Conversation
Set expectations for meaningful AI use in contributions: - Contributors must understand and be able to explain their work - AI should support learning, not replace critical thinking - Low-effort AI-generated submissions are not acceptable
colinfrisch
left a comment
colinfrisch
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think it's a good message to send !
|
Thanks for the reviews. I will give others a bit of time to comment/review, and with no objections will merge tomorrow. |
jackiekazil
left a comment
jackiekazil
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I love this change. Besides my one comment - I wonder whether the CoC is the right place OR if this should go into Contributing.md?
I ask, because -- are we going to use the enforcement standards / process towards AI/LLM use? (I want to make sure that isn't conflated and we intend to use that way.)
|
|
||
| ### AI and LLM Use | ||
|
|
||
| AI tools can be valuable for learning, exploring ideas, and accelerating work. We welcome their thoughtful use. To ensure contributions remain meaningful and contributors continue to grow, we ask that you: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would make one change -- add something explicit about how the AI/LLM is being use --
- Is the AI being used to write code?
- Is the AI being used to write the PR?
It doesn't need to be an exhaustive list - it is just unclear how the AI is being applied.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for your input. I don’t think you can list what’s “right” and “wrong” use of AI, It depends too much on the situation, skill and complexity.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
At TU Delft, we ask students to add a short section on AI use to e.g. a thesis. Here they must indicate how generative AI was used. This might offer a middle ground and is something we can add to the PR template.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Something worth considering I think. The level of detail might be hard to get right.
|
For now I’m merging this. We can always update this and/or the templates in future PRs. |
6 participants
Set expectations for meaningful AI use in contributions: