Describe the bug
Vectorized minmax family functions return wrong index / value when input contains NaNs.
Generally when input contains NaN, the behavior is undefined, because f strict weak ordering violation.
However, if the input contains only NaN value elements or NaN value elements and only one non-NaN value elements, the behavior appears to be defined: the comparisons is all false, so the strict weak ordering is met.
The below modification of test case fails though.
Command-line test case
From 50a4983bc81ceb867012cbff98081b0ba505c560 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Guteniev <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 09:25:19 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] repro
---
.../VSO_0000000_vector_algorithms/test.cpp | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/std/tests/VSO_0000000_vector_algorithms/test.cpp b/tests/std/tests/VSO_0000000_vector_algorithms/test.cpp
index 5f817218..cbd6f195 100644
--- a/tests/std/tests/VSO_0000000_vector_algorithms/test.cpp
+++ b/tests/std/tests/VSO_0000000_vector_algorithms/test.cpp
@@ -416,6 +416,22 @@ void test_min_max_element_floating(mt19937_64& gen) {
}
}
+template <class T>
+void test_min_max_element_floating_nan(mt19937_64& gen) {
+ // The set of two elements doesn't violate strict weak ordering
+ vector<T> input_of_input{numeric_limits<T>::quiet_NaN(), static_cast<T>(1.61803)};
+
+ uniform_int_distribution<size_t> idx_dis(0, input_of_input.size() - 1);
+
+ vector<T> input;
+ input.reserve(dataCount);
+ test_case_min_max_element(input);
+ for (size_t attempts = 0; attempts < dataCount; ++attempts) {
+ input.push_back(input_of_input[idx_dis(gen)]);
+ test_case_min_max_element(input);
+ }
+}
+
void test_min_max_element_pointers(mt19937_64& gen) {
const short arr[20]{};
@@ -905,6 +921,10 @@ void test_vector_algorithms(mt19937_64& gen) {
test_min_max_element_floating<double>(gen);
test_min_max_element_floating<long double>(gen);
+ test_min_max_element_floating_nan<float>(gen);
+ test_min_max_element_floating_nan<double>(gen);
+ test_min_max_element_floating_nan<long double>(gen);
+
test_min_max_element_pointers(gen);
test_min_max_element_special_cases<int8_t, 16>(); // SSE2 vectors
--
2.44.0.windows.1
Expected behavior
The above test pass. The algorithm returns the result as per standard.
UB cases still may fail, any expectation are only about apparently valid cases.
STL version
18c09c4
Additional context
Originally reported in #3928 (comment)
Describe the bug
Vectorized minmax family functions return wrong index / value when input contains NaNs.
Generally when input contains NaN, the behavior is undefined, because f strict weak ordering violation.
However, if the input contains only NaN value elements or NaN value elements and only one non-NaN value elements, the behavior appears to be defined: the comparisons is all false, so the strict weak ordering is met.
The below modification of test case fails though.
Command-line test case
Expected behavior
The above test pass. The algorithm returns the result as per standard.
UB cases still may fail, any expectation are only about apparently valid cases.
STL version
18c09c4
Additional context
Originally reported in #3928 (comment)