Skip to content

Fixed Functions in class-mainwp-child-server-information.php #481

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
thanghv merged 1 commit into from
Oct 7, 2025
Merged

Fixed Functions in class-mainwp-child-server-information.php #481

thanghv merged 1 commit into from
Oct 7, 2025

Conversation

@DAnn2012
Copy link
Contributor

@DAnn2012 DAnn2012 commented Sep 25, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

All Submissions:

Changes proposed in this Pull Request:

Fixed Functions in class-mainwp-child-server-information.php

Closes # .

How to test the changes in this Pull Request:

Other information:

  • Have you added an explanation of what your changes do and why you'd like us to include them?
  • Have you written new tests for your changes, as applicable?
  • Have you successfully run tests with your changes locally?

Changelog entry

Enter a summary of all changes on this Pull Request. This will appear in the changelog if accepted.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Streamlined output handling in the server information display by removing redundant HTML escaping, producing cleaner markup with marginal efficiency gains.
    • Improved code clarity in the server information row rendering, reducing maintenance overhead and minimizing risk of future over-escaping issues.
    • No changes to visible content, layout, or functionality; users should experience identical behavior with slightly more reliable rendering under the hood.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 25, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

A single-line change in class/class-mainwp-child-server-information.php updates the render_row method’s HTML output by removing a redundant nested esc_html() call when echoing $config. No control flow, parameters, or broader logic were altered.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary of changes
Server info rendering
class/class-mainwp-child-server-information.php		 Simplified output in render_row: replaced echo esc_html( esc_html( $config ) ); with echo esc_html( $config );. No other code paths or signatures changed.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The title references the correct file but is vague about what was actually changed, merely stating that functions were “fixed” without specifying the removal of the redundant esc_html call in the render_row method.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Disabled knowledge base sources:

  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a6dc397 and 89df7b9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • class/class-mainwp-child-server-information.php (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (1)
class/class-mainwp-child-server-information.php (1)

990-992: Redundant escaping removed cleanly.

Dropping the second esc_html() keeps the value properly escaped while eliminating unnecessary work—looks good.

Tip

👮 Agentic pre-merge checks are now available in preview!

Pro plan users can now enable pre-merge checks in their settings to enforce checklists before merging PRs.

  • Built-in checks – Quickly apply ready-made checks to enforce title conventions, require pull request descriptions that follow templates, validate linked issues for compliance, and more.
  • Custom agentic checks – Define your own rules using CodeRabbit’s advanced agentic capabilities to enforce organization-specific policies and workflows. For example, you can instruct CodeRabbit’s agent to verify that API documentation is updated whenever API schema files are modified in a PR. Note: Upto 5 custom checks are currently allowed during the preview period. Pricing for this feature will be announced in a few weeks.

Please see the documentation for more information.

Example:

reviews:
  pre_merge_checks:
    custom_checks:
      - name: "Undocumented Breaking Changes"
        mode: "warning"
        instructions: |
          Pass/fail criteria: All breaking changes to public APIs, CLI flags, environment variables, configuration keys, database schemas, or HTTP/GraphQL endpoints must be documented in the "Breaking Change" section of the PR description and in CHANGELOG.md. Exclude purely internal or private changes (e.g., code not exported from package entry points or explicitly marked as internal).

Please share your feedback with us on this Discord post.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Sep 25, 2025

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

@thanghv thanghv merged commit d48ae91 into mainwp:main Oct 7, 2025
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@DAnn2012 @thanghv