Conversation
wbamberg
requested review from
sideshowbarker
and removed request for
a team
|
The feature is still in use and browsers still support it. Should we not leave it in as a resource for when someone is reading old code? |
At least the syntax in https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Errors/For-each-in_loops_are_deprecated#examples doesn't work in Firefox or Chrome, so either that syntax is wrong or it is not supported in these browsers. Also, this is not deleting the documentation page for It's hard to find out exactly when support was removed, but this: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4002879/javascript-for-each-with suggests that it was a long time ago, and that it was never supported in Chrome. |
Elchi3
left a comment
Elchi3
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the follow-up, Will!
* delete for each...in error page ref: mdn/content#10793 * delete a TypeError page * Removed obsolete page: sniffing animation support ref: mdn/content#17290 * Duplicate Page Delete ref: mdn/content#17765 * Delete Glossary/DHTML ref: mdn/content#13138 * remove GlobalEventHandlers ref: mdn/content#18778 * cleanup wikihistory
3 participants
Follow up to #10460, this PR deletes the page at https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Errors/For-each-in_loops_are_deprecated , since this feature is gone.