feat: remove TSLint#866
Conversation
|
Also todo:
|
|
There's one reference left to tslint in packages/dtslint/README.md. |
|
CI still fails from knip, but we're close. |
sandersn
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
looks good, although it also needs a matching DT PR to remove tslint.jsons there, and a pnpm changeset entry.
|
I have no idea how this didn't fail the changeset test. |
Right, the existing core TSLint rule disables... blurgh. Will work on that now. |
|
|
|
Wait a minute, dt.json and dtslint.json are empty now. At least the ones in packages/dtslint are. |
|
I deleted tslint.jsons on DT just now: DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped#67890 I'm going to heat my office by testing locally while I go make breakfast. |
|
@JoshuaKGoldberg are you talking about the rules that we deleted without moving to eslint? We triaged the rules into good, bad, decent-but-too-much--effort and only kept the good ones. |
|
Yeah, once my one comment is fixed, I think this PR is good, so I'm not sure why it's drafted. |
|
OH! I did a silly and mixed up Never mind, apologies for the disruption .🙂 |
| "@definitelytyped/header-parser": minor | ||
| "@definitelytyped/dtslint": minor |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I failed to notice that these said minor. They should have been patch. We are 0.0.x without stability and now we just released partial 0.1.0s :(((((((((((((((
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh geez. sorry!
Fixes #648! 🥳🔪
Now that all the old TSLint rules have been switch to ESLint equivalents, there's no more need for TSLint in
dtslint. This PR removes thetslintpackage reference and tooling around it.Edit: Actually, one more set of steps. See #866 (comment).