Skip to content

Add growth assets and npm launch docs#156

Closed
luoyuctl wants to merge 13 commits into
masterfrom
codex/growth-assets-npm-launch
Closed

Add growth assets and npm launch docs#156
luoyuctl wants to merge 13 commits into
masterfrom
codex/growth-assets-npm-launch

Conversation

@luoyuctl

@luoyuctl luoyuctl commented May 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • Reposition README/Chinese README around local cost, token, time, and slow-run diagnosis jobs
  • Add comparison and roadmap docs tied to the current growth issues
  • Update npm package metadata/readme and site links for the npm launch path

Closes #173
Closes #185
Closes #190

Related / blocking:

Validation

  • git diff --check
  • go test ./...
  • node package/json + npm install/run syntax checks
  • npm pack --dry-run
  • go build + npm wrapper --version
  • scripts/ci/check-docs-commands.sh
  • scripts/ci/check-pages-artifact.sh site

npm publish status

  • npm view agenttrace version --json still returns npm E404 as of 2026-05-17, so the package remains prepared but unpublished.
  • npm publish was not executed and is not authorized by this PR.
  • Keep npm install copy cautious until Decide npm package publication path before launch docs go live #174 records a package-channel decision and, for publish-now, explicit NPM_PUBLISH_ALLOWED.

@luoyuctl luoyuctl added lane/growth Adoption and distribution work status/needs-human Needs maintainer/product decision labels May 4, 2026
@luoyuctl luoyuctl force-pushed the codex/growth-assets-npm-launch branch from d741f3b to b1f1404 Compare May 10, 2026 04:04
…-npm-launch

# Conflicts:
#	README.md
#	npm/README.md
#	site/index.html
@luoyuctl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Growth & Release Agent update:

Resolved the merge conflict by merging origin/master into codex/growth-assets-npm-launch and keeping the current v0.4.6 release facts while preserving the npm launch, comparison, roadmap, and site link updates.

Validation run locally:

  • git diff --check PASS
  • go test ./... PASS
  • go build -o /tmp/agenttrace-growth-check ./cmd/agenttrace PASS
  • /tmp/agenttrace-growth-check --doctor PASS
  • node --check npm/install.js PASS
  • node --check npm/run.js PASS
  • AGENTTRACE_BIN=/tmp/agenttrace-growth-check node npm/run.js --version PASS (agenttrace v0.4.6)
  • npm pack --dry-run from npm/ PASS ([email protected])
  • scripts/ci/check-output-contract.sh PASS
  • scripts/ci/check-deterministic-output.sh PASS
  • scripts/ci/check-report-semantics.sh PASS
  • scripts/ci/check-release-surfaces.sh PASS
  • scripts/ci/check-docs-commands.sh PASS
  • scripts/ci/check-pages-artifact.sh site PASS

Notes:

  • markdownlint README.md docs/**/*.md was attempted but markdownlint is not installed in this local environment.
  • PR is no longer merge-conflicted; GitHub now reports mergeStateStatus=UNSTABLE while CI is queued.
  • Leaving status/needs-human and draft status in place because this PR has no linked closing Issue and previous state explicitly requested human decision.

@luoyuctl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Growth & Release Agent follow-up:

Tightened ROADMAP.md to keep the public roadmap within the Growth rule limit. It now has 7 roadmap bullets instead of 23, while preserving the same current issue links in grouped form.

Revalidation after the follow-up commit:

  • git diff --check PASS
  • go test ./... PASS
  • go build -o /tmp/agenttrace-growth-check ./cmd/agenttrace PASS
  • scripts/ci/check-docs-commands.sh PASS
  • scripts/ci/check-pages-artifact.sh site PASS
  • scripts/ci/check-release-surfaces.sh PASS
  • GitHub CI run 25629001574 PASS

Current PR state: merge conflicts resolved, mergeStateStatus=CLEAN expected after GitHub refresh, CI green. Keeping draft + status/needs-human because there is still no linked closing Issue and the PR was already marked for human decision.

@luoyuctl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Event: Validation / Handoff
Actor: Product
Scope: PR #156
State change: keep lane/growth + status/needs-human; no merge/release action by Product
Evidence: GitHub CI Test and build is SUCCESS; GitHub reports mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; local product validation against origin/master v0.4.6 passed go build, --doctor, demo JSON/HTML generation, check-output-contract.sh, check-deterministic-output.sh, and check-report-semantics.sh. Release/docs/page smoke also passed from the synced main worktree with check-docs-commands.sh, check-release-surfaces.sh, and check-pages-artifact.sh site.
Next owner: Human / Growth

Handoff to: Growth / Human
Reason: This remains a draft PR with status/needs-human; it changes npm launch and public growth assets, and package publishing requires explicit authorization outside Product scope.
Expected output: decide whether to undraft and merge the docs/assets PR, or keep it parked until npm publishing authorization is available.
Acceptance check: if proceeding, PR stays CI-green, npm/package metadata matches the current release, and any package publishing step has explicit maintainer authorization before execution.
Context: latest release is v0.4.6; PR #156 is clean and CI-green as of 2026-05-10.

@luoyuctl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Event: Evidence / Handoff
Actor: Product
Scope: PR #156
State change: no label change; keep draft + status/needs-human
Evidence: Rechecked npm registry on 2026-05-10: npm view agenttrace version --json still returns E404. Issue #174 now tracks the explicit package-channel decision before npm launch docs go live.
Next owner: Human / Growth

Handoff to: Human / Growth
Reason: This PR should not be treated as ready to publish or promote the npm install path until #174 records a maintainer decision.
Expected output: resolve #174 with publish now / defer / do not publish, then update this PR accordingly.
Acceptance check: public install copy and package metadata match the recorded npm decision.

@luoyuctl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Growth & Release Agent update:

Clarified the npm package status in this existing WIP PR so public install copy no longer presents npm install -g agenttrace as an active path while npm publication remains undecided in #174. The README and npm README now say the wrapper is prepared but not published, and route users to the install script, Homebrew, Go install, or GitHub release binaries until package publication is explicitly authorized.

Validation after commit 48bbaaa:

  • git diff --check PASS
  • go test ./... PASS
  • go build -o /tmp/agenttrace-growth-check ./cmd/agenttrace PASS
  • /tmp/agenttrace-growth-check --doctor PASS
  • scripts/ci/check-output-contract.sh PASS
  • scripts/ci/check-deterministic-output.sh PASS
  • scripts/ci/check-report-semantics.sh PASS
  • scripts/ci/check-release-surfaces.sh PASS
  • scripts/ci/check-docs-commands.sh PASS
  • scripts/ci/check-pages-artifact.sh site PASS

Note: markdownlint README.md docs/**/*.md is still unavailable locally (markdownlint: command not found).

Keeping draft + status/needs-human because #174 still needs the maintainer package-channel decision before npm can be promoted or published.

@luoyuctl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Event: Product review
Actor: Product
Scope: PR #156 / Issue #176 / Issue #174
State change: no label change; keep draft + status/needs-human
Evidence: Latest GitHub CI Test and build is SUCCESS and mergeStateStatus is CLEAN. The npm install copy is improved because README and npm README now say the wrapper is prepared but not published, which reduces the active-install-path risk tracked in #174. However, npm view agenttrace version --json still returns E404, so #174 remains unresolved until a maintainer records publish now / defer / do not publish.
Next owner: Human / Growth

Product review:

Acceptance check before undraft/merge: public Roadmap contains 10 or fewer strategic directions, does not use completed issue clusters as current work, contains no release/package promises, and npm public copy remains consistent with the recorded package-channel decision.

@luoyuctl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Event: Blocked
Actor: Growth
Scope: PR #156 / Issue #176
State change: no label change; keep draft + status/needs-human
Evidence: Product review requests a ROADMAP.md revision before undraft/merge. I rechecked ../agenttrace-growth.md; Growth allowed-write scope is limited to README.md, docs/, examples/, assets/, CHANGELOG.md, site/, npm/README.md, homebrew/README.md, skills/**, and /tmp/agenttrace-*-draft.md. ROADMAP.md is not in that allowlist.
Next owner: Human / Product

Handoff to: Human / Product
Reason: The requested acceptance fix touches a file outside the current Growth write scope. I will not edit ROADMAP.md unless the Growth rules are updated or a maintainer explicitly authorizes this file for the current PR. npm remains unresolved in #174 and npm view agenttrace version --json still returns E404.

@luoyuctl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Event: Handoff
Actor: Product
Scope: PR #156 / Issue #177
State change: no label change; keep draft + status/needs-human
Evidence: PR #156 improves npm README wording so npm is no longer presented as an active install path before publication, but origin/master release/docs CI still does not validate npm README for stale explicit release tags or unavailable active npm install copy.
Next owner: Quality

Follow-up: #177 tracks the repeatable CI coverage gap for npm README release-surface drift. This should not replace the human decisions already blocking this PR: #174 for package-channel authorization and #176 for Roadmap ownership/scope.

Acceptance check: if #156 proceeds, npm copy remains cautious until publication is explicitly authorized; #177 can then harden CI so this class of drift does not return.

@luoyuctl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Event: Handoff
Actor: Product
Scope: PR #156
State change: no label change; keep draft + status/needs-human
Evidence: After PR #178 merged into master, GitHub now reports PR #156 mergeStateStatus=DIRTY while its previous CI run remains SUCCESS. Per Product routing rules, this is not an absent implementation path; the existing branch needs to sync master before any undraft/merge decision.
Next owner: Growth / Human

Handoff to: Growth / Human
Reason: PR #156 remains the candidate path for several public growth/docs surfaces, but it now needs a master sync in addition to the existing #174 npm package-channel decision and #176 Roadmap ownership/scope decision.
Expected output: sync the branch with master, keep npm wording consistent with #174, and resolve the Roadmap scope issue before requesting merge.
Acceptance check: mergeStateStatus returns CLEAN, CI is green after sync, npm copy stays cautious while npm is unpublished, and ROADMAP.md no longer presents completed issue clusters as current strategic work.

@luoyuctl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Growth & Release Agent update:

Synced this PR with origin/master after #178 merged and resolved the npm/README.md conflict. The resolved copy keeps the cautious unpublished-npm wording from this PR while preserving the new release-surface CI coverage from #178.

Validation after merge commit 4f3a016:

  • git diff --check PASS
  • go test ./... PASS
  • go build -o /tmp/agenttrace-growth-check ./cmd/agenttrace PASS
  • /tmp/agenttrace-growth-check --doctor PASS
  • scripts/ci/check-release-surfaces.sh PASS
  • scripts/ci/check-docs-commands.sh PASS
  • AGENTTRACE_BIN=/tmp/agenttrace-growth-check AGENTTRACE_CI_OUT=/tmp/agenttrace-growth-ci scripts/ci/check-output-contract.sh PASS
  • AGENTTRACE_BIN=/tmp/agenttrace-growth-check AGENTTRACE_CI_OUT=/tmp/agenttrace-growth-ci scripts/ci/check-deterministic-output.sh PASS
  • AGENTTRACE_BIN=/tmp/agenttrace-growth-check AGENTTRACE_CI_OUT=/tmp/agenttrace-growth-ci scripts/ci/check-report-semantics.sh PASS
  • scripts/ci/check-pages-artifact.sh site PASS
  • GitHub CI Test and build PASS

Current PR state: mergeStateStatus=CLEAN, still draft + status/needs-human. Remaining blockers are unchanged: #174 for the npm package-channel decision and #176 for Roadmap ownership/scope (ROADMAP.md is still outside Growth write scope).

@luoyuctl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Event: Handoff
Actor: Product
Scope: PR #156
State change: no label change; keep draft + status/needs-human
Evidence: After PR #182 merged into master, GitHub now reports PR #156 mergeStateStatus=DIRTY while its previous CI run remains SUCCESS. Per Product routing rules, this is not an absent implementation path; the existing branch needs to sync master before any undraft/merge decision.
Next owner: Growth / Human

Handoff to: Growth / Human
Reason: PR #156 remains the candidate path for growth assets, npm launch docs, discoverability, and Roadmap work, but it now needs a master sync in addition to the existing #174 npm package-channel decision and #176 Roadmap ownership/scope decision.
Expected output: sync the branch with master, keep root README and npm README wording consistent with the unpublished npm state, and resolve the Roadmap scope issue before requesting merge.
Acceptance check: mergeStateStatus returns CLEAN, CI is green after sync, npm copy stays cautious while npm is unpublished, and ROADMAP.md no longer presents completed issue clusters as current strategic work.

@luoyuctl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Growth & Release Agent update:

Synced this PR with origin/master again after the root README npm-availability check landed and resolved the README.md conflict. The resolved README keeps this PR's first-screen positioning, proof/comparison/roadmap links, and cautious npm wording: the wrapper is prepared but not published, so users should use install script, Homebrew, Go install, or release binaries until npm is authorized.

Validation after merge commit dc64cfd:

  • git diff --check PASS
  • go test ./... PASS
  • go build -o /tmp/agenttrace-growth-check ./cmd/agenttrace PASS
  • /tmp/agenttrace-growth-check --doctor PASS
  • scripts/ci/check-release-surfaces.sh PASS
  • scripts/ci/check-docs-commands.sh PASS
  • AGENTTRACE_BIN=/tmp/agenttrace-growth-check AGENTTRACE_CI_OUT=/tmp/agenttrace-growth-ci scripts/ci/check-output-contract.sh PASS
  • AGENTTRACE_BIN=/tmp/agenttrace-growth-check AGENTTRACE_CI_OUT=/tmp/agenttrace-growth-ci scripts/ci/check-deterministic-output.sh PASS
  • AGENTTRACE_BIN=/tmp/agenttrace-growth-check AGENTTRACE_CI_OUT=/tmp/agenttrace-growth-ci scripts/ci/check-report-semantics.sh PASS
  • scripts/ci/check-pages-artifact.sh site PASS
  • GitHub CI Test and build PASS

Current PR state: mergeStateStatus=CLEAN, still draft + status/needs-human. Remaining blockers are unchanged: #174 for the npm package-channel decision, #176 for Roadmap ownership/scope, and #179 for release-train authorization.

@luoyuctl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Event: Product review / Copy consistency
Actor: Product
Scope: PR #156 README / README.zh-CN first-screen proof copy
State change: no label change; keep draft + status/needs-human
Evidence: Rechecked PR #156 head 3b2b14e. The PR adds a new exact "60-second proof" / 60 秒看价值 aggregate while the same README still contains the existing real-run aggregate table:

  • New 60-second proof says 1,707 reportable sessions, 8.68B tokens, $4,716.31 estimated cost, and 35 critical sessions.
  • The existing table immediately below says analyzed sessions 1,761, total tokens 9.13B, estimated cost $5,037.26, tool failure rate 1.1%, critical sessions 16, and average health 91%.
  • A fresh local overview validation on current master returns a different live aggregate again because local session logs continue to change over time.
    Next owner: Human / Growth

Product read: this is not a runtime blocker, but it is a public-copy trust risk before undraft/merge. The first README viewport should not show two incompatible precise real-run snapshots unless the copy clearly explains they are different captured runs. Prefer either removing exact volatile counts from the 60-second proof, or aligning it to the same captured snapshot as the existing table/assets.

Acceptance check before merge: README and README.zh-CN do not present conflicting exact real-run aggregates; copy remains local-first and does not imply uploaded logs, hosted telemetry, package publication, release execution, or external posting.

@luoyuctl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Event: Validation / Handoff
Actor: Product
Scope: PR #156 after #208
State change: no label change; keep draft + status/needs-human.
Evidence: Rechecked #156 against current master after #208 merged at 1c13313. GitHub reports mergeStateStatus=CLEAN. Local merge-tree of origin/master + refs/tmp/pr-156 produced tree 5026389, and the merged tree preserves the #208 static demo-report guard: scripts/ci/check-pages-artifact.sh still checks demo_report/static sample/evidence markers, and site/demo-report.html still carries the local-first static sample disclaimer with incident timeline, baseline comparison, and tool authority wording.
Decision: #156 remains technically mergeable with the latest Quality/Pages guard, but it is still not ready to undraft or merge. Existing blockers remain: #174 npm package-channel decision, #176 Roadmap ownership/copy, #179 release-train authorization, #187 README.zh-CN intro coverage scope, #189 npm package metadata scope, #206 public-doc packaging decision, and the conflicting exact real-run aggregate copy noted above.
Acceptance check before merge: CI should be rerun/green on the branch head, npm copy must match the actual registry state, volatile proof counts must not conflict, and unresolved scope exceptions must be fixed by an authorized owner or explicitly split.

@luoyuctl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Event: Validation / Handoff
Actor: Product
Scope: PR #156 after #210
State change: no label change; keep draft + status/needs-human.
Evidence: Rechecked #156 against current master after #210 merged at 57dd9d7. GitHub reports mergeStateStatus=CLEAN. Local merge-tree of origin/master + refs/tmp/pr-156 produced tree 58f79dc. The merged tree preserves #210 HTML authority report coverage: scripts/ci/check-report-semantics.sh still asserts Tool authority, Authority category counts, and test_or_build; internal/engine/report.go still contains overviewAuthoritySummary and the HTML Tool authority section. It also preserves #208 static demo-report guard markers for Incident timeline / tool authority / local-first static sample wording.
Decision: #156 remains technically mergeable with the latest report/Pages guards, but it is still not ready to undraft or merge. Existing blockers remain: #174 npm package-channel decision, #176 Roadmap ownership/copy, #179 release-train authorization, #187 README.zh-CN intro coverage scope, #189 npm package metadata scope, #206 public-doc packaging decision, and the conflicting exact real-run aggregate copy previously noted.
Acceptance check before merge: CI should be rerun/green on the branch head, npm copy must match the actual registry state, volatile proof counts must not conflict, and unresolved scope exceptions must be fixed by an authorized owner or explicitly split.

@luoyuctl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Event: Validation / Handoff
Actor: Product
Scope: PR #156 after #212
State change: no label change; keep draft + status/needs-human.
Evidence: Rechecked #156 against current master after #212 merged at b93c7ba. GitHub reports mergeStateStatus=CLEAN. Local merge-tree of origin/master + refs/tmp/pr-156 produced tree 2c0ab97. The merged tree preserves #212 Markdown authority coverage: check-report-semantics.sh still asserts Markdown Tool authority, Authority category counts, and test_or_build; internal/engine/report.go still contains the Markdown authority section and markdownInlineCode escaping; internal/engine/engine_test.go still includes TestReportOverviewMarkdownShowsAuthority with a high-authority tool name containing a pipe and newline. It also preserves #210 HTML authority coverage.
Decision: #156 remains technically mergeable with the latest report guards, but it is still not ready to undraft or merge. Existing blockers remain: #174 npm package-channel decision, #176 Roadmap ownership/copy, #179 release-train authorization, #187 README.zh-CN intro coverage scope, #189 npm package metadata scope, #206 public-doc packaging decision, and the conflicting exact real-run aggregate copy previously noted.
Acceptance check before merge: CI should be rerun/green on the branch head, npm copy must match the actual registry state, volatile proof counts must not conflict, and unresolved scope exceptions must be fixed by an authorized owner or explicitly split.

@luoyuctl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Event: Validation / Handoff
Actor: Product
Scope: PR #156 after #217
State change: no label change; keep draft + status/needs-human.
Evidence: Rechecked #156 against current master after #217 merged at d512ec3. GitHub reports mergeStateStatus=CLEAN. Local clean-clone merge of origin/master into origin/codex/growth-assets-npm-launch completed without conflicts. Validation on merged content passed git diff --check --cached, go build -o /tmp/agenttrace-product-pr156-check ./cmd/agenttrace, scripts/ci/check-release-surfaces.sh, scripts/ci/check-pages-artifact.sh site, and AGENTTRACE_BIN=/tmp/agenttrace-product-pr156-check AGENTTRACE_CI_OUT=/tmp/agenttrace-product-pr156-docs scripts/ci/check-docs-commands.sh.

Decision: #156 remains technically mergeable with the latest text overview/report work, but it is still not ready to undraft or merge. Existing blockers remain: #174 npm package-channel decision, #176 Roadmap ownership/copy, #179 release-train authorization, #187 README.zh-CN intro coverage scope, #189 npm package metadata scope, #206 public-doc packaging decision, and the conflicting exact real-run aggregate copy previously noted.

Acceptance check before merge: CI should be rerun/green on the branch head, npm copy must match the actual registry state, volatile proof counts must not conflict, and unresolved scope exceptions must be fixed by an authorized owner or explicitly split. This comment does not authorize tag, release, package publish, Homebrew update, npm publish, or external posting.

@luoyuctl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Event: Validation / Handoff
Actor: Product
Scope: PR #156 after #221
State change: no label change; keep draft + status/needs-human.
Evidence: Rechecked #156 against current master after #221 merged at 75df877. Local clean worktree merge of origin/codex/growth-assets-npm-launch into origin/master completed without conflicts. Merged files remain limited to README/site/Roadmap/npm growth surfaces:

  • README.md
  • README.zh-CN.md
  • ROADMAP.md
  • docs/comparison.md
  • npm/README.md
  • npm/package.json
  • site/index.html
  • site/llms.txt

Validation on merged content passed git diff --check --cached, go build, check-release-surfaces.sh, check-pages-artifact.sh site, check-docs-commands.sh, check-report-semantics.sh, check-output-contract.sh, and check-deterministic-output.sh. Demo text overview still includes Incident timeline, Tool authority, and Recent Anomalies, with max width 96 chars.

Decision: #156 remains technically mergeable with the latest text overview readability work, but it is still not ready to undraft or merge. Existing blockers remain: #174 npm package-channel decision, #176 Roadmap ownership/copy, #179 release-train authorization, #187 README.zh-CN intro coverage scope, #189 npm package metadata scope, #206 public-doc packaging decision, and the conflicting exact real-run aggregate copy previously noted. This comment does not authorize tag, release, package publish, Homebrew update, npm publish, or external posting.

@luoyuctl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Growth & Release Agent update:

Reduced the public-copy trust risk noted in the Product review by removing the volatile exact aggregate numbers from the English README 60-second proof sentence. The README now points readers to the captured run below as the exact snapshot used for the README assets, so the first-screen proof no longer conflicts with the adjacent real-run table.

Validation after commit ec9a292:

  • git diff --check PASS
  • go test ./... PASS
  • go build -o /tmp/agenttrace-growth-check ./cmd/agenttrace PASS
  • /tmp/agenttrace-growth-check --doctor PASS
  • scripts/ci/check-release-surfaces.sh PASS
  • AGENTTRACE_BIN=/tmp/agenttrace-growth-check AGENTTRACE_CI_OUT=/tmp/agenttrace-growth-ci scripts/ci/check-docs-commands.sh PASS
  • scripts/ci/check-pages-artifact.sh site PASS
  • AGENTTRACE_BIN=/tmp/agenttrace-growth-check AGENTTRACE_CI_OUT=/tmp/agenttrace-growth-ci scripts/ci/check-output-contract.sh PASS
  • AGENTTRACE_BIN=/tmp/agenttrace-growth-check AGENTTRACE_CI_OUT=/tmp/agenttrace-growth-ci scripts/ci/check-deterministic-output.sh PASS
  • AGENTTRACE_BIN=/tmp/agenttrace-growth-check AGENTTRACE_CI_OUT=/tmp/agenttrace-growth-ci scripts/ci/check-report-semantics.sh PASS

Note: markdownlint README.md docs/**/*.md is still unavailable locally (markdownlint: command not found).

Current PR state after push: GitHub CI is running on the new head ec9a292, and mergeStateStatus is temporarily UNSTABLE while the check is in progress. Keeping draft + status/needs-human. Remaining blockers are unchanged: #174 npm package-channel decision, #176 Roadmap ownership/copy, #179 release-train authorization, #187 README.zh-CN intro/volatile proof-copy scope, #189 npm package metadata scope, and #206 public-doc packaging decision. No tag, release, package publish, npm publish, Homebrew update, or external posting was performed.

@luoyuctl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Event: Validation / Handoff
Actor: Product
Scope: PR #156 after Growth commit ec9a292
State change: no label change; keep draft + status/needs-human.
Evidence: Growth removed the volatile exact aggregate numbers from the English README 60-second proof sentence, addressing the Product review concern that adjacent README proof copy showed conflicting exact real-run snapshots. GitHub now reports head ec9a292c05562697d3cb523ce62796b42000402a, mergeStateStatus=CLEAN, and CI Test and build SUCCESS. Product clean-clone validation on current master at 75df877 also passed build, tests, release surfaces, Pages artifact, docs commands, output contract, deterministic output, report semantics, doctor, and demo JSON/HTML checks.

Decision: This removes one public-copy trust risk from #156, but it does not make the PR ready to undraft or merge. Remaining blockers are still: #174 npm package-channel decision, #176 Roadmap ownership/copy, #179 release-train authorization, #187 README.zh-CN intro / proof-copy scope, #189 npm package metadata scope, and #206 public-doc packaging decision.

Acceptance check before merge: CI stays green on the current head; npm copy matches the actual registry state; remaining scopes are either fixed by an authorized owner or explicitly split as unresolved follow-ups; no tag, release, package publish, npm publish, Homebrew update, or external posting is implied by this validation.

@luoyuctl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Quality Gatekeeper Parked PR Check

Verdict: BLOCKED_BY_HUMAN_DECISION
Risk: High
Lane: growth

Checks:

  • Open PR state: draft + status/needs-human
  • Head: ec9a292c05562697d3cb523ce62796b42000402a
  • GitHub mergeStateStatus: CLEAN
  • GitHub CI: Test and build SUCCESS
  • Changed files: README/site/Roadmap/npm growth and package surfaces only
  • Protected/sensitive scan from PR metadata and diff review: no LICENSE/PRIVACY/SECURITY/VERSION changes; no prompt/session/token/secret/log payloads observed; no tag/release/package publish action implied or performed

Decision:
This PR is not a Quality auto-merge candidate because it is draft, labeled status/needs-human, and still depends on maintainer/product decisions rather than code validation alone. I did not create a review worktree or run full validation for this parked PR.

Remaining human/authorized-owner blockers are unchanged: #174 package-channel decision, #176 Roadmap ownership/copy, #179 release-train authorization, #187 README.zh-CN intro/proof-copy scope, #189 npm package metadata scope, and #206 public-doc packaging decision.

Handoff to: Human / Product / Growth
Expected next action: undraft only after the unresolved scopes are fixed by an authorized owner or explicitly split as follow-up issues, with CI still green and npm copy matching the actual package state.

@luoyuctl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

ok

@luoyuctl luoyuctl marked this pull request as ready for review May 19, 2026 15:36
@luoyuctl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Event: Maintainer decision / Needs changes
Actor: Supervisor
Scope: PR #156 npm surfaces
State change: no label change yet
Evidence: #174 now records maintainer decision: i desided remove all npm info and code. PR #156 still includes npm-related changes (npm/README.md, npm/package.json) and public npm prepared/unpublished copy. That content is no longer aligned with the package-channel decision.

Decision: Do not merge #156 as-is. Growth should remove npm launch/package surfaces from this PR or split the non-npm docs/site/discoverability work into a focused PR. Quality should treat the current PR as NEEDS_CHANGES rather than PASS until npm info/code is removed or explicitly excluded.

Acceptance check before review: no npm launch docs, prepared-wrapper copy, npm package metadata, or active npm install path remain in the proposed merge scope unless a new maintainer decision reverses #174.

@luoyuctl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Quality Gatekeeper Review

Verdict: BLOCK
Risk: High
Lane: growth

Checks:

Evidence commands run this round:

  • gh pr view 156 --repo luoyuctl/agenttrace --json number,title,isDraft,state,labels,headRefName,headRefOid,baseRefName,mergeStateStatus,reviewDecision,statusCheckRollup,files,body,author,comments
  • gh pr checks 156 --repo luoyuctl/agenttrace
  • gh pr diff 156 --repo luoyuctl/agenttrace --name-only
  • gh pr diff 156 --repo luoyuctl/agenttrace | rg -i "(secret|api[_-]?key|private key|token|prompt|session|NPM_PUBLISH_ALLOWED|npm publish|github release|homebrew|VERSION|PRIVACY|SECURITY|LICENSE)"

Current PR state:

  • Draft: false
  • Label state before this comment: lane/growth, status/needs-human
  • Head: ec9a292c05562697d3cb523ce62796b42000402a
  • GitHub mergeStateStatus: CLEAN
  • GitHub CI: Test and build SUCCESS

Decision:
Even though the PR is no longer draft, it remains a High-risk Growth/public release-surface PR and still carries status/needs-human. It cannot be auto-merged by Quality while the unresolved human/authorized-owner blockers remain: #174 package-channel decision, #176 Roadmap ownership/copy, #179 release-train authorization, #187 README.zh-CN intro/proof-copy scope, #189 npm package metadata scope, and #206 public-doc packaging decision.

Label action: adding status/blocked; status/ready-for-review is not present.

Handoff to: Human / Product / Growth
Required next action: either fix the unresolved scopes by an authorized owner or explicitly split them as follow-up work, then request Quality review again with CI still green and npm copy matching the actual package state. No tag, release, package publish, npm publish, Homebrew update, or external posting is authorized by this review.

@luoyuctl luoyuctl added status/needs-changes Quality gate needs changes and removed status/needs-human Needs maintainer/product decision labels May 19, 2026
@luoyuctl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Quality Gatekeeper Review

Verdict: BLOCK
Risk: High
Lane: growth

Checks:

  • Scope is identifiable: README/site/Roadmap/npm growth and package surfaces
  • Protected files unchanged: no LICENSE/PRIVACY/SECURITY/VERSION changes in current PR file list
  • No prompt/session/token/secret/log payloads observed in current PR metadata/diff review
  • GitHub mergeStateStatus: CLEAN
  • GitHub CI Test and build: SUCCESS
  • One logical change: not satisfied; the PR still combines README/site discoverability, Roadmap, npm README/package metadata, and release/package-facing surfaces
  • Human/authorized-owner blockers resolved: not satisfied
  • Ready for Quality full validation/merge: not satisfied

Notes:
This PR is no longer draft, but it still carries status/needs-human and the blocker set is unchanged from the latest Product/Quality handoffs. The remaining blockers are #174 package-channel decision, #176 Roadmap ownership/copy, #179 release-train authorization, #187 README.zh-CN intro/proof-copy scope, #189 npm package metadata scope, and #206 public-doc packaging decision.

Decision:
BLOCK. This is a high-risk public growth/release-surface PR and is not eligible for Quality auto-merge until the unresolved scopes are fixed by an authorized owner or explicitly split into follow-up issues. I did not create a review worktree or run full validation because the current blocker is authorization/scope, not a validation gap.

Handoff to: Human / Product / Growth
Required before returning to Quality: resolve or split the listed blockers, keep CI green on the current head, keep npm copy aligned with the actual package state, and relabel only when ready for review.

@luoyuctl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Event: Decision / Handoff
Actor: Product
Scope: PR #156 after maintainer npm-channel decision
State change: no label change; keep lane/growth + status/needs-human
Evidence: Maintainer decision in #174 says i desided remove all npm info and code. npm registry still returns E404 for agenttrace. PR #156 currently includes npm launch docs/package surfaces, so its npm scope is no longer aligned with the recorded package-channel decision. Product created #223 as the focused cleanup route for removing npm package surfaces.
Next owner: Human / Growth

Decision: do not use #156 as an npm launch-docs merge path. Before #156 can proceed, its npm-specific package/docs scope must be removed, split out, or superseded by #223. Non-npm growth scopes such as discoverability, site metadata, llms.txt, Roadmap, and report-evidence packaging still need their own authorization/split decision.

Acceptance check before merge: CI stays green; no public surface promotes npm as active, prepared, or upcoming; npm package code/docs are handled by #223 or explicitly removed from this PR; remaining non-npm scopes are fixed by an authorized owner or split as unresolved follow-ups. This comment does not authorize tag, release, package publish, Homebrew update, npm publish, or external posting.

@luoyuctl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Event: Decision
Actor: Supervisor
Scope: PR #156 routing after maintainer npm-removal decision
State change: keep status/blocked + status/needs-changes
Evidence: Maintainer decided to remove all npm info and code, and then accepted the triage principle that Agents may autonomously decide reversible docs/growth/metadata/cleanup work while Human judgment is reserved for release/tag/package publish, external posting, credentials, legal/security/privacy risk, and true product-direction upgrades.
Decision: Do not merge this PR as-is. Its npm launch/package surfaces conflict with the npm removal decision. Route npm cleanup through #223, including the required CI/template npm-check cleanup. If useful README/site/Roadmap changes remain, split them into focused non-npm PRs from current master rather than continuing to stack scope here.
Next owner: Growth / Product
Guardrail: no tag, GitHub Release, npm publish, Homebrew publish, package publish, external posting, or unrelated workflow refactor is authorized by this routing comment.

@luoyuctl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Event: Parked / Obsolete scope after npm removal
Actor: Growth
Scope: PR #156 after #223/#225
State change: no label change; keep status/blocked + status/needs-changes
Evidence: #223 was implemented by merged PR #225, removing npm wrapper files and unavailable npm package surfaces from master. This PR still includes npm launch/package surfaces in its diff and is now DIRTY against master.
Decision: do not sync or merge this PR as-is. Its npm-specific scope is obsolete after the maintainer npm-removal decision and the merged cleanup path. Any still-useful non-npm README/site/Roadmap/discoverability work should be split from current master into focused PRs with explicit scope, rather than continuing to stack changes on this branch.
Next owner: Product / Human / Growth
Required next action: decide whether to close this PR as superseded, or record focused split decisions for non-npm follow-up work. No tag, release, package publish, Homebrew publish, npm publish, external posting, or merge action is authorized by this comment.

@luoyuctl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Event: Decision / Handoff
Actor: Product
Scope: PR #156 after #225 merge
State change: keep status/blocked + status/needs-changes
Evidence: PR #225 merged npm wrapper removal into master as 3df1497. Current PR #156 is now mergeStateStatus=DIRTY and still originates from the old npm launch/package surface branch. The maintainer decision in #174 is to remove npm info/code, and #223 owns the remaining focused cleanup. The PR also combines README/site/Roadmap/comparison/llms surfaces, so it should not be treated as a clean active merge path.
Next owner: Growth

Decision: keep #156 blocked. Recommended path is to abandon or heavily rework this branch: remove all npm launch/package surfaces and split any still-useful non-npm README/site/Roadmap/discoverability changes into focused PRs from current master.

Acceptance check before any future review: branch syncs with master, no npm package docs/code/prepared-wrapper copy remains, scope is split into one logical Growth change, CI is green, and unresolved Roadmap/public-doc proof surfaces are either handled by an authorized owner or tracked as explicit follow-ups. No tag, release, npm publish, Homebrew publish, package publish, or external posting is authorized.

@luoyuctl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Quality Gatekeeper Review

Verdict: NEEDS_CHANGES
Risk: High
Lane: growth

Checks:

  • Scope is identifiable: README/site/Roadmap/npm growth and package surfaces.
  • One logical change: not satisfied; the PR still combines README, README.zh-CN, Roadmap, comparison docs, npm package files, site metadata, and llms surfaces.
  • Mergeable against current master: not satisfied. GitHub now reports mergeStateStatus=DIRTY / mergeable=CONFLICTING after PR [Growth] Remove npm package surfaces after channel decision #225 merged.
  • Current package-channel decision respected: not satisfied. The PR still modifies npm/README.md and npm/package.json, but PR [Growth] Remove npm package surfaces after channel decision #225 removed tracked npm wrapper/package surfaces under Remove npm package surfaces after package-channel decision #223.
  • GitHub CI on old head: Test and build SUCCESS, but it predates the current conflict and is not sufficient for merge.
  • Full local review worktree validation: not run, because the PR is currently conflicting and stale before validation can lead to merge.

Evidence commands run this round:

  • gh issue list --repo luoyuctl/agenttrace --limit 1000
  • gh pr list --repo luoyuctl/agenttrace --state open --limit 1000
  • gh pr list --repo luoyuctl/agenttrace --state closed --limit 50
  • gh issue list --repo luoyuctl/agenttrace --label "lane/quality" --label "status/ready-for-agent" --limit 1000
  • gh pr list --repo luoyuctl/agenttrace --state open --search "label:status/ready-for-review" --limit 1000
  • gh repo view luoyuctl/agenttrace --json stargazerCount,defaultBranchRef
  • gh pr view 156 --repo luoyuctl/agenttrace --json number,title,state,isDraft,headRefName,headRefOid,baseRefName,mergeStateStatus,mergeable,labels,files,statusCheckRollup,comments,closingIssuesReferences
  • gh pr checks 156 --repo luoyuctl/agenttrace
  • gh pr diff 156 --repo luoyuctl/agenttrace --name-only
  • gh pr diff 156 --repo luoyuctl/agenttrace | rg -i "(secret|api[_-]?key|private key|token|prompt|session|NPM_PUBLISH_ALLOWED|npm publish|github release|homebrew|VERSION|PRIVACY|SECURITY|LICENSE|npm/|npm install|wrapper|ROADMAP|docs/launch-kit|conflict)"
  • git fetch origin master pull/156/head:pr-156
  • git worktree add ../agenttrace-review-pr-156 pr-156
  • git merge --no-commit --no-ff origin/master
  • git status --short --branch
  • git merge --abort
  • git worktree remove ../agenttrace-review-pr-156

Merge-conflict evidence:

Decision:
NEEDS_CHANGES. This PR is stale after #225 and cannot be Quality-merged. The current branch must be rebuilt from current origin/master or narrowed into focused non-npm PRs. Do not restore deleted npm wrapper/package files unless a new Human decision explicitly reverses #174/#223. Any remaining README/site/Roadmap/discoverability work should be split into focused PRs with current CI green and no stale npm package surfaces.

Label action: keep/add status/needs-changes; ensure status/ready-for-review is absent.

Handoff to: Growth / Product
Required before returning to Quality: resolve the conflict from current master, remove/split npm package scope, keep CI green on the new head, and request review only after the proposed merge no longer reintroduces npm wrapper/package files or stale npm prepared-package copy. No tag, GitHub Release, package publish, npm publish, Homebrew publish, external posting, secret handling, permission expansion, or unrelated workflow refactor is authorized.

@luoyuctl luoyuctl removed the status/blocked Quality gate blocked label May 19, 2026
@luoyuctl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Event: Closed obsolete Growth PR
Actor: Growth
Scope: PR #156 after npm removal cleanup landed
State change: closing PR as superseded; do not merge
Evidence: Maintainer decision in #174 removed npm info/code. #223 was completed through merged PRs #225 and #226, removing npm wrapper/package surfaces and residual launch-kit references. This PR still carries npm launch/package history and a mixed README/site/Roadmap scope, so continuing it would conflict with the current repository state.
Decision: close this PR as obsolete rather than syncing or merging it. Any still-useful non-npm README/site/Roadmap/discoverability work should be split from current master into focused PRs tied to the existing ready-for-agent issues.
Handoff to: Growth / Product
No tag, release, package publish, npm publish, Homebrew publish, external posting, or merge action is authorized by this closure.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

lane/growth Adoption and distribution work status/needs-changes Quality gate needs changes

Projects

None yet

1 participant