Do not mark indexed access object type comparisons as unreliable.#54781
Do not mark indexed access object type comparisons as unreliable.#54781DanielRosenwasser merged 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
|
@typescript-bot pack this |
|
Heya @DanielRosenwasser, I've started to run the diff-based user code test suite on this PR at 8d94382. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
|
Heya @DanielRosenwasser, I've started to run the parallelized Definitely Typed test suite on this PR at 8d94382. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
|
Heya @DanielRosenwasser, I've started to run the extended test suite on this PR at 8d94382. You can monitor the build here. |
|
Heya @DanielRosenwasser, I've started to run the perf test suite on this PR at 8d94382. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
|
Heya @DanielRosenwasser, I've started to run the tarball bundle task on this PR at 8d94382. You can monitor the build here. |
|
Heya @DanielRosenwasser, I've started to run the diff-based top-repos suite (tsserver) on this PR at 8d94382. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
|
Heya @DanielRosenwasser, I've started to run the diff-based top-repos suite on this PR at 8d94382. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
|
Heya @DanielRosenwasser, I've started to run the diff-based user code test suite (tsserver) on this PR at 8d94382. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
|
Hey @DanielRosenwasser, I've packed this into an installable tgz. You can install it for testing by referencing it in your and then running There is also a playground for this build and an npm module you can use via |
|
@JoshuaKGoldberg Any chance you could throw the above package ( |
|
@DanielRosenwasser Here are the results of running the user test suite comparing There were infrastructure failures potentially unrelated to your change:
Otherwise... Something interesting changed - please have a look. Details
|
|
@DanielRosenwasser Here are the results of running the user test suite comparing There were infrastructure failures potentially unrelated to your change:
Otherwise... Everything looks good! |
|
@DanielRosenwasser Here they are:
CompilerComparison Report - main..54781
System
Hosts
Scenarios
TSServerComparison Report - main..54781
System
Hosts
Scenarios
StartupComparison Report - main..54781
System
Hosts
Scenarios
Developer Information: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
@typescript-bot cherry-pick this to release-5.1 |
|
Heya @DanielRosenwasser, I've started to run the task to cherry-pick this into |
|
Hey @DanielRosenwasser, I've opened #54786 for you. |
Component commits: 8d94382 Do not mark indexed access object type comparisons as unreliable.
|
Hey @DanielRosenwasser, the results of running the DT tests are ready. |
|
@DanielRosenwasser Here are the results of running the top-repos suite comparing Everything looks good! |
weswigham
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Definitely will need to revert this revert eventually, but we absolutely need to make some things more efficient first to compensate.
Can we add a non-strict @types/lodash usage to the extended test suite (as that's what this fixes), since the DT run won't cover it? It's just a new folder in https://github.com/microsoft/typescript-error-deltas/tree/main/userTests right?
I believe so, @jakebailey can help you there. |
|
@DanielRosenwasser Here are the results of running the top-repos suite comparing Everything looks good! |
Reverts the checker change in #52106.
Fixes #54542.
See #54754 for a hopefully better long-term fix.
Reopens #52096.