Skip to content

Conversation

@mbland
Copy link
Owner

@mbland mbland commented Aug 28, 2017

Closes #189. This command is useful for tests and other cases where the proper installation of the framework must be verified.

Decided on 'null' instead of 'ok' since it's conceivable a user might want to define an application-specific 'ok' command.

Closes #189. This command is useful for tests and other cases where the
proper installation of the framework must be verified.

Decided on 'null' instead of 'ok' since it's conceivable a user might
want to define an application-specific 'ok' command.
@mbland mbland added this to the v1.7.0 milestone Aug 28, 2017
@mbland mbland self-assigned this Aug 28, 2017
In my excitement I forgot to make sure the test case names were
descriptive and accurate.
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 94.605% when pulling 532c301 on null into 348344d on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 94.605% when pulling 691a7de on null into 348344d on master.

@mbland mbland merged commit 4e8f5f5 into master Aug 28, 2017
@mbland mbland deleted the null branch August 28, 2017 20:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants