Conversation
Fixes mesa#2846 by changing the academic article reference link in the "Epstein Civil Violence" example to its corresponding doi equivalent.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Problem described by #2846. The broken link may lead to confusion from potential users of Mesa and adds unnecessary hurdles to further learning by interested readers.
Fixes #2846 by changing the academic article reference link in the "Epstein Civil Violence" example to its corresponding doi equivalent.
Bug / Issue
Reading through the "Epstein Civil Violence" example in the Mesa documentation, users are referred to the original academic article under "Further Reading" (link). On clicking, however, the user is brought to "404 Page Not Found" on the PNAS website.
Implementation
Changed link in the
Readme.mdof the "Epstein Civil Violence" example to the correct and stable doi link (specifically https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.092080199).Testing
Performed very much on-the-fly, so docs were not rebuilt locally. Given that only one line was changed and that the new link in the raw code can be quickly manually checked, this was considered fine.
Additional Notes
N/A