Library
React Components / v9 (@fluentui/react-components)
System Info
System:
OS: Linux 5.15 Ubuntu 20.04 LTS (Focal Fossa)
CPU: (20) x64 Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-10900K CPU @ 3.70GHz
Memory: 51.01 GB / 62.66 GB
Container: Yes
Shell: 5.8 - /usr/bin/zsh
Browsers:
Chrome: 113.0.5672.126
Firefox: 104.0
Are you reporting Accessibility issue?
no
Reproduction
Cloning the repo and running yarn buildci gives a bunch of api changes.
Bug Description
Actual Behavior
Getting many api changes:

After talking to @TristanWatanabe, he mentioned this is due to a recent PR #27936 that bumps api-extractor. This bump included this change:

therefore our current way of dealing with path aliases is not working correctly:

From this, we get a removal of the following due to the api extractor not giving the same output as ci (also the local output is wrong)

Expected Behavior
CI and local api extractor should provide the same output.
Logs
No response
Requested priority
High
Products/sites affected
No response
Are you willing to submit a PR to fix?
yes
Validations
Library
React Components / v9 (@fluentui/react-components)
System Info
System: OS: Linux 5.15 Ubuntu 20.04 LTS (Focal Fossa) CPU: (20) x64 Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-10900K CPU @ 3.70GHz Memory: 51.01 GB / 62.66 GB Container: Yes Shell: 5.8 - /usr/bin/zsh Browsers: Chrome: 113.0.5672.126 Firefox: 104.0Are you reporting Accessibility issue?
no
Reproduction
Cloning the repo and running yarn buildci gives a bunch of api changes.
Bug Description
Actual Behavior
Getting many api changes:

After talking to @TristanWatanabe, he mentioned this is due to a recent PR #27936 that bumps api-extractor. This bump included this change:
therefore our current way of dealing with path aliases is not working correctly:
From this, we get a removal of the following due to the api extractor not giving the same output as ci (also the local output is wrong)
Expected Behavior
CI and local api extractor should provide the same output.
Logs
No response
Requested priority
High
Products/sites affected
No response
Are you willing to submit a PR to fix?
yes
Validations