Skip to content

chore: update issue template#1140

Merged
looplj merged 1 commit intorelease/v0.9.xfrom
dev-tmp
Mar 23, 2026
Merged

chore: update issue template#1140
looplj merged 1 commit intorelease/v0.9.xfrom
dev-tmp

Conversation

@looplj
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@looplj looplj commented Mar 23, 2026

@looplj looplj merged commit a806977 into release/v0.9.x Mar 23, 2026
2 checks passed
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@devin-ai-integration devin-ai-integration bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✅ Devin Review: No Issues Found

Devin Review analyzed this PR and found no potential bugs to report.

View in Devin Review to see 1 additional finding.

Open in Devin Review

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request refines the bug report issue template by transforming a general 'Actual Behavior' field into a dedicated 'Error Message' field. This change aims to enhance the clarity and precision of bug reports by specifically requesting error messages, while also making the field optional to accommodate scenarios where no explicit error message is present.

Highlights

  • Issue Template Update: The bug report issue template has been updated to replace the generic 'Actual Behavior' field with a more specific 'Error Message' field.
  • Field Renaming and Guidance: The field's ID was changed from actual to error-message, and its label, description, and placeholder text were updated to guide users to paste exact error messages, including an example and render: shell for better formatting.
  • Optional Error Message: The 'Error Message' field is now optional, as the required validation was removed.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the bug report issue template by renaming the 'Actual Behavior' field to 'Error Message' and adjusting its description and placeholder to focus on error messages. The reviewer suggests that removing the 'required' validation for this field could lead to incomplete bug reports, recommending that the field remain required and its description be updated to prompt for both actual behavior and error messages.

Comment on lines 58 to +66
- type: textarea
id: actual
id: error-message
attributes:
label: Actual Behavior / 实际行为
description: What actually happened / 实际发生了什么
placeholder: Describe what actually happened... / 描述实际行为...
validations:
required: true
label: Error Message / 错误消息
description: Paste the exact error message you received (if any) / 粘贴你收到的完整错误消息(如有)
placeholder: |
e.g. / 例如:
Error: upstream provider returned 429: rate limit exceeded
render: shell
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

While adding a dedicated field for error messages is helpful, removing the requirement to describe the actual behavior might lead to incomplete bug reports. For bugs without a clear error message, users might not provide enough detail. Consider making this field required and adjusting the description to prompt for either an error message or a description of the behavior.

  - type: textarea
    id: actual-behavior
    attributes:
      label: Actual Behavior & Error Message / 实际行为和错误消息
      description: Please provide a clear and concise description of what the bug is. If you have an error message, please paste it here. / 请清晰简洁地描述 bug 是什么。如果你收到了错误消息,请在此处粘贴。
      placeholder: |
        A clear and concise description of what the bug is.

        e.g. / 例如:
        Error: upstream provider returned 429: rate limit exceeded
      render: shell
    validations:
      required: true

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant