Skip to content

Empty base optimization for m_popper #23

@dcolascione

Description

@dcolascione

Right now, popper is a field, m_popper. We store a byte for m_popper even though the popper is usually stateless. If the popper were instead a base class, there would be no size penalty in the case that m_popper has no state.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions