Repository navigation
GH#14307: tighten seo-opportunities command guidance - #14741
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 2 minutes and 40 seconds. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
🔍 Code Quality Report�[0;35m[MONITOR]�[0m Code Review Monitoring Report SonarCloud: 0 bugs, 0 vulnerabilities, 1 code smells Tue Mar 31 08:10:17 UTC 2026: Code review monitoring started 📈 Current Quality Metrics
Generated on: Tue Mar 31 08:10:20 UTC 2026 Generated by AI DevOps Framework Code Review Monitoring |
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request streamlines the documentation for the SEO opportunities command. Key changes include updating the purpose and output descriptions, adding a default range of 90 days, improving formatting for arguments and lists, and consolidating the file output and recommendations sections for better readability. I have no feedback to provide.
…e live ref (#20754) Upstream issue anomalyco/opencode#14740 was auto-closed by stale bot on 2026-04-24 (60d inactivity, not maintainer rejection). PR #14741 remains OPEN with all 9/9 CI green after the v1.2.11 Windows-test fix. Changes: - Status block now names PR #14741 as live tracking surface explicitly - #14740 marked CLOSED-STALE 2026-04-24 with cause - PR CI line refreshed from 6/8 (Windows flake) to 9/9 pass - Added external interest signals (@ualtinok, @tspython) - Added explicit re-file decision with reasoning and reversal conditions - Timeline gains entry 6 for the stale-close event Planning-only cleanup. t1305 stays [x] in TODO.md. Ref #20753
Summary
.agents/scripts/commands/seo-opportunities.mdso the combined export/analyze flow is shorter and easier to scanTesting
bunx markdownlint-cli2 '.agents/scripts/commands/seo-opportunities.md'Runtime Testing
Closes #14307
aidevops.sh v3.5.514 plugin for OpenCode v1.3.9 with gpt-5.4 spent 8m and 72,617 tokens on this as a headless worker. Overall, 15h 15m since this issue was created.