WebGPU PR #3 — Interfaces for representing pipelines#25174
Conversation
|
@toji Another set of WebGPU docs to review! A much smaller one this time round. |
toji
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Great work, as always! Not too much feedback this time around.
files/en-us/web/api/gpucomputepipeline/getbindgrouplayout/index.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
files/en-us/web/api/gpucomputepipeline/getbindgrouplayout/index.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
files/en-us/web/api/gpurenderpipeline/getbindgrouplayout/index.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
files/en-us/web/api/gpurenderpipeline/getbindgrouplayout/index.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
@toji OK, fixes made. Thanks for the comments! |
toji
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Great! Updated PR LGTM overall. Can't approve because it's a draft.
Thanks! I'll keep a note in the main PR about which ones you've reviewed and given the thumbs up to. I'm keeping them as drafts for now just in case some random community member decides to try to merge it. I'll undraft them once the content is all done and we are ready to merge. |
1056b69 to
29b4fb5
Compare
Elchi3
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Merging as discussed in slack! 👍
Description
This PR is part of a multi-PR series that aims to document the WebGPU API. The interfaces documented in this PR are:
GPUBindGroup(done)GPUBindGroupLayout(done)GPUComputePipeline(done)GPUPipelineLayout(done)GPURenderPipeline(done)Note that the main PR for this series is #24202 — that one must be merged first, before any others! after that, and each subsequent one, is merged,
mainshould be merged into the next PR, and the documentation integrity must be checked (e.g. do all the links work) before merging.You can see full details of the additions expected in the WebGPU docs in my research document.
Motivation
Additional details
Related issues and pull requests