Skip to content

Bump github/codeql-action from 1 to 2#8

Closed
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 3 commits intounstablefrom
dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2
Closed

Bump github/codeql-action from 1 to 2#8
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 3 commits intounstablefrom
dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2

Conversation

@dependabot
Copy link

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Apr 25, 2022

Bumps github/codeql-action from 1 to 2.

Changelog

Sourced from github/codeql-action's changelog.

2.1.8 - 08 Apr 2022

  • Update default CodeQL bundle version to 2.8.5. #1014
  • Fix error where the init action would fail due to a GitHub API request that was taking too long to complete #1025

2.1.7 - 05 Apr 2022

  • A bug where additional queries specified in the workflow file would sometimes not be respected has been fixed. #1018

2.1.6 - 30 Mar 2022

  • [v2+ only] The CodeQL Action now runs on Node.js v16. #1000
  • Update default CodeQL bundle version to 2.8.4. #990
  • Fix a bug where an invalid commit_oid was being sent to code scanning when a custom checkout path was being used. #956
Commits
  • 2c03704 Allow the version of the ML-powered pack to depend on the CLI version
  • dd6b592 Simplify ML-powered query status report definition
  • a90d8bf Merge pull request #1011 from github/henrymercer/ml-powered-queries-pr-check
  • dc0338e Use latest major version of actions/upload-artifact
  • 57096fe Add a PR check to validate that ML-powered queries are run correctly
  • b0ddf36 Merge pull request #1012 from github/henrymercer/update-actions-major-versions
  • 1ea2f2d Merge branch 'main' into henrymercer/update-actions-major-versions
  • 9dcc141 Merge pull request #1010 from github/henrymercer/stop-running-ml-powered-quer...
  • ea751a9 Update other Actions from v2 to v3
  • a2949f4 Update actions/checkout from v2 to v3
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

@dependabot dependabot bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file github_actions Pull requests that update GitHub Actions code labels Apr 25, 2022
@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jun 24, 2022

Looks like github/codeql-action is up-to-date now, so this is no longer needed.

@dependabot dependabot bot closed this Jun 24, 2022
@dependabot dependabot bot deleted the dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2 branch June 24, 2022 16:33
madolson pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2023
…is missed cases to redis-server. (redis#12322)

Observed that the sanitizer reported memory leak as clean up is not done
before the process termination in negative/following cases:

**- when we passed '--invalid' as option to redis-server.**

```
 -vm:~/mem-leak-issue/redis$ ./src/redis-server --invalid

*** FATAL CONFIG FILE ERROR (Redis 255.255.255) ***
Reading the configuration file, at line 2
>>> 'invalid'
Bad directive or wrong number of arguments

=================================================================
==865778==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks

Direct leak of 8 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x7f0985f65867 in __interceptor_malloc ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:145
    #1 0x558ec86686ec in ztrymalloc_usable_internal /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/zmalloc.c:117
    #2 0x558ec86686ec in ztrymalloc_usable /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/zmalloc.c:135
    #3 0x558ec86686ec in ztryrealloc_usable_internal /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/zmalloc.c:276
    #4 0x558ec86686ec in zrealloc /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/zmalloc.c:327
    #5 0x558ec865dd7e in sdssplitargs /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/sds.c:1172
    #6 0x558ec87a1be7 in loadServerConfigFromString /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/config.c:472
    #7 0x558ec87a13b3 in loadServerConfig /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/config.c:718
    #8 0x558ec85e6f15 in main /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/server.c:7258
    #9 0x7f09856e5d8f in __libc_start_call_main ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58

SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 8 byte(s) leaked in 1 allocation(s).

```

**- when we pass '--port' as option and missed to add port number to redis-server.**

```
vm:~/mem-leak-issue/redis$ ./src/redis-server --port

*** FATAL CONFIG FILE ERROR (Redis 255.255.255) ***
Reading the configuration file, at line 2
>>> 'port'
wrong number of arguments

=================================================================
==865846==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks

Direct leak of 8 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x7fdcdbb1f867 in __interceptor_malloc ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:145
    #1 0x557e8b04f6ec in ztrymalloc_usable_internal /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/zmalloc.c:117
    #2 0x557e8b04f6ec in ztrymalloc_usable /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/zmalloc.c:135
    #3 0x557e8b04f6ec in ztryrealloc_usable_internal /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/zmalloc.c:276
    #4 0x557e8b04f6ec in zrealloc /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/zmalloc.c:327
    #5 0x557e8b044d7e in sdssplitargs /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/sds.c:1172
    #6 0x557e8b188be7 in loadServerConfigFromString /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/config.c:472
    #7 0x557e8b1883b3 in loadServerConfig /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/config.c:718
    #8 0x557e8afcdf15 in main /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/server.c:7258
    #9 0x7fdcdb29fd8f in __libc_start_call_main ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58

Indirect leak of 10 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x7fdcdbb1fc18 in __interceptor_realloc ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:164
    #1 0x557e8b04f9aa in ztryrealloc_usable_internal /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/zmalloc.c:287
    #2 0x557e8b04f9aa in ztryrealloc_usable /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/zmalloc.c:317
    #3 0x557e8b04f9aa in zrealloc_usable /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/zmalloc.c:342
    #4 0x557e8b033f90 in _sdsMakeRoomFor /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/sds.c:271
    #5 0x557e8b033f90 in sdsMakeRoomFor /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/sds.c:295
    #6 0x557e8b033f90 in sdscatlen /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/sds.c:486
    #7 0x557e8b044e1f in sdssplitargs /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/sds.c:1165
    #8 0x557e8b188be7 in loadServerConfigFromString /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/config.c:472
    #9 0x557e8b1883b3 in loadServerConfig /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/config.c:718
    #10 0x557e8afcdf15 in main /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/server.c:7258
    #11 0x7fdcdb29fd8f in __libc_start_call_main ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58

SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 18 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s).

```

As part analysis found that the sdsfreesplitres is not called when this condition checks are being hit.

Output after the fix:


```
vm:~/mem-leak-issue/redis$ ./src/redis-server --invalid

*** FATAL CONFIG FILE ERROR (Redis 255.255.255) ***
Reading the configuration file, at line 2
>>> 'invalid'
Bad directive or wrong number of arguments
vm:~/mem-leak-issue/redis$

===========================================
vm:~/mem-leak-issue/redis$ ./src/redis-server --jdhg

*** FATAL CONFIG FILE ERROR (Redis 255.255.255) ***
Reading the configuration file, at line 2
>>> 'jdhg'
Bad directive or wrong number of arguments

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
vm:~/mem-leak-issue/redis$ ./src/redis-server --port

*** FATAL CONFIG FILE ERROR (Redis 255.255.255) ***
Reading the configuration file, at line 2
>>> 'port'
wrong number of arguments
```

Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file github_actions Pull requests that update GitHub Actions code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant