Skip to content

Fix CI #1118

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
brunoocasali merged 1 commit into from
Jun 20, 2025
Merged

Fix CI #1118

brunoocasali merged 1 commit into from
Jun 20, 2025

Conversation

@brunoocasali
Copy link
Member

@brunoocasali brunoocasali commented Jun 19, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Fix CI, by ignoring if we have more than one key created, we are just asserting the quantity

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 19, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

The changes include the removal of the version declaration from the Docker Compose configuration file and an update to a test case to make assertions more flexible regarding the presence and naming of default keys, rather than their count or order.

Changes

Files/Groups Change Summary
docker-compose.yml Removed the version: "3.8" declaration line.
tests/client/test_client_key_meilisearch.py Modified test to assert presence of specific key names rather than exact count or order of keys returned.

Suggested labels

maintenance

Suggested reviewers

  • Strift

Poem

A tweak to Compose, the version line gone,
While tests now check for keys that belong.
No more counting, just names to see—
Admin and Search, as they should be.
With gentle paws, the rabbit cheers:
"Code that adapts will last for years!" 🐇

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b83095d and c427dc9.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • docker-compose.yml (0 hunks)
  • tests/client/test_client_key_meilisearch.py (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • docker-compose.yml
🔇 Additional comments (1)
tests/client/test_client_key_meilisearch.py (1)

9-17: Excellent improvement to test robustness!

The changes make this test much more resilient to different CI environments by:

  1. Flexible key count: Changing from == 2 to >= 2 allows for additional keys that might exist in different test environments
  2. Position-independent validation: Using set comprehension to collect key names eliminates dependency on key order
  3. Explicit name checking: Directly asserting the presence of required default keys is more meaningful than positional checks

This type of test improvement is exactly what's needed for stable CI pipelines.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@brunoocasali brunoocasali merged commit 8d165d5 into main Jun 20, 2025
11 checks passed
@brunoocasali brunoocasali deleted the fix-ci branch June 20, 2025 00:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@brunoocasali