Move examples from mesa repo to mesa-examples repo. #1529
Conversation
0ed0301 to
2a8efed
Compare
36291ad to
867ada4
Compare
Codecov ReportBase: 91.28% // Head: 81.44% // Decreases project coverage by
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1529 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 91.28% 81.44% -9.84%
==========================================
Files 15 16 +1
Lines 1308 1326 +18
Branches 229 230 +1
==========================================
- Hits 1194 1080 -114
- Misses 80 203 +123
- Partials 34 43 +9
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report at Codecov. |
|
Note: Tests -- there are some tests that I labeled as "skip". I think we need to have a further conversation about the tests and the examples repo, but I personally don't want that to hold the first iteration of the move to be held up by this. |
| return "".join(x.capitalize() for x in name.replace("-", "_").split("_")) | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| @unittest.skip( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This test is dependent on examples folder being here, so we are skipping until we discuss testing strategy.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We could move the tests to mesa-examples.
| def tearDown(self): | ||
| sys.path[:] = self.old_sys_path | ||
|
|
||
| @unittest.skip( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This test is dependent on examples folder being here, so we are skipping until we discuss testing strategy.
|
mesa/mesa-examples#10 has been merged, so I'm merging now. |
|
I deleted the temp working branch as well. |
|
It’s a shame all git history was lost in this move. That wasn’t necessary at all. There are way more elegant ways to approach this using git. |
No description provided.