows.mddescribes the Security Reviewer as orchestrating "OWASP-based vulnerability assessment", but this is no longer accurate after #1223, which added thesecure-by-designskill based on UK Government Secure by Design Principles and Australian ASD/ACSC Secure by Design Foundations — neither of which is an OWASP framework.What the documentation currently says (line ~172):
What the implementation now does (after #1223):
secure-by-designskill alongside the existing OWASP skills (owasp-top-10,owasp-llm,owasp-agentic,owasp-mcp,owasp-infrastructure)descriptionfield reads: "Security skill assessment orchestrator for codebase profiling and vulnerability reporting" — not OWASP-specificsecurity-review-sbd.prompt.mdwas added specifically for Secure by Design assessmentssecure-by-designskill was registered in both thesecurityandhve-core-allcollections asexperimentalThe "OWASP-based" qualifier in the docs is factually inaccurate for anyone using the new
secure-by-designskill or thesecurity-review-sbdprompt.Expected Behavior
docs/architecture/agentic-workflows.mdshould be updated to:Suggested replacement sentence:
Steps to Reproduce
.github/agents/security/security-reviewer.agent.md(Inputs section, skill resolution section listingsecure-by-design)docs/architecture/agentic-workflows.mdline ~172 (Security Review section)Additional Context
Documentation file:
docs/architecture/agentic-workflows.mdCode files changed in #1223:
.github/agents/security/security-reviewer.agent.md— updated to referencesecure-by-designas a supported skill.github/skills/security/secure-by-design/SKILL.md— new skill added.github/prompts/security/security-review-sbd.prompt.md— new SBD-specific prompt addedcollections/security.collection.yml—secure-by-designskill registered asexperimental